Efficacy of inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine in rural India: a 3-year cluster-randomised controlled trial

Summary: Background: Paediatric vaccination against influenza can result in indirect protection, by reducing transmission to their unvaccinated contacts. We investigated whether influenza vaccination of children would protect them and their household members in a resource-limited setting. Methods:...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wayne M Sullender, ProfMD, Karen B Fowler, Prof, Vivek Gupta, MD, Anand Krishnan, Debjani Ram Purakayastha, Raghuram Srungaram VLN, PhD, Kathryn E Lafond, MPH, Siddhartha Saha, MD, Francisco S Palomeque, MPH, Paul Gargiullo, PhD, Seema Jain, MD, Renu Lal, PhD, Marc-Alain Widdowson, VetMB, Shobha Broor, ProfMD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-07-01
Series:The Lancet Global Health
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214109X19300798
_version_ 1818246343290781696
author Wayne M Sullender, ProfMD
Karen B Fowler, Prof
Vivek Gupta, MD
Anand Krishnan
Debjani Ram Purakayastha
Raghuram Srungaram VLN, PhD
Kathryn E Lafond, MPH
Siddhartha Saha, MD
Francisco S Palomeque, MPH
Paul Gargiullo, PhD
Seema Jain, MD
Renu Lal, PhD
Marc-Alain Widdowson, VetMB
Shobha Broor, ProfMD
author_facet Wayne M Sullender, ProfMD
Karen B Fowler, Prof
Vivek Gupta, MD
Anand Krishnan
Debjani Ram Purakayastha
Raghuram Srungaram VLN, PhD
Kathryn E Lafond, MPH
Siddhartha Saha, MD
Francisco S Palomeque, MPH
Paul Gargiullo, PhD
Seema Jain, MD
Renu Lal, PhD
Marc-Alain Widdowson, VetMB
Shobha Broor, ProfMD
author_sort Wayne M Sullender, ProfMD
collection DOAJ
description Summary: Background: Paediatric vaccination against influenza can result in indirect protection, by reducing transmission to their unvaccinated contacts. We investigated whether influenza vaccination of children would protect them and their household members in a resource-limited setting. Methods: We did a cluster-randomised, blinded, controlled study in three villages in India. Clusters were defined as households (ie, dwellings that shared a courtyard), and children aged 6 months to 10 years were eligible for vaccination as and when they became age-eligible throughout the study. Households were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-based system to intramuscular trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3) or a control of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) in the beginning of the study; vaccination occurred once a year for 3 years. The primary efficacy outcome was laboratory-confirmed influenza in a vaccinated child with febrile acute respiratory illness, analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population (ie, children who received at least one dose of vaccine, were under surveillance, and had not an influenza infection within 15 days of last vaccine dose). The secondary outcome for indirect effectiveness (surveillance study) was febrile acute respiratory illness in an unvaccinated household member of a vaccine study participant. Data from each year (year 1: November, 2009, to October, 2010; year 2: October, 2010, to October, 2011; and year 3: October, 2011, to May, 2012) were analysed separately. Safety was analysed among all participants who were vaccinated with at least one dose of the vaccine. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00934245. Findings: Between Nov 1, 2009, to May 1, 2012, we enrolled 3208 households, of which 1959 had vaccine-eligible children. 1010 households were assigned to IIV3 and 949 households were assigned to IPV. In 3 years, we vaccinated 4345 children (2132 with IIV3 and 2213 with IPV) from 1868 households (968 with IIV3 and 900 with IPV) with 10 813 unvaccinated household contacts. In year 1, influenza virus was detected in 151 (10%) of 1572 IIV3 recipients and 206 (13%) of 1633 of IPV recipients (total IIV3 vaccine efficacy 25·6% [95% CI 6·8–40·6]; p=0·010). In year 2, 105 (6%) of 1705 IIV3 recipients and 182 (10%) of 1814 IPV recipients had influenza (vaccine efficacy 41·0% [24·1–54·1]; p<0·0001). In year 3, 20 (1%) of 1670 IIV3 recipients and 81 (5%) of 1786 IPV recipients had influenza (vaccine efficacy 74·2% [57·8–84·3]; p<0·0001). In year 1, total vaccine efficacy against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 was 14·5% (–20·4 to 39·3). In year 2, total vaccine efficacy against influenza A(H3N2) was 64·5% (48·5–75·5). Total vaccine efficacy against influenza B was 32·5% (11·3–48·6) in year 1, 4·9% (–38·9 to 34·9) in year 2, and 76·5% (59·4–86·4) in year 3. Indirect vaccine effectiveness was statistically significant only in year 3 (38·1% [7·4–58·6], p=0·0197) when influenza was detected in 39 (1%) of 4323 IIV3-allocated and 60 (1%) of 4121 IPV-allocated household unvaccinated individuals. In the IIV3 group, 225 (12%) of 1632 children in year 1, 375 (22%) of 1718 in year 2, and 209 (12%) of 1673 in year 3 had an adverse reaction (compared with 216 [13%] of 1730, 380 [21%] of 1825, and 235 [13%] of 1796, respectively, in the IPV group). The most common reactions in both groups were fever and tenderness at site. No vaccine-related deaths occurred in either group. Interpretation: IIV3 provided variable direct and indirect protection against influenza infection. Indirect protection was significant during the year of highest direct protection and should be considered when quantifying the effect of vaccination programmes. Funding: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T14:47:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-36db867c42304d5490b4847f09075316
