Effects of Male Defendants’ Attractiveness and Trustworthiness on Simulated Judicial Decisions in Two Different Swindles

The present study aimed to examine the effects of male defendants’ facial appearance (attractiveness and trustworthiness) on judicial decisions in two different swindles. We selected the following four categories of faces by manipulating facial attractiveness and trustworthiness simultaneously: the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qun Yang, Bing Zhu, Qian Zhang, Yuchao Wang, Ruiheng Hu, Shengmin Liu, Delin Sun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02160/full
_version_ 1819045949784195072
author Qun Yang
Bing Zhu
Qian Zhang
Yuchao Wang
Ruiheng Hu
Shengmin Liu
Delin Sun
author_facet Qun Yang
Bing Zhu
Qian Zhang
Yuchao Wang
Ruiheng Hu
Shengmin Liu
Delin Sun
author_sort Qun Yang
collection DOAJ
description The present study aimed to examine the effects of male defendants’ facial appearance (attractiveness and trustworthiness) on judicial decisions in two different swindles. We selected the following four categories of faces by manipulating facial attractiveness and trustworthiness simultaneously: the attractive and trustworthy face; the attractive but untrustworthy face; the unattractive but trustworthy face; and the unattractive and untrustworthy face. A total of six hundred and sixty-three participants across two studies were asked to make conviction-related judgments and penalty-related decisions for the defendants after they were randomly assigned to one of the four categories of faces. In Experiment 1, we used a blind-date swindle and found a “beauty penalty” for physically attractive defendants among females. Specifically, female participants were more likely to issue a guilty verdict to better-looking male defendants. Additionally, this “beauty-penalty effect” was merely observed in the untrustworthy condition. In Experiment 2, we used a telecommunication swindle, and the results showed that facial trustworthiness significantly predicted punishment magnitude and sentence decisions. Moreover, an exploratory analysis revealed that the disgust evoked by the faces partially mediated the relationship between facial trustworthiness and the assignment of criminal penalties. Taken together, these findings indicated that facial attractiveness and trustworthiness played different roles in judicial decisions. Importantly, the effect of facial attractiveness on judicial decisions differed as the detailed criminal circumstances of the offenses changed.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T10:36:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-36644ca413584640abc7b32870bf5969
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T10:36:42Z
publishDate 2019-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-36644ca413584640abc7b32870bf59692022-12-21T19:07:03ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782019-09-011010.3389/fpsyg.2019.02160462372Effects of Male Defendants’ Attractiveness and Trustworthiness on Simulated Judicial Decisions in Two Different SwindlesQun Yang0Bing Zhu1Qian Zhang2Yuchao Wang3Ruiheng Hu4Shengmin Liu5Delin Sun6Institute of Psychological Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, ChinaInstitute of Psychological Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, ChinaInstitute of Psychological Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, ChinaInstitute of Psychological Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, ChinaMental Health Center, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Psychology, Huzhou Normal University, Huzhou, ChinaDuke-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Brain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, United StatesThe present study aimed to examine the effects of male defendants’ facial appearance (attractiveness and trustworthiness) on judicial decisions in two different swindles. We selected the following four categories of faces by manipulating facial attractiveness and trustworthiness simultaneously: the attractive and trustworthy face; the attractive but untrustworthy face; the unattractive but trustworthy face; and the unattractive and untrustworthy face. A total of six hundred and sixty-three participants across two studies were asked to make conviction-related judgments and penalty-related decisions for the defendants after they were randomly assigned to one of the four categories of faces. In Experiment 1, we used a blind-date swindle and found a “beauty penalty” for physically attractive defendants among females. Specifically, female participants were more likely to issue a guilty verdict to better-looking male defendants. Additionally, this “beauty-penalty effect” was merely observed in the untrustworthy condition. In Experiment 2, we used a telecommunication swindle, and the results showed that facial trustworthiness significantly predicted punishment magnitude and sentence decisions. Moreover, an exploratory analysis revealed that the disgust evoked by the faces partially mediated the relationship between facial trustworthiness and the assignment of criminal penalties. Taken together, these findings indicated that facial attractiveness and trustworthiness played different roles in judicial decisions. Importantly, the effect of facial attractiveness on judicial decisions differed as the detailed criminal circumstances of the offenses changed.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02160/fullfacial attractivenessfacial trustworthinessdefendantsswindlesjudicial decision making
spellingShingle Qun Yang
Bing Zhu
Qian Zhang
Yuchao Wang
Ruiheng Hu
Shengmin Liu
Delin Sun
Effects of Male Defendants’ Attractiveness and Trustworthiness on Simulated Judicial Decisions in Two Different Swindles
Frontiers in Psychology
facial attractiveness
facial trustworthiness
defendants
swindles
judicial decision making
title Effects of Male Defendants’ Attractiveness and Trustworthiness on Simulated Judicial Decisions in Two Different Swindles
title_full Effects of Male Defendants’ Attractiveness and Trustworthiness on Simulated Judicial Decisions in Two Different Swindles
title_fullStr Effects of Male Defendants’ Attractiveness and Trustworthiness on Simulated Judicial Decisions in Two Different Swindles
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Male Defendants’ Attractiveness and Trustworthiness on Simulated Judicial Decisions in Two Different Swindles
title_short Effects of Male Defendants’ Attractiveness and Trustworthiness on Simulated Judicial Decisions in Two Different Swindles
title_sort effects of male defendants attractiveness and trustworthiness on simulated judicial decisions in two different swindles
topic facial attractiveness
facial trustworthiness
defendants
swindles
judicial decision making
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02160/full
work_keys_str_mv AT qunyang effectsofmaledefendantsattractivenessandtrustworthinessonsimulatedjudicialdecisionsintwodifferentswindles
AT bingzhu effectsofmaledefendantsattractivenessandtrustworthinessonsimulatedjudicialdecisionsintwodifferentswindles
AT qianzhang effectsofmaledefendantsattractivenessandtrustworthinessonsimulatedjudicialdecisionsintwodifferentswindles
AT yuchaowang effectsofmaledefendantsattractivenessandtrustworthinessonsimulatedjudicialdecisionsintwodifferentswindles
AT ruihenghu effectsofmaledefendantsattractivenessandtrustworthinessonsimulatedjudicialdecisionsintwodifferentswindles
AT shengminliu effectsofmaledefendantsattractivenessandtrustworthinessonsimulatedjudicialdecisionsintwodifferentswindles
AT delinsun effectsofmaledefendantsattractivenessandtrustworthinessonsimulatedjudicialdecisionsintwodifferentswindles