Human-technology relations in an age of surveillance capitalism: Towards an anthropological theory of the dialectic between analogue and digital humanity

What can anthropology contribute to the current debates about the negative effects of social media on people? Starting from a critique of anthropological work that sees human subjectivity and culture as ontologically unaffected by social media use, I propose that human engagement with these digital...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vito Laterza
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: CLUEB 2022-01-01
Series:EtnoAntropologia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rivisteclueb.it/index.php/etnoantropologia/article/view/381
_version_ 1811165536510279680
author Vito Laterza
author_facet Vito Laterza
author_sort Vito Laterza
collection DOAJ
description What can anthropology contribute to the current debates about the negative effects of social media on people? Starting from a critique of anthropological work that sees human subjectivity and culture as ontologically unaffected by social media use, I propose that human engagement with these digital technologies produces significant ontological transformations that deserve more attention. I develop my analysis in dialogue with Boellstorff’s ontology of the digital, Nardi’s theorisation of virtuality and affordances, and Zuboff’s formulation of surveillance capitalism, and I use empirical illustrations from the Cambridge Analytica data scandal to highlight key theoretical junctures. My main contribution is an outline of an anthropological theory of the dialectic between what I call analogue humanity and digital humanity. The two are mutually constituted but ontologically distinct. In the current political economy of digitalisation, tech companies are driving a process of increasing substitution of analogue humanity and forms of life with digital ones, as part of their quest for accurate prediction and social engineering of all aspects of human behaviour. While an anti-technology stance is neither practicable nor desirable, anthropologists need to think about how analogue humanity can be preserved and nurtured so that it can avoid ontological extinction.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T15:38:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-367b81dfefca4ce18f02506a210f86c6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2284-0176
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T15:38:36Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher CLUEB
record_format Article
series EtnoAntropologia
spelling doaj.art-367b81dfefca4ce18f02506a210f86c62023-02-12T19:08:03ZengCLUEBEtnoAntropologia2284-01762022-01-0192Human-technology relations in an age of surveillance capitalism: Towards an anthropological theory of the dialectic between analogue and digital humanityVito Laterza0Department of Global Development and Planning & Centre for Digital Transformation (CeDiT), University of Agder (Norway); Centre for Education Rights and Transformation (CERT), University of Johannesburg (South Africa). What can anthropology contribute to the current debates about the negative effects of social media on people? Starting from a critique of anthropological work that sees human subjectivity and culture as ontologically unaffected by social media use, I propose that human engagement with these digital technologies produces significant ontological transformations that deserve more attention. I develop my analysis in dialogue with Boellstorff’s ontology of the digital, Nardi’s theorisation of virtuality and affordances, and Zuboff’s formulation of surveillance capitalism, and I use empirical illustrations from the Cambridge Analytica data scandal to highlight key theoretical junctures. My main contribution is an outline of an anthropological theory of the dialectic between what I call analogue humanity and digital humanity. The two are mutually constituted but ontologically distinct. In the current political economy of digitalisation, tech companies are driving a process of increasing substitution of analogue humanity and forms of life with digital ones, as part of their quest for accurate prediction and social engineering of all aspects of human behaviour. While an anti-technology stance is neither practicable nor desirable, anthropologists need to think about how analogue humanity can be preserved and nurtured so that it can avoid ontological extinction. https://rivisteclueb.it/index.php/etnoantropologia/article/view/381Digitalisationdigital anthropologysubjectivityhumanityCambridge Analytica
spellingShingle Vito Laterza
Human-technology relations in an age of surveillance capitalism: Towards an anthropological theory of the dialectic between analogue and digital humanity
EtnoAntropologia
Digitalisation
digital anthropology
subjectivity
humanity
Cambridge Analytica
title Human-technology relations in an age of surveillance capitalism: Towards an anthropological theory of the dialectic between analogue and digital humanity
title_full Human-technology relations in an age of surveillance capitalism: Towards an anthropological theory of the dialectic between analogue and digital humanity
title_fullStr Human-technology relations in an age of surveillance capitalism: Towards an anthropological theory of the dialectic between analogue and digital humanity
title_full_unstemmed Human-technology relations in an age of surveillance capitalism: Towards an anthropological theory of the dialectic between analogue and digital humanity
title_short Human-technology relations in an age of surveillance capitalism: Towards an anthropological theory of the dialectic between analogue and digital humanity
title_sort human technology relations in an age of surveillance capitalism towards an anthropological theory of the dialectic between analogue and digital humanity
topic Digitalisation
digital anthropology
subjectivity
humanity
Cambridge Analytica
url https://rivisteclueb.it/index.php/etnoantropologia/article/view/381
work_keys_str_mv AT vitolaterza humantechnologyrelationsinanageofsurveillancecapitalismtowardsananthropologicaltheoryofthedialecticbetweenanalogueanddigitalhumanity