Clarifying the neural substrates of threat and safety reversal learning in humans

Responding flexibly to sources of threat and safety is critical to the adaptive regulation of emotions, including fear. At a neural systems level, such flexibility is thought to rely on an extended neural circuitry involving the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) and ventromedial prefrontal cor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hannah S. Savage, Christopher G. Davey, Miquel A. Fullana, Ben J. Harrison
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-02-01
Series:NeuroImage
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811919310183
_version_ 1818962553654476800
author Hannah S. Savage
Christopher G. Davey
Miquel A. Fullana
Ben J. Harrison
author_facet Hannah S. Savage
Christopher G. Davey
Miquel A. Fullana
Ben J. Harrison
author_sort Hannah S. Savage
collection DOAJ
description Responding flexibly to sources of threat and safety is critical to the adaptive regulation of emotions, including fear. At a neural systems level, such flexibility is thought to rely on an extended neural circuitry involving the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) and ventromedial prefrontal cortices (vmPFC), although precisely how this occurs remains unclear. Using a novel fear reversal task and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we examined the neural correlates of threat and safety reversal learning and their associations with individual differences in anxious responding in a large sample of healthy adolescents and young adults. Overall, participants demonstrated successful threat and safety reversal learning, as indexed by subjective ratings. At a whole-brain level, threat reversal was associated with significant activation of the bilateral anterior insular cortex and dACC, in particular its rostral subregion. Conversely, safety reversal led to significant activation of the anterior vmPFC, together with posterior mid-line regions. Further analyses of regional responses suggested a more selective role for the rostral dACC in threat signal updating, as well as a direct association of its activity with participants’ change in subjective anxious arousal to the reversed threat. Taken together, our findings complement existing neurocircuitry models of human fear regulation, particularly regarding the importance of midline cortical regions, and provide further insights into their specific contribution to flexible threat-safety signal processing. In particular, our results suggest that rostral dACC function may be more centrally involved in regulating levels of anxious arousal when flexibility is required. They also raise important questions regarding the vmPFC’s role in safety learning, particularly involving its hypothesized subregional contributions to response inhibitory versus stimulus value processing functions.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T12:31:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-36777926b8e9461db6ad437b82c95759
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1095-9572
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T12:31:09Z
publishDate 2020-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series NeuroImage
spelling doaj.art-36777926b8e9461db6ad437b82c957592022-12-21T19:40:43ZengElsevierNeuroImage1095-95722020-02-01207116427Clarifying the neural substrates of threat and safety reversal learning in humansHannah S. Savage0Christopher G. Davey1Miquel A. Fullana2Ben J. Harrison3Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne & Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia; Corresponding author. Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Level 3, 161 Barry St, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia.Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, AustraliaAdult Psychiatry and Psychology Department, Institute of Neurosciences, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain; Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Barcelona, SpainMelbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne & Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia; Corresponding author. Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Level 3, 161 Barry St. Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia.Responding flexibly to sources of threat and safety is critical to the adaptive regulation of emotions, including fear. At a neural systems level, such flexibility is thought to rely on an extended neural circuitry involving the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) and ventromedial prefrontal cortices (vmPFC), although precisely how this occurs remains unclear. Using a novel fear reversal task and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we examined the neural correlates of threat and safety reversal learning and their associations with individual differences in anxious responding in a large sample of healthy adolescents and young adults. Overall, participants demonstrated successful threat and safety reversal learning, as indexed by subjective ratings. At a whole-brain level, threat reversal was associated with significant activation of the bilateral anterior insular cortex and dACC, in particular its rostral subregion. Conversely, safety reversal led to significant activation of the anterior vmPFC, together with posterior mid-line regions. Further analyses of regional responses suggested a more selective role for the rostral dACC in threat signal updating, as well as a direct association of its activity with participants’ change in subjective anxious arousal to the reversed threat. Taken together, our findings complement existing neurocircuitry models of human fear regulation, particularly regarding the importance of midline cortical regions, and provide further insights into their specific contribution to flexible threat-safety signal processing. In particular, our results suggest that rostral dACC function may be more centrally involved in regulating levels of anxious arousal when flexibility is required. They also raise important questions regarding the vmPFC’s role in safety learning, particularly involving its hypothesized subregional contributions to response inhibitory versus stimulus value processing functions.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811919310183ThreatSafetyReversal learningFear conditioningVentromedial prefrontal cortexAnterior cingulate cortex
spellingShingle Hannah S. Savage
Christopher G. Davey
Miquel A. Fullana
Ben J. Harrison
Clarifying the neural substrates of threat and safety reversal learning in humans
NeuroImage
Threat
Safety
Reversal learning
Fear conditioning
Ventromedial prefrontal cortex
Anterior cingulate cortex
title Clarifying the neural substrates of threat and safety reversal learning in humans
title_full Clarifying the neural substrates of threat and safety reversal learning in humans
title_fullStr Clarifying the neural substrates of threat and safety reversal learning in humans
title_full_unstemmed Clarifying the neural substrates of threat and safety reversal learning in humans
title_short Clarifying the neural substrates of threat and safety reversal learning in humans
title_sort clarifying the neural substrates of threat and safety reversal learning in humans
topic Threat
Safety
Reversal learning
Fear conditioning
Ventromedial prefrontal cortex
Anterior cingulate cortex
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811919310183
work_keys_str_mv AT hannahssavage clarifyingtheneuralsubstratesofthreatandsafetyreversallearninginhumans
AT christophergdavey clarifyingtheneuralsubstratesofthreatandsafetyreversallearninginhumans
AT miquelafullana clarifyingtheneuralsubstratesofthreatandsafetyreversallearninginhumans
AT benjharrison clarifyingtheneuralsubstratesofthreatandsafetyreversallearninginhumans