Policing Farm Animal Welfare in Federated Nations: The Problem of Dual Federalism in Canada and the USA

In recent European animal welfare statutes, human actions injurious to animals are new “offences” articulated as an injury to societal norms in addition to property damage. A crime is foremost a violation of a community moral standard. Violating a societal norm puts society out of balance and justic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Terry L. Whiting
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2013-12-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/3/4/1086
_version_ 1818561689476399104
author Terry L. Whiting
author_facet Terry L. Whiting
author_sort Terry L. Whiting
collection DOAJ
description In recent European animal welfare statutes, human actions injurious to animals are new “offences” articulated as an injury to societal norms in addition to property damage. A crime is foremost a violation of a community moral standard. Violating a societal norm puts society out of balance and justice is served when that balance is returned. Criminal law normally requires the presence of mens rea, or evil intent, a particular state of mind; however, dereliction of duties towards animals (or children) is usually described as being of varying levels of negligence but, rarely can be so egregious that it constitutes criminal societal injury. In instrumental justice, the “public goods” delivered by criminal law are commonly classified as retribution, incapacitation and general deterrence. Prevention is a small, if present, outcome of criminal justice. Quazi-criminal law intends to establish certain expected (moral) standards of human behavior where by statute, the obligations of one party to another are clearly articulated as strict liability. Although largely moral in nature, this class of laws focuses on achieving compliance, thereby resulting in prevention. For example, protecting the environment from degradation is a benefit to society; punishing non-compliance, as is the application of criminal law, will not prevent the injury. This paper will provide evidence that the integrated meat complex of Canada and the USA is not in a good position to make changes to implement a credible farm animal protection system.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T00:54:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-368c8958f083462ab1ca2a4b666b144c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T00:54:08Z
publishDate 2013-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-368c8958f083462ab1ca2a4b666b144c2022-12-21T23:23:39ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152013-12-01341086112210.3390/ani3041086ani3041086Policing Farm Animal Welfare in Federated Nations: The Problem of Dual Federalism in Canada and the USATerry L. Whiting0Office of the Chief Veterinarian, Manitoba Agriculture Food and Rural Initiatives, 545 University Crescent, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 5S6In recent European animal welfare statutes, human actions injurious to animals are new “offences” articulated as an injury to societal norms in addition to property damage. A crime is foremost a violation of a community moral standard. Violating a societal norm puts society out of balance and justice is served when that balance is returned. Criminal law normally requires the presence of mens rea, or evil intent, a particular state of mind; however, dereliction of duties towards animals (or children) is usually described as being of varying levels of negligence but, rarely can be so egregious that it constitutes criminal societal injury. In instrumental justice, the “public goods” delivered by criminal law are commonly classified as retribution, incapacitation and general deterrence. Prevention is a small, if present, outcome of criminal justice. Quazi-criminal law intends to establish certain expected (moral) standards of human behavior where by statute, the obligations of one party to another are clearly articulated as strict liability. Although largely moral in nature, this class of laws focuses on achieving compliance, thereby resulting in prevention. For example, protecting the environment from degradation is a benefit to society; punishing non-compliance, as is the application of criminal law, will not prevent the injury. This paper will provide evidence that the integrated meat complex of Canada and the USA is not in a good position to make changes to implement a credible farm animal protection system.http://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/3/4/1086animal lawCriminal lawlaw enforcementpolicingChristian inquisitionSPCAmethod of productionanimal crueltydivision of powersfundamentalismzealot
spellingShingle Terry L. Whiting
Policing Farm Animal Welfare in Federated Nations: The Problem of Dual Federalism in Canada and the USA
Animals
animal law
Criminal law
law enforcement
policing
Christian inquisition
SPCA
method of production
animal cruelty
division of powers
fundamentalism
zealot
title Policing Farm Animal Welfare in Federated Nations: The Problem of Dual Federalism in Canada and the USA
title_full Policing Farm Animal Welfare in Federated Nations: The Problem of Dual Federalism in Canada and the USA
title_fullStr Policing Farm Animal Welfare in Federated Nations: The Problem of Dual Federalism in Canada and the USA
title_full_unstemmed Policing Farm Animal Welfare in Federated Nations: The Problem of Dual Federalism in Canada and the USA
title_short Policing Farm Animal Welfare in Federated Nations: The Problem of Dual Federalism in Canada and the USA
title_sort policing farm animal welfare in federated nations the problem of dual federalism in canada and the usa
topic animal law
Criminal law
law enforcement
policing
Christian inquisition
SPCA
method of production
animal cruelty
division of powers
fundamentalism
zealot
url http://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/3/4/1086
work_keys_str_mv AT terrylwhiting policingfarmanimalwelfareinfederatednationstheproblemofdualfederalismincanadaandtheusa