Bracket Transfer Accuracy with the Indirect Bonding Technique—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Purpose: To investigate the bracket transfer accuracy of the indirect bonding technique (IDB). Methods: Systematic search of the literature was conducted in PubMed MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus through November 2021. Selection Criteria: In vivo and ex vivo studies investigating bracket...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-05-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/9/2568 |
| _version_ | 1797504128412286976 |
|---|---|
| author | Hisham Sabbagh Yeganeh Khazaei Uwe Baumert Lea Hoffmann Andrea Wichelhaus Mila Janjic Rankovic |
| author_facet | Hisham Sabbagh Yeganeh Khazaei Uwe Baumert Lea Hoffmann Andrea Wichelhaus Mila Janjic Rankovic |
| author_sort | Hisham Sabbagh |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Purpose: To investigate the bracket transfer accuracy of the indirect bonding technique (IDB). Methods: Systematic search of the literature was conducted in PubMed MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus through November 2021. Selection Criteria: In vivo and ex vivo studies investigating bracket transfer accuracy by comparing the planned and achieved bracket positions using the IDB technique were considered. Information concerning patients, samples, and applied methodology was collected. Measured mean transfer errors (MTE) for angular and linear directions were extracted. Risk of bias (RoB) in the studies was assessed using a tailored RoB tool. Meta-analysis of ex vivo studies was performed for overall linear and angular bracket transfer accuracy and for subgroup analyses by type of tray, tooth groups, jaw-related, side-related, and by assessment method. Results: A total of 16 studies met the eligibility criteria for this systematic review. The overall linear mean transfer errors (MTE) in mesiodistal, vertical and buccolingual direction were 0.08 mm (95% CI 0.05; 0.10), 0.09 mm (0.06; 0.11), 0.14 mm (0.10; 0.17), respectively. The overall angular mean transfer errors (MTE) regarding angulation, rotation, torque were 1.13° (0.75; 1.52), 0.93° (0.49; 1.37), and 1.11° (0.68; 1.53), respectively. Silicone trays showed the highest accuracy, followed by vacuum-formed trays and 3D printed trays. Subgroup analyses between tooth groups, right and left sides, and upper and lower jaw showed minor differences. Conclusions and implications: The overall accuracy of the indirect bonding technique can be considered clinically acceptable. Future studies should address the validation of the accuracy assessment methods used. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T04:00:15Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-3667d6149e5142a5933f42183d4e21ae |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2077-0383 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T04:00:15Z |
| publishDate | 2022-05-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
| spelling | doaj.art-3667d6149e5142a5933f42183d4e21ae2023-11-23T08:34:13ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832022-05-01119256810.3390/jcm11092568Bracket Transfer Accuracy with the Indirect Bonding Technique—A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisHisham Sabbagh0Yeganeh Khazaei1Uwe Baumert2Lea Hoffmann3Andrea Wichelhaus4Mila Janjic Rankovic5Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestrasse 70, 80336 Munich, GermanyStatistical Consultation Unit, StaBLab, Department of Statistics, LMU Munich, 80799 Munich, GermanyDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestrasse 70, 80336 Munich, GermanyDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestrasse 70, 80336 Munich, GermanyDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestrasse 70, 80336 Munich, GermanyDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestrasse 70, 80336 Munich, GermanyPurpose: To investigate the bracket transfer accuracy of the indirect bonding technique (IDB). Methods: Systematic search of the literature was conducted in PubMed MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus through November 2021. Selection Criteria: In vivo and ex vivo studies investigating bracket transfer accuracy by comparing the planned and achieved bracket positions using the IDB technique were considered. Information concerning patients, samples, and applied methodology was collected. Measured mean transfer errors (MTE) for angular and linear directions were extracted. Risk of bias (RoB) in the studies was assessed using a tailored RoB tool. Meta-analysis of ex vivo studies was performed for overall linear and angular bracket transfer accuracy and for subgroup analyses by type of tray, tooth groups, jaw-related, side-related, and by assessment method. Results: A total of 16 studies met the eligibility criteria for this systematic review. The overall linear mean transfer errors (MTE) in mesiodistal, vertical and buccolingual direction were 0.08 mm (95% CI 0.05; 0.10), 0.09 mm (0.06; 0.11), 0.14 mm (0.10; 0.17), respectively. The overall angular mean transfer errors (MTE) regarding angulation, rotation, torque were 1.13° (0.75; 1.52), 0.93° (0.49; 1.37), and 1.11° (0.68; 1.53), respectively. Silicone trays showed the highest accuracy, followed by vacuum-formed trays and 3D printed trays. Subgroup analyses between tooth groups, right and left sides, and upper and lower jaw showed minor differences. Conclusions and implications: The overall accuracy of the indirect bonding technique can be considered clinically acceptable. Future studies should address the validation of the accuracy assessment methods used.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/9/2568bracket bondingindirect bondingorthodontic bracketstransfer accuracybracket positioningbonding accuracy |
| spellingShingle | Hisham Sabbagh Yeganeh Khazaei Uwe Baumert Lea Hoffmann Andrea Wichelhaus Mila Janjic Rankovic Bracket Transfer Accuracy with the Indirect Bonding Technique—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Journal of Clinical Medicine bracket bonding indirect bonding orthodontic brackets transfer accuracy bracket positioning bonding accuracy |
| title | Bracket Transfer Accuracy with the Indirect Bonding Technique—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
| title_full | Bracket Transfer Accuracy with the Indirect Bonding Technique—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
| title_fullStr | Bracket Transfer Accuracy with the Indirect Bonding Technique—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Bracket Transfer Accuracy with the Indirect Bonding Technique—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
| title_short | Bracket Transfer Accuracy with the Indirect Bonding Technique—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
| title_sort | bracket transfer accuracy with the indirect bonding technique a systematic review and meta analysis |
| topic | bracket bonding indirect bonding orthodontic brackets transfer accuracy bracket positioning bonding accuracy |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/9/2568 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hishamsabbagh brackettransferaccuracywiththeindirectbondingtechniqueasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yeganehkhazaei brackettransferaccuracywiththeindirectbondingtechniqueasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT uwebaumert brackettransferaccuracywiththeindirectbondingtechniqueasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leahoffmann brackettransferaccuracywiththeindirectbondingtechniqueasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT andreawichelhaus brackettransferaccuracywiththeindirectbondingtechniqueasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT milajanjicrankovic brackettransferaccuracywiththeindirectbondingtechniqueasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |