Self‐constraining of low‐energy rivers explains low channel mobility and tortuous planforms

Abstract Meandering rivers are abundant on Earth, from the largest rivers to the smallest tributaries. The classical view of meandering rivers is a sinuous planform with rounded bends, which grow and migrate until they are cut‐off. However, many low‐energy meandering rivers have planforms that are m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jasper H. J. Candel, Bart Makaske, Niels Kijm, Maarten G. Kleinhans, Joep E. A. Storms, Jakob Wallinga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-09-01
Series:The Depositional Record
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/dep2.112
_version_ 1818575700363313152
author Jasper H. J. Candel
Bart Makaske
Niels Kijm
Maarten G. Kleinhans
Joep E. A. Storms
Jakob Wallinga
author_facet Jasper H. J. Candel
Bart Makaske
Niels Kijm
Maarten G. Kleinhans
Joep E. A. Storms
Jakob Wallinga
author_sort Jasper H. J. Candel
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Meandering rivers are abundant on Earth, from the largest rivers to the smallest tributaries. The classical view of meandering rivers is a sinuous planform with rounded bends, which grow and migrate until they are cut‐off. However, many low‐energy meandering rivers have planforms that are much more complex than this classical view due to the heterogeneity of their alluvium, and show relatively limited channel migration. Based on a detailed palaeogeographic study of the Dommel River in The Netherlands, it is inferred that low‐energy meandering rivers may develop tortuous planforms with sharp bends, owing to self‐formed deposits that increasingly constrain the channel mobility. This mechanism is corroborated by data from 47 meandering river reaches of varied scale from around the world, which show that erosion‐resistant floodplain deposits are preserved in the river banks when the river energy is below a critical threshold. The term ‘self‐constraining’ is proposed for low‐energy rivers where an increase in bank stability over time results in progressive tortuous planforms and reduced mobility. A conceptual model, based on the dataset, shows that the increase in bank stability over time also increases the energy required to break out of the tendency to self‐constrain. Self‐constraining thereby enhances the resilience of the system to bank erosion, while an unexpected increase in bank erosion may occur if river energy exceeds the critical threshold. This study provides a novel explanation for the evolution of low‐energy river planforms and dynamics, and provides new insights on their responses to climate changes.
first_indexed 2024-12-15T00:44:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-36ae782b76104d859307e3087a69a57a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2055-4877
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-15T00:44:29Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Depositional Record
spelling doaj.art-36ae782b76104d859307e3087a69a57a2022-12-21T22:41:35ZengWileyThe Depositional Record2055-48772020-09-016364866910.1002/dep2.112Self‐constraining of low‐energy rivers explains low channel mobility and tortuous planformsJasper H. J. Candel0Bart Makaske1Niels Kijm2Maarten G. Kleinhans3Joep E. A. Storms4Jakob Wallinga5Soil Geography and Landscape Group Wageningen University and Research Wageningen The NetherlandsSoil Geography and Landscape Group Wageningen University and Research Wageningen The NetherlandsSoil Geography and Landscape Group Wageningen University and Research Wageningen The NetherlandsDepartment of Physical Geography Faculty of Geosciences Utrecht University Utrecht The NetherlandsFaculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences Delft University of Technology Delft The NetherlandsSoil Geography and Landscape Group Wageningen University and Research Wageningen The NetherlandsAbstract Meandering rivers are abundant on Earth, from the largest rivers to the smallest tributaries. The classical view of meandering rivers is a sinuous planform with rounded bends, which grow and migrate until they are cut‐off. However, many low‐energy meandering rivers have planforms that are much more complex than this classical view due to the heterogeneity of their alluvium, and show relatively limited channel migration. Based on a detailed palaeogeographic study of the Dommel River in The Netherlands, it is inferred that low‐energy meandering rivers may develop tortuous planforms with sharp bends, owing to self‐formed deposits that increasingly constrain the channel mobility. This mechanism is corroborated by data from 47 meandering river reaches of varied scale from around the world, which show that erosion‐resistant floodplain deposits are preserved in the river banks when the river energy is below a critical threshold. The term ‘self‐constraining’ is proposed for low‐energy rivers where an increase in bank stability over time results in progressive tortuous planforms and reduced mobility. A conceptual model, based on the dataset, shows that the increase in bank stability over time also increases the energy required to break out of the tendency to self‐constrain. Self‐constraining thereby enhances the resilience of the system to bank erosion, while an unexpected increase in bank erosion may occur if river energy exceeds the critical threshold. This study provides a novel explanation for the evolution of low‐energy river planforms and dynamics, and provides new insights on their responses to climate changes.https://doi.org/10.1002/dep2.112fluvial morphologyheterogeneous floodplain architectureHoloceneriver channel planform
spellingShingle Jasper H. J. Candel
Bart Makaske
Niels Kijm
Maarten G. Kleinhans
Joep E. A. Storms
Jakob Wallinga
Self‐constraining of low‐energy rivers explains low channel mobility and tortuous planforms
The Depositional Record
fluvial morphology
heterogeneous floodplain architecture
Holocene
river channel planform
title Self‐constraining of low‐energy rivers explains low channel mobility and tortuous planforms
title_full Self‐constraining of low‐energy rivers explains low channel mobility and tortuous planforms
title_fullStr Self‐constraining of low‐energy rivers explains low channel mobility and tortuous planforms
title_full_unstemmed Self‐constraining of low‐energy rivers explains low channel mobility and tortuous planforms
title_short Self‐constraining of low‐energy rivers explains low channel mobility and tortuous planforms
title_sort self constraining of low energy rivers explains low channel mobility and tortuous planforms
topic fluvial morphology
heterogeneous floodplain architecture
Holocene
river channel planform
url https://doi.org/10.1002/dep2.112
work_keys_str_mv AT jasperhjcandel selfconstrainingoflowenergyriversexplainslowchannelmobilityandtortuousplanforms
AT bartmakaske selfconstrainingoflowenergyriversexplainslowchannelmobilityandtortuousplanforms
AT nielskijm selfconstrainingoflowenergyriversexplainslowchannelmobilityandtortuousplanforms
AT maartengkleinhans selfconstrainingoflowenergyriversexplainslowchannelmobilityandtortuousplanforms
AT joepeastorms selfconstrainingoflowenergyriversexplainslowchannelmobilityandtortuousplanforms
AT jakobwallinga selfconstrainingoflowenergyriversexplainslowchannelmobilityandtortuousplanforms