Internal carotid artery stenosis: comparison of duplex scan and magnetic resonance angiography with digital subtraction angiography

OBJECTIVE: We compare duplex scan (DS) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with digital angiography (DGA) in respect to accuracy in measuring internal carotid artery (IC) stenosis in symptomatic patients. METHOD: Ten symptomatic patients with IC stenosis greater than 70% previously diagnosed by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Py Marco Oliveira, André Charles, Azevedo Feliciano Silva de, Domingues Romeu Côrtes, Salomão Rodrigo Ferraz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Academia Brasileira de Neurologia (ABNEURO) 2001-01-01
Series:Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2001000500002
_version_ 1828745273633931264
author Py Marco Oliveira
André Charles
Azevedo Feliciano Silva de
Domingues Romeu Côrtes
Salomão Rodrigo Ferraz
author_facet Py Marco Oliveira
André Charles
Azevedo Feliciano Silva de
Domingues Romeu Côrtes
Salomão Rodrigo Ferraz
author_sort Py Marco Oliveira
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVE: We compare duplex scan (DS) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with digital angiography (DGA) in respect to accuracy in measuring internal carotid artery (IC) stenosis in symptomatic patients. METHOD: Ten symptomatic patients with IC stenosis greater than 70% previously diagnosed by DS were submitted to another DS and to both MRA and DGA. Both ICs from each patient (total 20 ICs) were evaluated by physicians blinded for the results of other tests. DS and MRA were compared with DGA, using the intraclass correlation coeficient (r) and its 95% confidence interval (95% ci). For each diagnostic test, the study group (20 Ics) was also divided in surgical patients (IC stenosis between 70 and 99%) and non surgical patients, using kappa concordance coeficient (k) to compare the results. RESULTS: Main comparisons are: DS and DGA, r = 0.71 (0.4 - 0.87); MRA and DGA, r = 0.61 (0.25 - 0.82). After division into surgical vs. non-surgical groups, k = 0.857 (p < 0.0001) between DS and DGA; and k = 0.545 (p = 0.003) between MRA and DGA. Most DS and MRA errors occurred in IC sub-occlusions. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that when they are used together, DS and non-contrast MRA may substitute DGA in the evaluation of patients for IC stenosis surgery, except when there is discordance between their results or when the methods show sub-occlusive stenosis.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T03:58:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-366cabb981bb4e748478c09f5e08201f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0004-282X
1678-4227
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T03:58:53Z
publishDate 2001-01-01
publisher Academia Brasileira de Neurologia (ABNEURO)
record_format Article
series Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
spelling doaj.art-366cabb981bb4e748478c09f5e08201f2022-12-22T02:13:36ZengAcademia Brasileira de Neurologia (ABNEURO)Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria0004-282X1678-42272001-01-01593B665671Internal carotid artery stenosis: comparison of duplex scan and magnetic resonance angiography with digital subtraction angiographyPy Marco OliveiraAndré CharlesAzevedo Feliciano Silva deDomingues Romeu CôrtesSalomão Rodrigo FerrazOBJECTIVE: We compare duplex scan (DS) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with digital angiography (DGA) in respect to accuracy in measuring internal carotid artery (IC) stenosis in symptomatic patients. METHOD: Ten symptomatic patients with IC stenosis greater than 70% previously diagnosed by DS were submitted to another DS and to both MRA and DGA. Both ICs from each patient (total 20 ICs) were evaluated by physicians blinded for the results of other tests. DS and MRA were compared with DGA, using the intraclass correlation coeficient (r) and its 95% confidence interval (95% ci). For each diagnostic test, the study group (20 Ics) was also divided in surgical patients (IC stenosis between 70 and 99%) and non surgical patients, using kappa concordance coeficient (k) to compare the results. RESULTS: Main comparisons are: DS and DGA, r = 0.71 (0.4 - 0.87); MRA and DGA, r = 0.61 (0.25 - 0.82). After division into surgical vs. non-surgical groups, k = 0.857 (p < 0.0001) between DS and DGA; and k = 0.545 (p = 0.003) between MRA and DGA. Most DS and MRA errors occurred in IC sub-occlusions. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that when they are used together, DS and non-contrast MRA may substitute DGA in the evaluation of patients for IC stenosis surgery, except when there is discordance between their results or when the methods show sub-occlusive stenosis.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2001000500002carotid stenosisdiagnosiscerebrovascular diseasecomparative study
spellingShingle Py Marco Oliveira
André Charles
Azevedo Feliciano Silva de
Domingues Romeu Côrtes
Salomão Rodrigo Ferraz
Internal carotid artery stenosis: comparison of duplex scan and magnetic resonance angiography with digital subtraction angiography
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
carotid stenosis
diagnosis
cerebrovascular disease
comparative study
title Internal carotid artery stenosis: comparison of duplex scan and magnetic resonance angiography with digital subtraction angiography
title_full Internal carotid artery stenosis: comparison of duplex scan and magnetic resonance angiography with digital subtraction angiography
title_fullStr Internal carotid artery stenosis: comparison of duplex scan and magnetic resonance angiography with digital subtraction angiography
title_full_unstemmed Internal carotid artery stenosis: comparison of duplex scan and magnetic resonance angiography with digital subtraction angiography
title_short Internal carotid artery stenosis: comparison of duplex scan and magnetic resonance angiography with digital subtraction angiography
title_sort internal carotid artery stenosis comparison of duplex scan and magnetic resonance angiography with digital subtraction angiography
topic carotid stenosis
diagnosis
cerebrovascular disease
comparative study
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2001000500002
work_keys_str_mv AT pymarcooliveira internalcarotidarterystenosiscomparisonofduplexscanandmagneticresonanceangiographywithdigitalsubtractionangiography
AT andrecharles internalcarotidarterystenosiscomparisonofduplexscanandmagneticresonanceangiographywithdigitalsubtractionangiography
AT azevedofelicianosilvade internalcarotidarterystenosiscomparisonofduplexscanandmagneticresonanceangiographywithdigitalsubtractionangiography
AT dominguesromeucortes internalcarotidarterystenosiscomparisonofduplexscanandmagneticresonanceangiographywithdigitalsubtractionangiography
AT salomaorodrigoferraz internalcarotidarterystenosiscomparisonofduplexscanandmagneticresonanceangiographywithdigitalsubtractionangiography