Horizontal Geolocation Error Evaluation and Correction on Full-Waveform LiDAR Footprints via Waveform Matching

The geolocation accuracy of spaceborne LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) data is important for quantitative forest inventory. Geolocation errors in Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) footprints are almost unavoidable because of the instability of orbital parameter estimation and GNSS (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yifang Xu, Sheng Ding, Peimin Chen, Hailong Tang, Hongkai Ren, Huabing Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-01-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/3/776
_version_ 1797623313117216768
author Yifang Xu
Sheng Ding
Peimin Chen
Hailong Tang
Hongkai Ren
Huabing Huang
author_facet Yifang Xu
Sheng Ding
Peimin Chen
Hailong Tang
Hongkai Ren
Huabing Huang
author_sort Yifang Xu
collection DOAJ
description The geolocation accuracy of spaceborne LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) data is important for quantitative forest inventory. Geolocation errors in Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) footprints are almost unavoidable because of the instability of orbital parameter estimation and GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite Systems) positioning accuracy. This study calculates the horizontal geolocation error of multiple temporal GEDI footprints using a waveform matching method, which compares original GEDI waveforms with the corresponding simulated waveforms from airborne LiDAR point clouds. The results show that the GEDI footprint geolocation error varies from 3.04 m to 65.03 m. In particular, the footprints from good orbit data perform better than those from weak orbit data, while the nighttime and daytime footprints perform similarly. After removing the system error, the average waveform similarity coefficient of multi-temporal footprints increases obviously in low-waveform-similarity footprints, especially in weak orbit footprints. When the waveform matching effect is measured using the threshold of the waveform similarity coefficient, the waveform matching method can significantly improve up to 32% of the temporal GEDI footprint datasets from a poor matching effect to a good matching effect. In the improvement of the ratio of individual footprint waveform similarity, the mean value of the training set and test set is about two thirds, but the variance in the test set is large. Our study first quantifies the geolocation error of the newest version of GEDI footprints (Version 2). Future research should focus on the improvement of the detail of the waveform matching method and the combination of the terrain matching method with GEDI waveform LiDAR.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T09:26:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-366e4bb8c68540cb80a93f80f94c436f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T09:26:54Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-366e4bb8c68540cb80a93f80f94c436f2023-11-16T17:54:05ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922023-01-0115377610.3390/rs15030776Horizontal Geolocation Error Evaluation and Correction on Full-Waveform LiDAR Footprints via Waveform MatchingYifang Xu0Sheng Ding1Peimin Chen2Hailong Tang3Hongkai Ren4Huabing Huang5School of Geospatial Engineering and Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai 519082, ChinaForestry Surveying and Designing Institute of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510520, ChinaSchool of Geospatial Engineering and Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai 519082, ChinaSchool of Geospatial Engineering and Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai 519082, ChinaSchool of Geospatial Engineering and Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai 519082, ChinaSchool of Geospatial Engineering and Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai 519082, ChinaThe geolocation accuracy of spaceborne LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) data is important for quantitative forest inventory. Geolocation errors in Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) footprints are almost unavoidable because of the instability of orbital parameter estimation and GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite Systems) positioning accuracy. This study calculates the horizontal geolocation error of multiple temporal GEDI footprints using a waveform matching method, which compares original GEDI waveforms with the corresponding simulated waveforms from airborne LiDAR point clouds. The results show that the GEDI footprint geolocation error varies from 3.04 m to 65.03 m. In particular, the footprints from good orbit data perform better than those from weak orbit data, while the nighttime and daytime footprints perform similarly. After removing the system error, the average waveform similarity coefficient of multi-temporal footprints increases obviously in low-waveform-similarity footprints, especially in weak orbit footprints. When the waveform matching effect is measured using the threshold of the waveform similarity coefficient, the waveform matching method can significantly improve up to 32% of the temporal GEDI footprint datasets from a poor matching effect to a good matching effect. In the improvement of the ratio of individual footprint waveform similarity, the mean value of the training set and test set is about two thirds, but the variance in the test set is large. Our study first quantifies the geolocation error of the newest version of GEDI footprints (Version 2). Future research should focus on the improvement of the detail of the waveform matching method and the combination of the terrain matching method with GEDI waveform LiDAR.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/3/776GEDIspaceborne full-waveform LiDARgeolocation errorairborne LiDARwaveform matching
spellingShingle Yifang Xu
Sheng Ding
Peimin Chen
Hailong Tang
Hongkai Ren
Huabing Huang
Horizontal Geolocation Error Evaluation and Correction on Full-Waveform LiDAR Footprints via Waveform Matching
Remote Sensing
GEDI
spaceborne full-waveform LiDAR
geolocation error
airborne LiDAR
waveform matching
title Horizontal Geolocation Error Evaluation and Correction on Full-Waveform LiDAR Footprints via Waveform Matching
title_full Horizontal Geolocation Error Evaluation and Correction on Full-Waveform LiDAR Footprints via Waveform Matching
title_fullStr Horizontal Geolocation Error Evaluation and Correction on Full-Waveform LiDAR Footprints via Waveform Matching
title_full_unstemmed Horizontal Geolocation Error Evaluation and Correction on Full-Waveform LiDAR Footprints via Waveform Matching
title_short Horizontal Geolocation Error Evaluation and Correction on Full-Waveform LiDAR Footprints via Waveform Matching
title_sort horizontal geolocation error evaluation and correction on full waveform lidar footprints via waveform matching
topic GEDI
spaceborne full-waveform LiDAR
geolocation error
airborne LiDAR
waveform matching
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/3/776
work_keys_str_mv AT yifangxu horizontalgeolocationerrorevaluationandcorrectiononfullwaveformlidarfootprintsviawaveformmatching
AT shengding horizontalgeolocationerrorevaluationandcorrectiononfullwaveformlidarfootprintsviawaveformmatching
AT peiminchen horizontalgeolocationerrorevaluationandcorrectiononfullwaveformlidarfootprintsviawaveformmatching
AT hailongtang horizontalgeolocationerrorevaluationandcorrectiononfullwaveformlidarfootprintsviawaveformmatching
AT hongkairen horizontalgeolocationerrorevaluationandcorrectiononfullwaveformlidarfootprintsviawaveformmatching
AT huabinghuang horizontalgeolocationerrorevaluationandcorrectiononfullwaveformlidarfootprintsviawaveformmatching