Comparison of the actual and theoretical energy use in nZEB renovations of multi-family buildings using in situ monitoring

Often there is a significant difference between the actually measured and theoretically calculated energy use. The deviation between the two can be a result of errors in design, construction or commissioning, due to the technical performance of building components and installations that don’t meet t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Van de Putte Stijn, Bracke Wolf, Delghust Marc, Steeman Marijke, Janssens Arnold
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2020-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/32/e3sconf_nsb2020_22007.pdf
_version_ 1818414071564730368
author Van de Putte Stijn
Bracke Wolf
Delghust Marc
Steeman Marijke
Janssens Arnold
author_facet Van de Putte Stijn
Bracke Wolf
Delghust Marc
Steeman Marijke
Janssens Arnold
author_sort Van de Putte Stijn
collection DOAJ
description Often there is a significant difference between the actually measured and theoretically calculated energy use. The deviation between the two can be a result of errors in design, construction or commissioning, due to the technical performance of building components and installations that don’t meet the design requirements. But equally, incorrect assumptions in the calculation can largely affect the results, for example the user influence that is simulated in a different way. This paper presents the analysis of data from an on-site monitoring system of two case study multi-family buildings that were deeply refurbished. It points out that the calculated energy use for space heating was largely underestimated, while there was an overestimation of the energy use for domestic hot water. The high indoor temperature and the low occupancy of the apartments were identified as the key parameters to explain this striking difference between the theoretical design and the actual situation.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T11:13:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-364f25d5d73f4692914ec509a4934da9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2267-1242
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T11:13:16Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
series E3S Web of Conferences
spelling doaj.art-364f25d5d73f4692914ec509a4934da92022-12-21T23:04:11ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422020-01-011722200710.1051/e3sconf/202017222007e3sconf_nsb2020_22007Comparison of the actual and theoretical energy use in nZEB renovations of multi-family buildings using in situ monitoringVan de Putte Stijn0Bracke Wolf1Delghust Marc2Steeman Marijke3Janssens Arnold4Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent UniversityDepartment of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent UniversityDepartment of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent UniversityDepartment of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent UniversityDepartment of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent UniversityOften there is a significant difference between the actually measured and theoretically calculated energy use. The deviation between the two can be a result of errors in design, construction or commissioning, due to the technical performance of building components and installations that don’t meet the design requirements. But equally, incorrect assumptions in the calculation can largely affect the results, for example the user influence that is simulated in a different way. This paper presents the analysis of data from an on-site monitoring system of two case study multi-family buildings that were deeply refurbished. It points out that the calculated energy use for space heating was largely underestimated, while there was an overestimation of the energy use for domestic hot water. The high indoor temperature and the low occupancy of the apartments were identified as the key parameters to explain this striking difference between the theoretical design and the actual situation.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/32/e3sconf_nsb2020_22007.pdf
spellingShingle Van de Putte Stijn
Bracke Wolf
Delghust Marc
Steeman Marijke
Janssens Arnold
Comparison of the actual and theoretical energy use in nZEB renovations of multi-family buildings using in situ monitoring
E3S Web of Conferences
title Comparison of the actual and theoretical energy use in nZEB renovations of multi-family buildings using in situ monitoring
title_full Comparison of the actual and theoretical energy use in nZEB renovations of multi-family buildings using in situ monitoring
title_fullStr Comparison of the actual and theoretical energy use in nZEB renovations of multi-family buildings using in situ monitoring
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the actual and theoretical energy use in nZEB renovations of multi-family buildings using in situ monitoring
title_short Comparison of the actual and theoretical energy use in nZEB renovations of multi-family buildings using in situ monitoring
title_sort comparison of the actual and theoretical energy use in nzeb renovations of multi family buildings using in situ monitoring
url https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/32/e3sconf_nsb2020_22007.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT vandeputtestijn comparisonoftheactualandtheoreticalenergyuseinnzebrenovationsofmultifamilybuildingsusinginsitumonitoring
AT brackewolf comparisonoftheactualandtheoreticalenergyuseinnzebrenovationsofmultifamilybuildingsusinginsitumonitoring
AT delghustmarc comparisonoftheactualandtheoreticalenergyuseinnzebrenovationsofmultifamilybuildingsusinginsitumonitoring
AT steemanmarijke comparisonoftheactualandtheoreticalenergyuseinnzebrenovationsofmultifamilybuildingsusinginsitumonitoring
AT janssensarnold comparisonoftheactualandtheoreticalenergyuseinnzebrenovationsofmultifamilybuildingsusinginsitumonitoring