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2214-109X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T14:47:18Z
publishDate 2019-07-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series The Lancet Global Health
spelling doaj.art-36db867c42304d5490b4847f090753162022-12-22T00:21:06ZengElsevierThe Lancet Global Health2214-109X2019-07-0177e940e950Efficacy of inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine in rural India: a 3-year cluster-randomised controlled trialWayne M Sullender, ProfMD0Karen B Fowler, Prof1Vivek Gupta, MD2Anand Krishnan3Debjani Ram Purakayastha4Raghuram Srungaram VLN, PhD5Kathryn E Lafond, MPH6Siddhartha Saha, MD7Francisco S Palomeque, MPH8Paul Gargiullo, PhD9Seema Jain, MD10Renu Lal, PhD11Marc-Alain Widdowson, VetMB12Shobha Broor, ProfMD13Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, and Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA; Correspondence to: Prof Wayne M Sullender, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora 13199, CO, USADepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USACommunity Ophthalmology Department, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, IndiaCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, IndiaCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, IndiaMicrobiology Department, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, IndiaInfluenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USAInfluenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USAInfluenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USAInfluenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USAInfluenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USAInfluenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USAInfluenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USAMicrobiology Department, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, IndiaSummary: Background: Paediatric vaccination against influenza can result in indirect protection, by reducing transmission to their unvaccinated contacts. We investigated whether influenza vaccination of children would protect them and their household members in a resource-limited setting. Methods: We did a cluster-randomised, blinded, controlled study in three villages in India. Clusters were defined as households (ie, dwellings that shared a courtyard), and children aged 6 months to 10 years were eligible for vaccination as and when they became age-eligible throughout the study. Households were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-based system to intramuscular trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3) or a control of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) in the beginning of the study; vaccination occurred once a year for 3 years. The primary efficacy outcome was laboratory-confirmed influenza in a vaccinated child with febrile acute respiratory illness, analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population (ie, children who received at least one dose of vaccine, were under surveillance, and had not an influenza infection within 15 days of last vaccine dose). The secondary outcome for indirect effectiveness (surveillance study) was febrile acute respiratory illness in an unvaccinated household member of a vaccine study participant. Data from each year (year 1: November, 2009, to October, 2010; year 2: October, 2010, to October, 2011; and year 3: October, 2011, to May, 2012) were analysed separately. Safety was analysed among all participants who were vaccinated with at least one dose of the vaccine. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00934245. Findings: Between Nov 1, 2009, to May 1, 2012, we enrolled 3208 households, of which 1959 had vaccine-eligible children. 