Nature and the Value of Learning in Classical Chinese Philosophy and in Augustine—A Comparative Study

This paper compares Augustine’s view on the value of learning to classical Chinese philosophy (Laozi, Confucius, Mengzi, Xunzi, Zhu Xi). While Laozi has a quite negative notion of learning as leading humans away from true nature, most Confucians esteem learning highly as the only way to human perfec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Johannes Brachtendorf
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-12-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/14/12/1496
_version_ 1827573690107166720
author Johannes Brachtendorf
author_facet Johannes Brachtendorf
author_sort Johannes Brachtendorf
collection DOAJ
description This paper compares Augustine’s view on the value of learning to classical Chinese philosophy (Laozi, Confucius, Mengzi, Xunzi, Zhu Xi). While Laozi has a quite negative notion of learning as leading humans away from true nature, most Confucians esteem learning highly as the only way to human perfection. Similar to the Confucians, the early Augustine sees knowledge and learning as a way for humans to ascend to divine truth. In his mature works, however, Augustine points out more clearly the dangers of learning: it can make humans proud instead of humble, causing them to rely on their own power instead of confessing their weakness and their need for divine grace. His hesitations on the value of learning bear some similarity to Laozi’s view.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T20:23:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3649d9e1ac214ec0b12f281e2abd2d7b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-1444
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T20:23:54Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Religions
spelling doaj.art-3649d9e1ac214ec0b12f281e2abd2d7b2023-12-22T14:38:34ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442023-12-011412149610.3390/rel14121496Nature and the Value of Learning in Classical Chinese Philosophy and in Augustine—A Comparative StudyJohannes Brachtendorf0Department of Catholic Theology, University of Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstr. 12, 72076 Tuebingen, GermanyThis paper compares Augustine’s view on the value of learning to classical Chinese philosophy (Laozi, Confucius, Mengzi, Xunzi, Zhu Xi). While Laozi has a quite negative notion of learning as leading humans away from true nature, most Confucians esteem learning highly as the only way to human perfection. Similar to the Confucians, the early Augustine sees knowledge and learning as a way for humans to ascend to divine truth. In his mature works, however, Augustine points out more clearly the dangers of learning: it can make humans proud instead of humble, causing them to rely on their own power instead of confessing their weakness and their need for divine grace. His hesitations on the value of learning bear some similarity to Laozi’s view.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/14/12/1496learningknowledgeself-knowledgenatureConfucianismDaoism
spellingShingle Johannes Brachtendorf
Nature and the Value of Learning in Classical Chinese Philosophy and in Augustine—A Comparative Study
Religions
learning
knowledge
self-knowledge
nature
Confucianism
Daoism
title Nature and the Value of Learning in Classical Chinese Philosophy and in Augustine—A Comparative Study
title_full Nature and the Value of Learning in Classical Chinese Philosophy and in Augustine—A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Nature and the Value of Learning in Classical Chinese Philosophy and in Augustine—A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Nature and the Value of Learning in Classical Chinese Philosophy and in Augustine—A Comparative Study
title_short Nature and the Value of Learning in Classical Chinese Philosophy and in Augustine—A Comparative Study
title_sort nature and the value of learning in classical chinese philosophy and in augustine a comparative study
topic learning
knowledge
self-knowledge
nature
Confucianism
Daoism
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/14/12/1496
work_keys_str_mv AT johannesbrachtendorf natureandthevalueoflearninginclassicalchinesephilosophyandinaugustineacomparativestudy