Re‐evaluation of calcium carbonate (E 170) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groups

Abstract Calcium carbonate (E 170) was re‐evaluated in 2011 by the former EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). As a follow‐up to this assessment, the Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to assess the safety of calcium carbonate (E 170) for it...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF), Maged Younes, Gabriele Aquilina, Laurence Castle, Gisela Degen, Karl‐Heinz Engel, Paul J Fowler, Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez, Peter Fürst, Rainer Gürtler, Trine Husøy, Melania Manco, Wim Mennes, Peter Moldeus, Sabina Passamonti, Romina Shah, Ine Waalkens‐Berendsen, Matthew Wright, Detlef Wölfle, Birgit Dusemund, Alicja Mortensen, Dominique Turck, Karlien Cheyns, Eric Gaffet, Katrin Loeschner, Jan Mast, Manuela Mirat, Anna Undas, Stefania Barmaz, Agnieszka Mech, Ana Maria Rincon, Camilla Smeraldi, Alexandra Tard, Ursula Gundert‐Remy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-07-01
Series:EFSA Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8106
_version_ 1827169506938585088
author EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF)
Maged Younes
Gabriele Aquilina
Laurence Castle
Gisela Degen
Karl‐Heinz Engel
Paul J Fowler
Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez
Peter Fürst
Rainer Gürtler
Trine Husøy
Melania Manco
Wim Mennes
Peter Moldeus
Sabina Passamonti
Romina Shah
Ine Waalkens‐Berendsen
Matthew Wright
Detlef Wölfle
Birgit Dusemund
Alicja Mortensen
Dominique Turck
Karlien Cheyns
Eric Gaffet
Katrin Loeschner
Jan Mast
Manuela Mirat
Anna Undas
Stefania Barmaz
Agnieszka Mech
Ana Maria Rincon
Camilla Smeraldi
Alexandra Tard
Ursula Gundert‐Remy
author_facet EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF)
Maged Younes
Gabriele Aquilina
Laurence Castle
Gisela Degen
Karl‐Heinz Engel
Paul J Fowler
Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez
Peter Fürst
Rainer Gürtler
Trine Husøy
Melania Manco
Wim Mennes
Peter Moldeus
Sabina Passamonti
Romina Shah
Ine Waalkens‐Berendsen
Matthew Wright
Detlef Wölfle
Birgit Dusemund
Alicja Mortensen
Dominique Turck
Karlien Cheyns
Eric Gaffet
Katrin Loeschner
Jan Mast
Manuela Mirat
Anna Undas
Stefania Barmaz
Agnieszka Mech
Ana Maria Rincon
Camilla Smeraldi
Alexandra Tard
Ursula Gundert‐Remy
author_sort EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF)
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Calcium carbonate (E 170) was re‐evaluated in 2011 by the former EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). As a follow‐up to this assessment, the Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to assess the safety of calcium carbonate (E 170) for its uses as a food additive in food for infants below 16 weeks of age belonging to food category 13.1.5.1 (Dietary foods for infants for special medical purposes and special formulae for infants) and as carry over in line with Annex III, Part 5 Section B to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008. In addition, the FAF Panel was requested to address the issues already identified during the re‐evaluation of the food additive when used in food for the general population. The process involved the publication of a call for data to allow the interested business operators (IBOs) to provide the requested information to complete the risk assessment. The Panel concluded that there is no need for a numerical acceptable daily intake (ADI) for calcium carbonate and that, in principle, there are no safety concern with respect to the exposure to calcium carbonate per se at the currently reported uses and use levels in all age groups of the population, including infants below 16 weeks of age. With respect to the calcium intake resulting from the use of E 170 in food for the general population and infants < 16 weeks of age, the Panel concluded that it contributes only to a small part to the overall calcium dietary exposure. However, the unavoidable presence of aluminium in E 170 is of concern and should be addressed. In addition, the Panel concluded that the technical data provided by the IBO support further amendments of the specifications for E 170 laid down in Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T17:36:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-36bd9c7109384dfbbdea89454bc64834
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1831-4732
language English
last_indexed 2025-03-21T02:37:10Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series EFSA Journal
spelling doaj.art-36bd9c7109384dfbbdea89454bc648342024-08-02T11:06:09ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322023-07-01217n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8106Re‐evaluation of calcium carbonate (E 170) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groupsEFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF)Maged YounesGabriele AquilinaLaurence CastleGisela DegenKarl‐Heinz EngelPaul J FowlerMaria Jose Frutos FernandezPeter FürstRainer GürtlerTrine HusøyMelania MancoWim MennesPeter MoldeusSabina PassamontiRomina ShahIne Waalkens‐BerendsenMatthew WrightDetlef WölfleBirgit DusemundAlicja MortensenDominique TurckKarlien CheynsEric GaffetKatrin LoeschnerJan MastManuela MiratAnna UndasStefania BarmazAgnieszka MechAna Maria RinconCamilla SmeraldiAlexandra TardUrsula Gundert‐RemyAbstract Calcium carbonate (E 170) was re‐evaluated in 2011 by the former EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). As a follow‐up to this assessment, the Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to assess the safety of calcium carbonate (E 170) for its uses as