Gingival microleakage in class II composite restorations using different flowable composites as liner: an in vitro evaluation

Gingival microleakage in class II composite restorations using different flowable composites as liner: an in vitro evaluation

Introduction: One of the main disadvantages of composites is marginal microleakage using flowable composites as a liner beneath composite restorations has been recommended to reduce microleakage. The aim of this study was to assess the microleakage of class II restorations with different flowable co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Neda Lotfi, Behnaz Esmaeili, Ghazaleh Ahmadizenouz, Ali Bijani, Hadi Khadem
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Babol University of Medical Sciences 2015-03-01
Series:	Caspian journal of dental research
Subjects:	Composite resins Dental leakage Dental cavity lining Polymerization
Online Access:	http://cjdr.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-180-1&slc_lang=en&sid=1

Similar Items

Comparative Evaluation of microleakage of Bulk-fill and Posterior Composite Resins Using the Incremental Technique and a Liner in Cl II Restorations
by: Samaneh Doustfateme, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Effect of Different Placement Techniques on Microleakage of Class V Composite Restorations
by: M. Moezyzadeh, et al.
Published: (2009-09-01)

Microleakage of dual-cured adhesive systems in class v composite resin restorations.
by: S Kasraie, et al.
Published: (2012-06-01)

Comparison of self-adhering flowable composite microleakage with several types of bonding agent in class V cavity restoration
by: Atefeh Yousefi Jordehi, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

Effect of using different base materials on microleakage of class V restorations
by: İhsan Yıkılgan, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

Effect of cyclic loading on microleakage of silorane based composite compared with low shrinkage methacrylate-based composites
by: Hamid Kermanshah, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

The Effect of Occlusal Loading on Gingival Microleakage of Bulk Fill Composites Compared with a Conventional Composite
by: Razieh Hoseinifar, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01)

Repair of amalgam restorations with composite resin and bonded amalgam: A microleakage study
by: Daniela Araújo Veloso Popoff, et al.
Published: (2011-01-01)

Comparison of Microleakage of a Self-adhesive Composite with a Conventional Flowable Composite and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Class V Restorations
by: Maryam Mofidi, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)

Comparison of Dentinal Microleakage of Class II Composite Restorations Using Universal Bonding: Self-Etch and Selective-Etch of Enamel, with and without Liner
by: F Golesorkhtabar, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01)

Microleakage of Class II Combined Amalgam-Composite Restorations Using Different Composites and Bonding Agents
by: F. Sharafeddin, et al.
Published: (2008-09-01)

Effects of Rinsing Water Temperature and Preheated Composites on Microleakage of Composite Restorations with Two Bonding Agents
by: Mohammad Reza Malekipour, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Effect of Thermocycling on Microleakage of Class V Resin Composite Restorations Bonded by Self and Total Etch Bondings
by: AR Daneshkazemi, et al.
Published: (2011-03-01)

In vitro microleakage at the enamel and dentin margins of class II cavities of primary molars restored with a bulk‐fill and a conventional composite
by: Shahram Mosharrafian, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01)

Effect of Lactic Acid on Microleakage of Class V Low-Shrinkage Composite Restorations
by: Sedigheh Sadat Hashemikamangar, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01)

Sealing Carious Fissures with Resin Infiltrant in Association with a Flowable Composite Reduces Immediate Microleakage?
by: Vanessa Brígido da Silva, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01)

Evaluating the Microshear Bond Strength and Microleakage of Flowable Composites Containing Zinc Oxide Nano-particles
by: Koorosh Teymoornezhad, et al.
Published: (2016-11-01)

Comparative evaluation of self-adhering flowable and conventional flowable composites using different adhesive systems
by: Maede Rahmanifard, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01)

Microleakage comparison of three types of adhesive systems versus GIC-based adhesive in class V composite restorations
by: Mostafa Sadeghi
Published: (2016-06-01)

Evaluation of microleakage in composite restorations after several aging periods
by: Carla Grimaneza Molina-Pule, et al.
Published: (2015-11-01)

The effect of powder/liquid ratio on microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer
by: Sepide Ostadi Joybari, et al.
Published: (2017-03-01)

Effect of Chlorhexidine on Microleakage of Composite
by: F. Darabi, et al.
Published: (2009-03-01)

A perspective of marginal microleakage in class II composite resin restorations using different types and techniques: an in-vitro study
by: Bassam Alasbahi
Published: (2019-02-01)

Effect of Saliva Contamination on Microleakage of Open Sandwich Restorations
by: Çiğdem Çelik, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Comparison of microleakage of an alkasite restorative material, a composite resin and a resin-modified glass ionomer
by: Fariba Motevasselian, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)

The effect of mechanical load cycling and polishing time on microleakage of class V glass-ionomer and composite restorations: A scanning electron microscopy evaluation
by: Mansoreh Mirzaie, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01)

Effect of Mechanical Load Cycling on Microleakage of Restorative Glass Ionomers Compared to Flowable Composite Resin in Class V Cavities
by: Zahra Hasani, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01)

Effect of a Resin Coating Material on the Microleakage of Class V Restorations With or Without Post-Operative Bleaching
by: Samira Hajilou, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01)

Microleakage Evaluation of Class II Composite Resin Restorations with Different Thicknesses of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer
by: Horieh Moosavi, et al.
Published: (2018-07-01)

Microleakage in Sub-Gingival Class II Preparations Restored Using Two Different Liners for Open Sandwich Technique Supplemented With or Without Ultrasonic Agitation: An In Vitro Study
by: Hitesh Chandar Gyanani, et al.
Published: (2016-03-01)

Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Flowable Composite Resin Using Etch and Rinse, Self-Etch Adhesive Systems, and Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite Resin in Class V Cavities: Confocal Laser Microscopic Study
by: Ekta Varma Sengar, et al.
Published: (2022-07-01)

In Vitro Microleakage Comparison of Flowable Nanocomposites and Conventional Materials Used in Pit and Fissure Sealant Therapy
by: Sara Arastoo, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

Degree of conversion of a flowable composite light-activated through ceramics of different shades and thicknesses
by: Adilson Yoshio Furuse, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Comparative evaluation of microleakage of composite restorations using fifth and seventh generations of adhesive systems
by: Mitra Tabari, et al.
Published: (2014-09-01)

Effect of acid etching of glass ionomer cement surface on the microleakage of sandwich restorations
by: Álvaro Della Bona, et al.
Published: (2007-06-01)

Evaluation of Diode laser (940 nm) irradiation effect on microleakage in class V composite restoration before and after adhesive application
by: loghman rezaei, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01)

Evaluation of microleakage in Class II composite restorations: Bonded-base and bulk-fill techniques
by: Atiyeh Feiz, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

Comparison of coronal sealing of flowable composite, resin-modified glass ionomer, and mineral trioxide aggregate in endodontically treated teeth: An in-vitro study
by: Mahla Tavakoli, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01)

Surface Micro-Hardness and Wear Resistance of a Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite in Comparison to Conventional Flowable Composites
by: Fateme Azizi, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01)

Marginal Microleakage of Conventional Fissure Sealants and Self-Adhering Flowable Composite as Fissure Sealant in Permanent Teeth
by: Sara Rahimian-Imam, et al.
Published: (2016-02-01)