Ultra-low tidal volume ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation shows no mitigating effect on pulmonary end-organ damage compared to standard ventilation: insights from a porcine model

Abstract Objective This study aimed to determine whether ultra-low tidal volume ventilation (ULTVV) applied during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) compared with standard ventilation (intermittent positive pressure ventilation, IPPV) can reduce pulmonary end-organ damage in the post-resuscitation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katja Mohnke, Philipp Conzelmann, Miriam Renz, Julian Riedel, René Rissel, Andrea Urmann, Johanna Hain, Bastian Duenges, Alexander Ziebart, Robert Ruemmler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2023-11-01
Series:Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-023-00568-6
_version_ 1827635832247287808
author Katja Mohnke
Philipp Conzelmann
Miriam Renz
Julian Riedel
René Rissel
Andrea Urmann
Johanna Hain
Bastian Duenges
Alexander Ziebart
Robert Ruemmler
author_facet Katja Mohnke
Philipp Conzelmann
Miriam Renz
Julian Riedel
René Rissel
Andrea Urmann
Johanna Hain
Bastian Duenges
Alexander Ziebart
Robert Ruemmler
author_sort Katja Mohnke
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective This study aimed to determine whether ultra-low tidal volume ventilation (ULTVV) applied during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) compared with standard ventilation (intermittent positive pressure ventilation, IPPV) can reduce pulmonary end-organ damage in the post-resuscitation period. Methods A prospective, randomized trial was conducted using a porcine model (n = 45). The animals were divided into three groups: IPPV, ULTVV, and a sham control group. Juvenile male pigs underwent CPR after inducing ventricular fibrillation and received the designated ventilation intervention [IPPV: tidal volume 6–8 ml per kilogram body weight (ml/kg BW), respiratory rate 10/min, FiO2 1.0; ULTVV: tidal volume 2–3 ml/kg BW, respiratory rate 50/min, FiO2 1.0]. A 20-h observation period followed if return of spontaneous circulation was achieved. Histopathological examination using the diffuse alveolar damage scoring system was performed on postmortem lung tissue samples. Arterial and venous blood gas analyses and ventilation/perfusion measurements via multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET) were repeatedly recorded during the experiment. Results Out of the 45 experiments conducted, 28 animals were excluded based on predefined criteria. Histopathological analysis showed no significant differences in lung damage between the ULTVV and IPPV groups. ULTVV demonstrated adequate oxygenation and decarboxylation. MIGET measurements during and after resuscitation revealed no significant differences between the intervention groups. Conclusion In the short-term follow-up phase, ULTVV demonstrated similar histopathological changes and functional pulmonary parameters compared to standard ventilation. Further research is needed to investigate the long-term effects and clinical implications of ULTVV in resuscitation settings.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T15:32:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-36bb04e8503e4ae08f26576e75c5c655
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2197-425X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T15:32:58Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
spelling doaj.art-36bb04e8503e4ae08f26576e75c5c6552023-11-26T12:08:49ZengSpringerOpenIntensive Care Medicine Experimental2197-425X2023-11-0111111110.1186/s40635-023-00568-6Ultra-low tidal volume ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation shows no mitigating effect on pulmonary end-organ damage compared to standard ventilation: insights from a porcine modelKatja Mohnke0Philipp Conzelmann1Miriam Renz2Julian Riedel3René Rissel4Andrea Urmann5Johanna Hain6Bastian Duenges7Alexander Ziebart8Robert Ruemmler9Department of Anesthesiology, Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg UniversityAbstract Objective This study aimed to determine whether ultra-low tidal volume ventilation (ULTVV) applied during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) compared with standard ventilation (intermittent positive pressure ventilation, IPPV) can reduce pulmonary end-organ damage in the post-resuscitation period. Methods A prospective, randomized trial was conducted using a porcine model (n = 45). The animals were divided into three groups: IPPV, ULTVV, and a sham control group. Juvenile male pigs underwent CPR after inducing ventricular fibrillation and received the designated ventilation intervention [IPPV: tidal volume 6–8 ml per kilogram body weight (ml/kg BW), respiratory rate 10/min, FiO2 1.0; ULTVV: tidal volume 2–3 ml/kg BW, respiratory rate 50/min, FiO2 1.0]. A 20-h observation period followed if return of spontaneous circulation was achieved. Histopathological