The closure temperature(s) of zircon Raman dating

<p>Zircon Raman dating based on irradiation damage is a debated concept but not an established geo-/thermochronological method. One issue is the temperature range of radiation-damage annealing over geological timescales. We conducted isochronal and isothermal annealing experiments on radiatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. Härtel, R. Jonckheere, B. Wauschkuhn, L. Ratschbacher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2021-05-01
Series:Geochronology
Online Access:https://gchron.copernicus.org/articles/3/259/2021/gchron-3-259-2021.pdf
Description
Summary:<p>Zircon Raman dating based on irradiation damage is a debated concept but not an established geo-/thermochronological method. One issue is the temperature range of radiation-damage annealing over geological timescales. We conducted isochronal and isothermal annealing experiments on radiation-damaged zircons between 500 and 1000 <span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span>C for durations between 10 min and 5 d to describe the annealing kinetics. We measured the widths (<span class="inline-formula">Γ</span>) and positions (<span class="inline-formula"><i>ω</i></span>) of the <span class="inline-formula"><i>ν</i><sub>1</sub></span>(SiO<span class="inline-formula"><sub>4</sub></span>), <span class="inline-formula"><i>ν</i><sub>2</sub></span>(SiO<span class="inline-formula"><sub>4</sub></span>), and <span class="inline-formula"><i>ν</i><sub>3</sub></span>(SiO<span class="inline-formula"><sub>4</sub></span>) internal Raman bands, and the external rotation Raman band at <span class="inline-formula">∼974</span>, 438, 1008, and 356 cm<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span> after each annealing step. We fitted a Johnson–Mehl–Avrami–Kolmogorov and a distributed activation energy model to the fractional annealing data, calculated from the widths of the <span class="inline-formula"><i>ν</i><sub>2</sub></span>(SiO<span class="inline-formula"><sub>4</sub></span>), <span class="inline-formula"><i>ν</i><sub>3</sub></span>(SiO<span class="inline-formula"><sub>4</sub></span>), and external rotation bands. From the kinetic models, we determined closure temperatures <span class="inline-formula"><i>T</i><sub>c</sub></span> for damage accumulation for each Raman band. <span class="inline-formula"><i>T</i><sub>c</sub></span> ranges from 330 to 370 <span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span>C for the internal <span class="inline-formula"><i>ν</i><sub>2</sub></span>(SiO<span class="inline-formula"><sub>4</sub></span>) and <span class="inline-formula"><i>ν</i><sub>3</sub></span>(SiO<span class="inline-formula"><sub>4</sub></span>) bands; the external rotation band is more sensitive to thermal annealing (<span class="inline-formula"><i>T</i><sub>c</sub>∼260</span> to 310 <span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span>C). Our estimates are in general agreement with previous ones, but more geological evidence is needed to validate the results. The <span class="inline-formula"><i>T</i><sub>c</sub></span> difference for the different Raman bands offers the prospect of a multi-closure-temperature zircon Raman thermochronometer.</p>
ISSN:2628-3719