Self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review
Objectives The aim of this scoping review was to review existing self-reported instruments measuring different elements of domains of PL.Method We reviewed Education Research Complete, Cochrane, Medline, ScienceDirect, Scopus and SPORTDiscus. The reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022-09-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Open |
| Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/9/e058351.full |
| _version_ | 1811182350685437952 |
|---|---|
| author | Nikos Ntoumanis Stephanie Schoeppe Helle Terkildsen Maindal Knud Ryom Glen Nielsen Anne-Sofie Hargaard Paulina Sander Melby Peter Bentsen Peter Elsborg |
| author_facet | Nikos Ntoumanis Stephanie Schoeppe Helle Terkildsen Maindal Knud Ryom Glen Nielsen Anne-Sofie Hargaard Paulina Sander Melby Peter Bentsen Peter Elsborg |
| author_sort | Nikos Ntoumanis |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objectives The aim of this scoping review was to review existing self-reported instruments measuring different elements of domains of PL.Method We reviewed Education Research Complete, Cochrane, Medline, ScienceDirect, Scopus and SPORTDiscus. The reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Studies were coded using a thematic framework, which was based on the three domains of PL. The eligibility criteria were as follows: (1) age groups between 18 and 60 years; (2) meta-analyses, reviews or quantitative studies focusing on the measurement of at least one of the three domains of PL and (3) instrument that was self-reported. We finalised search on 1 August 2021Results In total, 67 articles were identified as studies describing instruments reflecting the three domains of PL. Following full-text reading, 21 articles that met our inclusion criteria were included. Several instruments of relevance to PL are available for assessing motivation, confidence and the physical domain. However, few instruments exist that measure elements of the cognitive domain.Conclusion This review showed that a range of existing and validated instruments exists, covering two out of the three domains of PL, namely affective and physical domains. However, for the knowledge domain no valid measurement tools could be found. This scoping review has identified gaps in the research (namely the cognitive domain) and also a gap in the research as no measures that consider the inter-relatedness of the three domains (holistic nature of the concept). |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T09:31:03Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-3681904d07a94990ad3848d4d31a98e4 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2044-6055 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T09:31:03Z |
| publishDate | 2022-09-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMJ Open |
| spelling | doaj.art-3681904d07a94990ad3848d4d31a98e42022-12-22T04:31:53ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552022-09-0112910.1136/bmjopen-2021-058351Self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping reviewNikos Ntoumanis0Stephanie Schoeppe1Helle Terkildsen Maindal2Knud Ryom3Glen Nielsen4Anne-Sofie Hargaard5Paulina Sander Melby6Peter Bentsen7Peter Elsborg8Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Danish Centre for Motivation and Behavior Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, DenmarkQueensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, AustraliaDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DenmarkDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DenmarkDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavns, DenmarkDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DenmarkHealth Promotion Research, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, DenmarkCenter for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg Research Unit, Kobenhavn, DenmarkHealth Promotion Research, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, DenmarkObjectives The aim of this scoping review was to review existing self-reported instruments measuring different elements of domains of PL.Method We reviewed Education Research Complete, Cochrane, Medline, ScienceDirect, Scopus and SPORTDiscus. The reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Studies were coded using a thematic framework, which was based on the three domains of PL. The eligibility criteria were as follows: (1) age groups between 18 and 60 years; (2) meta-analyses, reviews or quantitative studies focusing on the measurement of at least one of the three domains of PL and (3) instrument that was self-reported. We finalised search on 1 August 2021Results In total, 67 articles were identified as studies describing instruments reflecting the three domains of PL. Following full-text reading, 21 articles that met our inclusion criteria were included. Several instruments of relevance to PL are available for assessing motivation, confidence and the physical domain. However, few instruments exist that measure elements of the cognitive domain.Conclusion This review showed that a range of existing and validated instruments exists, covering two out of the three domains of PL, namely affective and physical domains. However, for the knowledge domain no valid measurement tools could be found. This scoping review has identified gaps in the research (namely the cognitive domain) and also a gap in the research as no measures that consider the inter-relatedness of the three domains (holistic nature of the concept).https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/9/e058351.full |
| spellingShingle | Nikos Ntoumanis Stephanie Schoeppe Helle Terkildsen Maindal Knud Ryom Glen Nielsen Anne-Sofie Hargaard Paulina Sander Melby Peter Bentsen Peter Elsborg Self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review BMJ Open |
| title | Self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review |
| title_full | Self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review |
| title_fullStr | Self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review |
| title_short | Self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review |
| title_sort | self reported measurements of physical literacy in adults a scoping review |
| url | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/9/e058351.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nikosntoumanis selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview AT stephanieschoeppe selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview AT helleterkildsenmaindal selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview AT knudryom selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview AT glennielsen selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview AT annesofiehargaard selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview AT paulinasandermelby selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview AT peterbentsen selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview AT peterelsborg selfreportedmeasurementsofphysicalliteracyinadultsascopingreview |