a food additive in food for infants below 16 weeks of age belonging to food category 13.1.5.1 (Dietary foods for infants for special medical purposes and special formulae for infants) and as carry over in line with Annex III, Part 5 Section B to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008. In addition, the FAF Panel was requested to address the issues already identified during the re‐evaluation of the food additive when used in food for the general population. The process involved the publication of a call for data to allow the interested business operators (IBOs) to provide the requested information to complete the risk assessment. The Panel concluded that there is no need for a numerical acceptable daily intake (ADI) for calcium carbonate and that, in principle, there are no safety concern with respect to the exposure to calcium carbonate per se at the currently reported uses and use levels in all age groups of the population, including infants below 16 weeks of age. With respect to the calcium intake resulting from the use of E 170 in food for the general population and infants < 16 weeks of age, the Panel concluded that it contributes only to a small part to the overall calcium dietary exposure. However, the unavoidable presence of aluminium in E 170 is of concern and should be addressed. In addition, the Panel concluded that the technical data provided by the IBO support further amendments of the specifications for E 170 laid down in Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8106calcium carbonateE 170food additiveinfants
spellingShingle EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF)
Maged Younes
Gabriele Aquilina
Laurence Castle
Gisela Degen
Karl‐Heinz Engel
Paul J Fowler
Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez
Peter Fürst
Rainer Gürtler
Trine Husøy
Melania Manco
Wim Mennes
Peter Moldeus
Sabina Passamonti
Romina Shah
Ine Waalkens‐Berendsen
Matthew Wright
Detlef Wölfle
Birgit Dusemund
Alicja Mortensen
Dominique Turck
Karlien Cheyns
Eric Gaffet
Katrin Loeschner
Jan Mast
Manuela Mirat
Anna Undas
Stefania Barmaz
Agnieszka Mech
Ana Maria Rincon
Camilla Smeraldi
Alexandra Tard
Ursula Gundert‐Remy
Re‐evaluation of calcium carbonate (E 170) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groups
EFSA Journal
calcium carbonate
E 170
food additive
infants
title Re‐evaluation of calcium carbonate (E 170) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groups
title_full Re‐evaluation of calcium carbonate (E 170) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groups
title_fullStr Re‐evaluation of calcium carbonate (E 170) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groups
title_full_unstemmed Re‐evaluation of calcium carbonate (E 170) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groups
title_short Re‐evaluation of calcium carbonate (E 170) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groups
title_sort re evaluation of calcium carbonate e 170 as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow up of its re evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groups
topic calcium carbonate
E 170
food additive
infants
url https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8106
work_keys_str_mv AT efsapanelonfoodadditivesandflavouringsfaf reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT magedyounes reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT gabrieleaquilina reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT laurencecastle reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT giseladegen reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT karlheinzengel reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT pauljfowler reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT mariajosefrutosfernandez reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT peterfurst reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT rainergurtler reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT trinehusøy reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT melaniamanco reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT wimmennes reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT petermoldeus reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT sabinapassamonti reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT rominashah reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT inewaalkensberendsen reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT matthewwright reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT detlefwolfle reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT birgitdusemund reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT alicjamortensen reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT dominiqueturck reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT karliencheyns reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT ericgaffet reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT katrinloeschner reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT janmast reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT manuelamirat reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT annaundas reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT stefaniabarmaz reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT agnieszkamech reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT anamariarincon reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT camillasmeraldi reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT alexandratard reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT ursulagundertremy reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups