The Pentecostal Movement’s view of the continuity of tongues in Acts and 1 Corinthians

Pentecostals see a continuity between the speaking in languages as a part of the filling or baptism with the Spirit in Acts 2 and the other four incidents in Acts (8, 9, 10, 19). This is also the case of the phenomenon described in 1 Corinthians 12–14, and their own experience, in contradistinction...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marius Nel
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: AOSIS 2017-04-01
Series:In die Skriflig
Subjects:
Online Access:https://indieskriflig.org.za/index.php/skriflig/article/view/2198
_version_ 1811292223655903232
author Marius Nel
author_facet Marius Nel
author_sort Marius Nel
collection DOAJ
description Pentecostals see a continuity between the speaking in languages as a part of the filling or baptism with the Spirit in Acts 2 and the other four incidents in Acts (8, 9, 10, 19). This is also the case of the phenomenon described in 1 Corinthians 12–14, and their own experience, in contradistinction to most Protestants who regard the gift of tongues in terms of Acts 2’s description. It is described as the miraculous ability to speak in real foreign languages with the purpose to reach people from different nationalities with the gospel of Jesus Christ. In this article the pentecostal claim of continuity between the speaking in languages in Acts and Corinthians and our own day is being analysed and criticised. The position poses several questions that need to be addressed, like the seeming and presumed discontinuity between languages in Acts 2 and 1 Corinthians, with the modern pentecostal phenomenon of speaking in languages related to what happened in 1 Corinthians and not in Acts. The implication is that a difference exists between the languages used by the Galileans on the Day of Pentecost and the phenomenon of languages occurring in the Corinthian assembly – with the Corinthian assembly associated with the modern charismatic movement. This poses the question whether a differentiation between speaking in languages in Acts and the phenomenon designated with the same term in 1 Corinthians is sustainable; also whether the identification of modern Pentecostals with the Corinthian phenomenon is allowed.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T04:42:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-36cb21654f0245b2bfd40ebaf9df147a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1018-6441
2305-0853
language Afrikaans
last_indexed 2024-04-13T04:42:10Z
publishDate 2017-04-01
publisher AOSIS
record_format Article
series In die Skriflig
spelling doaj.art-36cb21654f0245b2bfd40ebaf9df147a2022-12-22T03:01:57ZafrAOSISIn die Skriflig1018-64412305-08532017-04-01511e1e710.4102/ids.v51i1.21982132The Pentecostal Movement’s view of the continuity of tongues in Acts and 1 CorinthiansMarius Nel0Faculty of Theology, North-West University, Potchefstroom CampusPentecostals see a continuity between the speaking in languages as a part of the filling or baptism with the Spirit in Acts 2 and the other four incidents in Acts (8, 9, 10, 19). This is also the case of the phenomenon described in 1 Corinthians 12–14, and their own experience, in contradistinction to most Protestants who regard the gift of tongues in terms of Acts 2’s description. It is described as the miraculous ability to speak in real foreign languages with the purpose to reach people from different nationalities with the gospel of Jesus Christ. In this article the pentecostal claim of continuity between the speaking in languages in Acts and Corinthians and our own day is being analysed and criticised. The position poses several questions that need to be addressed, like the seeming and presumed discontinuity between languages in Acts 2 and 1 Corinthians, with the modern pentecostal phenomenon of speaking in languages related to what happened in 1 Corinthians and not in Acts. The implication is that a difference exists between the languages used by the Galileans on the Day of Pentecost and the phenomenon of languages occurring in the Corinthian assembly – with the Corinthian assembly associated with the modern charismatic movement. This poses the question whether a differentiation between speaking in languages in Acts and the phenomenon designated with the same term in 1 Corinthians is sustainable; also whether the identification of modern Pentecostals with the Corinthian phenomenon is allowed.https://indieskriflig.org.za/index.php/skriflig/article/view/2198Speaking in languagesSpirit baptismcontinuitycessasionistcontinuationistActs 21 Corinthians 12-14
spellingShingle Marius Nel
The Pentecostal Movement’s view of the continuity of tongues in Acts and 1 Corinthians
In die Skriflig
Speaking in languages
Spirit baptism
continuity
cessasionist
continuationist
Acts 2
1 Corinthians 12-14
title The Pentecostal Movement’s view of the continuity of tongues in Acts and 1 Corinthians
title_full The Pentecostal Movement’s view of the continuity of tongues in Acts and 1 Corinthians
title_fullStr The Pentecostal Movement’s view of the continuity of tongues in Acts and 1 Corinthians
title_full_unstemmed The Pentecostal Movement’s view of the continuity of tongues in Acts and 1 Corinthians
title_short The Pentecostal Movement’s view of the continuity of tongues in Acts and 1 Corinthians
title_sort pentecostal movement s view of the continuity of tongues in acts and 1 corinthians
topic Speaking in languages
Spirit baptism
continuity
cessasionist
continuationist
Acts 2
1 Corinthians 12-14
url https://indieskriflig.org.za/index.php/skriflig/article/view/2198
work_keys_str_mv AT mariusnel thepentecostalmovementsviewofthecontinuityoftonguesinactsand1corinthians
AT mariusnel pentecostalmovementsviewofthecontinuityoftonguesinactsand1corinthians