examination using the diffuse alveolar damage scoring system was performed on postmortem lung tissue samples. Arterial and venous blood gas analyses and ventilation/perfusion measurements via multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET) were repeatedly recorded during the experiment. Results Out of the 45 experiments conducted, 28 animals were excluded based on predefined criteria. Histopathological analysis showed no significant differences in lung damage between the ULTVV and IPPV groups. ULTVV demonstrated adequate oxygenation and decarboxylation. MIGET measurements during and after resuscitation revealed no significant differences between the intervention groups. Conclusion In the short-term follow-up phase, ULTVV demonstrated similar histopathological changes and functional pulmonary parameters compared to standard ventilation. Further research is needed to investigate the long-term effects and clinical implications of ULTVV in resuscitation settings.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-023-00568-6ResuscitationVentilationULTVVARDSMIGET
spellingShingle Katja Mohnke
Philipp Conzelmann
Miriam Renz
Julian Riedel
René Rissel
Andrea Urmann
Johanna Hain
Bastian Duenges
Alexander Ziebart
Robert Ruemmler
Ultra-low tidal volume ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation shows no mitigating effect on pulmonary end-organ damage compared to standard ventilation: insights from a porcine model
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Resuscitation
Ventilation
ULTVV
ARDS
MIGET
title Ultra-low tidal volume ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation shows no mitigating effect on pulmonary end-organ damage compared to standard ventilation: insights from a porcine model
title_full Ultra-low tidal volume ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation shows no mitigating effect on pulmonary end-organ damage compared to standard ventilation: insights from a porcine model
title_fullStr Ultra-low tidal volume ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation shows no mitigating effect on pulmonary end-organ damage compared to standard ventilation: insights from a porcine model
title_full_unstemmed Ultra-low tidal volume ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation shows no mitigating effect on pulmonary end-organ damage compared to standard ventilation: insights from a porcine model
title_short Ultra-low tidal volume ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation shows no mitigating effect on pulmonary end-organ damage compared to standard ventilation: insights from a porcine model
title_sort ultra low tidal volume ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation shows no mitigating effect on pulmonary end organ damage compared to standard ventilation insights from a porcine model
topic Resuscitation
Ventilation
ULTVV
ARDS
MIGET
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-023-00568-6
work_keys_str_mv AT katjamohnke ultralowtidalvolumeventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationshowsnomitigatingeffectonpulmonaryendorgandamagecomparedtostandardventilationinsightsfromaporcinemodel
AT philippconzelmann ultralowtidalvolumeventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationshowsnomitigatingeffectonpulmonaryendorgandamagecomparedtostandardventilationinsightsfromaporcinemodel
AT miriamrenz ultralowtidalvolumeventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationshowsnomitigatingeffectonpulmonaryendorgandamagecomparedtostandardventilationinsightsfromaporcinemodel
AT julianriedel ultralowtidalvolumeventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationshowsnomitigatingeffectonpulmonaryendorgandamagecomparedtostandardventilationinsightsfromaporcinemodel
AT renerissel ultralowtidalvolumeventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationshowsnomitigatingeffectonpulmonaryendorgandamagecomparedtostandardventilationinsightsfromaporcinemodel
AT andreaurmann ultralowtidalvolumeventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationshowsnomitigatingeffectonpulmonaryendorgandamagecomparedtostandardventilationinsightsfromaporcinemodel
AT johannahain ultralowtidalvolumeventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationshowsnomitigatingeffectonpulmonaryendorgandamagecomparedtostandardventilationinsightsfromaporcinemodel
AT bastianduenges ultralowtidalvolumeventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationshowsnomitigatingeffectonpulmonaryendorgandamagecomparedtostandardventilationinsightsfromaporcinemodel
AT alexanderziebart ultralowtidalvolumeventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationshowsnomitigatingeffectonpulmonaryendorgandamagecomparedtostandardventilationinsightsfromaporcinemodel
AT robertruemmler ultralowtidalvolumeventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationshowsnomitigatingeffectonpulmonaryendorgandamagecomparedtostandardventilationinsightsfromaporcinemodel