| Summary: | Objective: to define and describe the boundaries, specifics of formation and content of anti-corruption procedural legislation of the Russian Federation subjects.Methods: the methodological basis of the study is dialectical materialism and general scientific methods of cognition based on it: analysis, synthesis, comparison, grouping and others, used in legal sciences.Results: the paper investigates the phenomenon of anti-corruption procedural legislation of the Russian Federation subjects as an inter-branch institution of modern Russian anti-corruption legislation. The article describes and explains the reasons for the adoption of regional laws governing the procedural issues of the state anti-corruption, namely, the federal legislator delegating the authority to adopt them and the requirements of law enforcement practice. The subject area of legal regulation of the regional anti-corruption procedural legislation is highlighted: a) submission of information about the property status of certain categories of officials and their families; b) verification of the submitted information; c) disclosure of information about the property status of certain categories of officials and their families; d) bringing to legal responsibility of officials for non-compliance with anti-corruption requirements, including dismissal from office due to loss of confidence. The authors propose their own scientific legal definition of the anti-corruption procedural legislation of the Russian Federation subjects as an inter-branch legal institution. Scientific novelty: for the first time in the Russian legal science it is declared about the presence of inter-branch institution of anti-corruption procedural legislation of the Russian Federation subjects; its existence is proved, its content is described and explained; the scientific category “anti-corruption procedural legislation of the Russian Federation subjects” is developed and proposed. Practical significance: the results of the study can be used to systematize and codify the federal and regional anti-corruption legislation, as well as to lay the theoretical foundations of anti-corruption procedural law. It is connected with the possibility to improve the regional legislation regulating the procedural issues of the state anti-corruption policy implementation.
|
|---|