Asymmetric Impact of FDI and Exchange Rate on Tourism: Evidence From Panel Linear and Nonlinear ARDL Model

This study analyzes the long run as well as short run linear and nonlinear impact of foreign direct investment (FDI) and exchange rate on tourism in South Asian countries. The study uses annual panel data of five South Asian countries that is Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka from 19...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kashif Munir, Mehwish Iftikhar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-09-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211046589
_version_ 1818647515841429504
author Kashif Munir
Mehwish Iftikhar
author_facet Kashif Munir
Mehwish Iftikhar
author_sort Kashif Munir
collection DOAJ
description This study analyzes the long run as well as short run linear and nonlinear impact of foreign direct investment (FDI) and exchange rate on tourism in South Asian countries. The study uses annual panel data of five South Asian countries that is Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka from 1995 to 2019 and applies panel linear autoregressive distributive lag (ARDL) and nonlinear autoregressive distributive lag (NARDL) methodology to analyze the long run and short run relationship among the variables. Results show that an increase in FDI and appreciation of exchange rate contracts tourism, while a decrease in FDI and depreciation of exchange rate expands tourism in the long run. Both FDI and exchange rate shows asymmetric behavior with tourism in the long run in South Asian countries. Results of individual countries show that FDI has asymmetric impact on tourism in Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka in the short run, while exchange rate has asymmetric impact on tourism in Bangladesh, India, Nepal, and Pakistan in the short run. Moreover, unidirectional causality exits from FDI, exchange rate, partial negative sum of FDI, and partial positive sum of exchange rate to tourism as well as from tourism to partial positive sum of FDI and partial negative sum of exchange rate. Therefore, there is a need to expand tourism sector through attracting FDI in tourism sector, while FDI attraction and tourism development must be well coordinated among different departments as well as maintain exchange rate at a reasonable level to encourage international tourism.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T01:03:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3641a478dcec4415913015ae0508cbaa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2158-2440
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T01:03:46Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series SAGE Open
spelling doaj.art-3641a478dcec4415913015ae0508cbaa2022-12-21T22:09:21ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402021-09-011110.1177/21582440211046589Asymmetric Impact of FDI and Exchange Rate on Tourism: Evidence From Panel Linear and Nonlinear ARDL ModelKashif Munir0Mehwish Iftikhar1University of Central Punjab, Lahore, PakistanUniversity of Central Punjab, Lahore, PakistanThis study analyzes the long run as well as short run linear and nonlinear impact of foreign direct investment (FDI) and exchange rate on tourism in South Asian countries. The study uses annual panel data of five South Asian countries that is Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka from 1995 to 2019 and applies panel linear autoregressive distributive lag (ARDL) and nonlinear autoregressive distributive lag (NARDL) methodology to analyze the long run and short run relationship among the variables. Results show that an increase in FDI and appreciation of exchange rate contracts tourism, while a decrease in FDI and depreciation of exchange rate expands tourism in the long run. Both FDI and exchange rate shows asymmetric behavior with tourism in the long run in South Asian countries. Results of individual countries show that FDI has asymmetric impact on tourism in Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka in the short run, while exchange rate has asymmetric impact on tourism in Bangladesh, India, Nepal, and Pakistan in the short run. Moreover, unidirectional causality exits from FDI, exchange rate, partial negative sum of FDI, and partial positive sum of exchange rate to tourism as well as from tourism to partial positive sum of FDI and partial negative sum of exchange rate. Therefore, there is a need to expand tourism sector through attracting FDI in tourism sector, while FDI attraction and tourism development must be well coordinated among different departments as well as maintain exchange rate at a reasonable level to encourage international tourism.https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211046589
spellingShingle Kashif Munir
Mehwish Iftikhar
Asymmetric Impact of FDI and Exchange Rate on Tourism: Evidence From Panel Linear and Nonlinear ARDL Model
SAGE Open
title Asymmetric Impact of FDI and Exchange Rate on Tourism: Evidence From Panel Linear and Nonlinear ARDL Model
title_full Asymmetric Impact of FDI and Exchange Rate on Tourism: Evidence From Panel Linear and Nonlinear ARDL Model
title_fullStr Asymmetric Impact of FDI and Exchange Rate on Tourism: Evidence From Panel Linear and Nonlinear ARDL Model
title_full_unstemmed Asymmetric Impact of FDI and Exchange Rate on Tourism: Evidence From Panel Linear and Nonlinear ARDL Model
title_short Asymmetric Impact of FDI and Exchange Rate on Tourism: Evidence From Panel Linear and Nonlinear ARDL Model
title_sort asymmetric impact of fdi and exchange rate on tourism evidence from panel linear and nonlinear ardl model
url https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211046589
work_keys_str_mv AT kashifmunir asymmetricimpactoffdiandexchangerateontourismevidencefrompanellinearandnonlinearardlmodel
AT mehwishiftikhar asymmetricimpactoffdiandexchangerateontourismevidencefrompanellinearandnonlinearardlmodel