WIRELESS PH MONITORING AND CONVENTIONAL ESOPHAGEAL PH MONITORING: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DISCOMFORT, LIMITATIONS IN DAILY ACTIVITIES AND COMPLICATIONS

ABSTRACT Background: The catheter of the esophageal pH monitoring is associated with nasal and throat discomfort, and different behave in patients. The capsule of the wireless pH monitoring may cause chest pain and complications. Aim: To compare the wireless and conventional pH monitoring conc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rimon Sobhi AZZAM, Gabriela Barge AZZAM, Ary NASI
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva 2021-05-01
Series:ABCD: Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202021000100307&tlng=en
_version_ 1819284448544292864
author Rimon Sobhi AZZAM
Gabriela Barge AZZAM
Ary NASI
author_facet Rimon Sobhi AZZAM
Gabriela Barge AZZAM
Ary NASI
author_sort Rimon Sobhi AZZAM
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Background: The catheter of the esophageal pH monitoring is associated with nasal and throat discomfort, and different behave in patients. The capsule of the wireless pH monitoring may cause chest pain and complications. Aim: To compare the wireless and conventional pH monitoring concerning the degree of discomfort and limitations in daily activities, complications, ability to diagnose pathological reflux, and costs. Methods: Twenty-five patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux were prospectively submitted, in a simultaneous initial period, to 24-hour catheter esophageal pH monitoring and 48-hour wireless system. After removing each system, patients underwent a specific clinical questionnaire. Results: Fifteen patients (60%) pointed a higher discomfort in the introduction of the capsule (p=0.327). Discomfort and limitations in daily activities were lower on 2nd day (p<0.05); however, continued to be expressive (32% to 44%). Chest pain occurred in 13 (52%) patients. The diagnostic gain of pathological reflux was 12% with the wireless system (p=0.355). Conclusions: 1) There is no significant difference between the discomfort mentioned in the introduction of the capsule and the catheter; 2) during reflux monitoring, the wireless system provides significant less discomfort and limitations in daily activities; 3) there is no significant difference between the two methods in the ability to diagnose pathological reflux; 4) wireless pH monitoring has higher cost.
first_indexed 2024-12-24T01:47:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-364fe4638aa44b46ad0aa84681e1f6bc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0102-6720
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-24T01:47:32Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
record_format Article
series ABCD: Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva
spelling doaj.art-364fe4638aa44b46ad0aa84681e1f6bc2022-12-21T17:21:49ZengColégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia DigestivaABCD: Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva0102-67202021-05-0134110.1590/0102-672020210001e1566WIRELESS PH MONITORING AND CONVENTIONAL ESOPHAGEAL PH MONITORING: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DISCOMFORT, LIMITATIONS IN DAILY ACTIVITIES AND COMPLICATIONSRimon Sobhi AZZAMhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9156-2185Gabriela Barge AZZAMhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3291-5673Ary NASIhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6928-4281ABSTRACT Background: The catheter of the esophageal pH monitoring is associated with nasal and throat discomfort, and different behave in patients. The capsule of the wireless pH monitoring may cause chest pain and complications. Aim: To compare the wireless and conventional pH monitoring concerning the degree of discomfort and limitations in daily activities, complications, ability to diagnose pathological reflux, and costs. Methods: Twenty-five patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux were prospectively submitted, in a simultaneous initial period, to 24-hour catheter esophageal pH monitoring and 48-hour wireless system. After removing each system, patients underwent a specific clinical questionnaire. Results: Fifteen patients (60%) pointed a higher discomfort in the introduction of the capsule (p=0.327). Discomfort and limitations in daily activities were lower on 2nd day (p<0.05); however, continued to be expressive (32% to 44%). Chest pain occurred in 13 (52%) patients. The diagnostic gain of pathological reflux was 12% with the wireless system (p=0.355). Conclusions: 1) There is no significant difference between the discomfort mentioned in the introduction of the capsule and the catheter; 2) during reflux monitoring, the wireless system provides significant less discomfort and limitations in daily activities; 3) there is no significant difference between the two methods in the ability to diagnose pathological reflux; 4) wireless pH monitoring has higher cost.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202021000100307&tlng=enGastroesophageal refluxEsophageal pH monitoringWireless technology
spellingShingle Rimon Sobhi AZZAM
Gabriela Barge AZZAM
Ary NASI
WIRELESS PH MONITORING AND CONVENTIONAL ESOPHAGEAL PH MONITORING: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DISCOMFORT, LIMITATIONS IN DAILY ACTIVITIES AND COMPLICATIONS
ABCD: Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva
Gastroesophageal reflux
Esophageal pH monitoring
Wireless technology
title WIRELESS PH MONITORING AND CONVENTIONAL ESOPHAGEAL PH MONITORING: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DISCOMFORT, LIMITATIONS IN DAILY ACTIVITIES AND COMPLICATIONS
title_full WIRELESS PH MONITORING AND CONVENTIONAL ESOPHAGEAL PH MONITORING: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DISCOMFORT, LIMITATIONS IN DAILY ACTIVITIES AND COMPLICATIONS
title_fullStr WIRELESS PH MONITORING AND CONVENTIONAL ESOPHAGEAL PH MONITORING: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DISCOMFORT, LIMITATIONS IN DAILY ACTIVITIES AND COMPLICATIONS
title_full_unstemmed WIRELESS PH MONITORING AND CONVENTIONAL ESOPHAGEAL PH MONITORING: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DISCOMFORT, LIMITATIONS IN DAILY ACTIVITIES AND COMPLICATIONS
title_short WIRELESS PH MONITORING AND CONVENTIONAL ESOPHAGEAL PH MONITORING: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DISCOMFORT, LIMITATIONS IN DAILY ACTIVITIES AND COMPLICATIONS
title_sort wireless ph monitoring and conventional esophageal ph monitoring comparative study of discomfort limitations in daily activities and complications
topic Gastroesophageal reflux
Esophageal pH monitoring
Wireless technology
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202021000100307&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT rimonsobhiazzam wirelessphmonitoringandconventionalesophagealphmonitoringcomparativestudyofdiscomfortlimitationsindailyactivitiesandcomplications
AT gabrielabargeazzam wirelessphmonitoringandconventionalesophagealphmonitoringcomparativestudyofdiscomfortlimitationsindailyactivitiesandcomplications
AT arynasi wirelessphmonitoringandconventionalesophagealphmonitoringcomparativestudyofdiscomfortlimitationsindailyactivitiesandcomplications