1010 households were assigned to IIV3 and 949 households were assigned to IPV. In 3 years, we vaccinated 4345 children (2132 with IIV3 and 2213 with IPV) from 1868 households (968 with IIV3 and 900 with IPV) with 10 813 unvaccinated household contacts. In year 1, influenza virus was detected in 151 (10%) of 1572 IIV3 recipients and 206 (13%) of 1633 of IPV recipients (total IIV3 vaccine efficacy 25·6% [95% CI 6·8–40·6]; p=0·010). In year 2, 105 (6%) of 1705 IIV3 recipients and 182 (10%) of 1814 IPV recipients had influenza (vaccine efficacy 41·0% [24·1–54·1]; p<0·0001). In year 3, 20 (1%) of 1670 IIV3 recipients and 81 (5%) of 1786 IPV recipients had influenza (vaccine efficacy 74·2% [57·8–84·3]; p<0·0001). In year 1, total vaccine efficacy against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 was 14·5% (–20·4 to 39·3). In year 2, total vaccine efficacy against influenza A(H3N2) was 64·5% (48·5–75·5). Total vaccine efficacy against influenza B was 32·5% (11·3–48·6) in year 1, 4·9% (–38·9 to 34·9) in year 2, and 76·5% (59·4–86·4) in year 3. Indirect vaccine effectiveness was statistically significant only in year 3 (38·1% [7·4–58·6], p=0·0197) when influenza was detected in 39 (1%) of 4323 IIV3-allocated and 60 (1%) of 4121 IPV-allocated household unvaccinated individuals. In the IIV3 group, 225 (12%) of 1632 children in year 1, 375 (22%) of 1718 in year 2, and 209 (12%) of 1673 in year 3 had an adverse reaction (compared with 216 [13%] of 1730, 380 [21%] of 1825, and 235 [13%] of 1796, respectively, in the IPV group). The most common reactions in both groups were fever and tenderness at site. No vaccine-related deaths occurred in either group. Interpretation: IIV3 provided variable direct and indirect protection against influenza infection. Indirect protection was significant during the year of highest direct protection and should be considered when quantifying the effect of vaccination programmes. Funding: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214109X19300798
spellingShingle Wayne M Sullender, ProfMD
Karen B Fowler, Prof
Vivek Gupta, MD
Anand Krishnan
Debjani Ram Purakayastha
Raghuram Srungaram VLN, PhD
Kathryn E Lafond, MPH
Siddhartha Saha, MD
Francisco S Palomeque, MPH
Paul Gargiullo, PhD
Seema Jain, MD
Renu Lal, PhD
Marc-Alain Widdowson, VetMB
Shobha Broor, ProfMD
Efficacy of inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine in rural India: a 3-year cluster-randomised controlled trial
The Lancet Global Health
title Efficacy of inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine in rural India: a 3-year cluster-randomised controlled trial
title_full Efficacy of inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine in rural India: a 3-year cluster-randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine in rural India: a 3-year cluster-randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine in rural India: a 3-year cluster-randomised controlled trial
title_short Efficacy of inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine in rural India: a 3-year cluster-randomised controlled trial
title_sort efficacy of inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine in rural india a 3 year cluster randomised controlled trial
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214109X19300798
work_keys_str_mv AT waynemsullenderprofmd efficacyofinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccineinruralindiaa3yearclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT karenbfowlerprof efficacyofinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccineinruralindiaa3yearclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vivekguptamd efficacyofinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccineinruralindiaa3yearclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT anandkrishnan efficacyofinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccineinruralindiaa3yearclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT debjanirampurakayastha efficacyofinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccineinruralindiaa3yearclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT raghuramsrungaramvlnphd efficacyofinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccineinruralindiaa3yearclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kathrynelafondmph efficacyofinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccineinruralindiaa3yearclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT siddharthasahamd efficacyofinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccineinruralindiaa3yearclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT franciscospalomequemph efficacyofinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccineinruralindiaa3yearclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT paulgargiullophd efficacyofinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccineinruralindiaa3yearclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT seemajainmd efficacyofinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccineinruralindiaa3yearclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT renulalphd efficacyofinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccineinruralindiaa3yearclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT marcalainwiddowsonvetmb efficacyofinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccineinruralindiaa3yearclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT shobhabroorprofmd efficacyofinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccineinruralindiaa3yearclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial