<b>Validity and reliability of an instrument to measure barriers to bike use in adults.</b> http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2012v14n6p624
The purpose of this study was to analyze the validity and reliability of an instrument to assess the perception of barriers related to bicycling for leisure and transportation in adults. The items composing the instrument were selected from the literature review on the subject. Content validity was...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
2012-11-01
|
Series: | Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2012v14n6p624/23085 |
_version_ | 1819150964272136192 |
---|---|
author | Marilson Kienteka Cassiano Ricardo Rech Rogério Cesar Fermino Rodrigo Siqueira Reis |
author_facet | Marilson Kienteka Cassiano Ricardo Rech Rogério Cesar Fermino Rodrigo Siqueira Reis |
author_sort | Marilson Kienteka |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The purpose of this study was to analyze the validity and reliability of an instrument to assess the perception of barriers related to bicycling for leisure and transportation in adults. The items composing the instrument were selected from the literature review on the subject. Content validity was analyzed by consulting experts in physical activity field. The reliability was assessed through internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), kappa coefficient and relative agreement in a sample of 66 adults (18-79 years old) selected from three census tracts in Curitiba-PR. Data were analyzed using SPSS 17.0, with a significance level of 5%. Most of the sample consisted of women (60%), aged 40 years (47%) and intermediate socioeconomic level (68%). The frequency of bicycling in leisure time was higher than for transportation means (15.2 vs 7.6%). The internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) was significant, both in leisure time (α=0.77) and transportation (α=0.82). The agreement was higher for leisure (80.3 to 93.9%) than compared to commuting (76.9 to 90.8%). Kappa values were moderate to high (leisure: 0.41 to 0.82: commuting: 0.53 to 0.82). The ICC sub-scores were 0.93 (CI95%: 0.88 to 0.96) and 0.89 (CI95%: 0.82 to 0.94) for leisure and transport, respectively. It follows that the instrument has psychometric quality suitable for measuring the barriers to bicycle use in adults. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-22T14:25:52Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-369481a557204fd893afd5f5dd1c2fac |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1415-8426 1980-0037 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-22T14:25:52Z |
publishDate | 2012-11-01 |
publisher | Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
record_format | Article |
series | Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano |
spelling | doaj.art-369481a557204fd893afd5f5dd1c2fac2022-12-21T18:22:52ZengUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaRevista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano1415-84261980-00372012-11-01146624635<b>Validity and reliability of an instrument to measure barriers to bike use in adults.</b> http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2012v14n6p624Marilson KientekaCassiano Ricardo RechRogério Cesar FerminoRodrigo Siqueira ReisThe purpose of this study was to analyze the validity and reliability of an instrument to assess the perception of barriers related to bicycling for leisure and transportation in adults. The items composing the instrument were selected from the literature review on the subject. Content validity was analyzed by consulting experts in physical activity field. The reliability was assessed through internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), kappa coefficient and relative agreement in a sample of 66 adults (18-79 years old) selected from three census tracts in Curitiba-PR. Data were analyzed using SPSS 17.0, with a significance level of 5%. Most of the sample consisted of women (60%), aged 40 years (47%) and intermediate socioeconomic level (68%). The frequency of bicycling in leisure time was higher than for transportation means (15.2 vs 7.6%). The internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) was significant, both in leisure time (α=0.77) and transportation (α=0.82). The agreement was higher for leisure (80.3 to 93.9%) than compared to commuting (76.9 to 90.8%). Kappa values were moderate to high (leisure: 0.41 to 0.82: commuting: 0.53 to 0.82). The ICC sub-scores were 0.93 (CI95%: 0.88 to 0.96) and 0.89 (CI95%: 0.82 to 0.94) for leisure and transport, respectively. It follows that the instrument has psychometric quality suitable for measuring the barriers to bicycle use in adults.http://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2012v14n6p624/23085BicyclingCommutingFacilities accessLeisure activityAtividades de lazerCiclismoDeslocamentoEstruturas de acesso. |
spellingShingle | Marilson Kienteka Cassiano Ricardo Rech Rogério Cesar Fermino Rodrigo Siqueira Reis <b>Validity and reliability of an instrument to measure barriers to bike use in adults.</b> http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2012v14n6p624 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano Bicycling Commuting Facilities access Leisure activity Atividades de lazer Ciclismo Deslocamento Estruturas de acesso. |
title | <b>Validity and reliability of an instrument to measure barriers to bike use in adults.</b> http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2012v14n6p624 |
title_full | <b>Validity and reliability of an instrument to measure barriers to bike use in adults.</b> http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2012v14n6p624 |
title_fullStr | <b>Validity and reliability of an instrument to measure barriers to bike use in adults.</b> http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2012v14n6p624 |
title_full_unstemmed | <b>Validity and reliability of an instrument to measure barriers to bike use in adults.</b> http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2012v14n6p624 |
title_short | <b>Validity and reliability of an instrument to measure barriers to bike use in adults.</b> http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2012v14n6p624 |
title_sort | b validity and reliability of an instrument to measure barriers to bike use in adults b http dx doi org 10 5007 1980 0037 2012v14n6p624 |
topic | Bicycling Commuting Facilities access Leisure activity Atividades de lazer Ciclismo Deslocamento Estruturas de acesso. |
url | http://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2012v14n6p624/23085 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marilsonkienteka bvalidityandreliabilityofaninstrumenttomeasurebarrierstobikeuseinadultsbhttpdxdoiorg105007198000372012v14n6p624 AT cassianoricardorech bvalidityandreliabilityofaninstrumenttomeasurebarrierstobikeuseinadultsbhttpdxdoiorg105007198000372012v14n6p624 AT rogeriocesarfermino bvalidityandreliabilityofaninstrumenttomeasurebarrierstobikeuseinadultsbhttpdxdoiorg105007198000372012v14n6p624 AT rodrigosiqueirareis bvalidityandreliabilityofaninstrumenttomeasurebarrierstobikeuseinadultsbhttpdxdoiorg105007198000372012v14n6p624 |