Does International Law Regulate Relations with Participation of Individuals? (Part I)
The оccurrence and the futility of the scientific debate on the most debated in the scientificliterature of the fundamental problems of the General theory of international law related to same – lack of resolution of complex theoretical problems, which can be called the main problem of the theory of...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO)
2017-12-01
|
| Series: | Московский журнал международного права |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mjil.ru/jour/article/view/162 |
| _version_ | 1797291477482602496 |
|---|---|
| author | B. I. Nefedov |
| author_facet | B. I. Nefedov |
| author_sort | B. I. Nefedov |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The оccurrence and the futility of the scientific debate on the most debated in the scientificliterature of the fundamental problems of the General theory of international law related to same – lack of resolution of complex theoretical problems, which can be called the main problem of the theory of international law over the past century and a half. It is based on seemingly irreconcilable differences. So, on the one hand, international legal norms can (under certain conditions) regulate relations with participation of individuals but, on the other hand, individuals are subjects of international law and relations involving them are not international intergovernmental relations, i.e. subject to international law. In the first part the article provides a criticism of the main directions taken in science attempts to solve this problem: theories of transformation; concepts recognition relationships with participation of individuals regulated by norms of international law, international relations; concepts of international legal personality of individuals; claims that Private international law does not have its own content, and represents only teaching and/or scientific term. In the result it is concluded that none of these concepts does not solve the basic problem of the General theory of international law. In the second part of the article offers the solution. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T19:37:26Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-36e66f0ec8144aa2931fce5aa5a48ac0 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0869-0049 2619-0893 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T19:37:26Z |
| publishDate | 2017-12-01 |
| publisher | Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Московский журнал международного права |
| spelling | doaj.art-36e66f0ec8144aa2931fce5aa5a48ac02024-02-29T08:19:19ZengMoscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO)Московский журнал международного права0869-00492619-08932017-12-010131910.24833/0869-0049-2017-1-3-19162Does International Law Regulate Relations with Participation of Individuals? (Part I)B. I. Nefedov0MGIMO-University MFA RussiaThe оccurrence and the futility of the scientific debate on the most debated in the scientificliterature of the fundamental problems of the General theory of international law related to same – lack of resolution of complex theoretical problems, which can be called the main problem of the theory of international law over the past century and a half. It is based on seemingly irreconcilable differences. So, on the one hand, international legal norms can (under certain conditions) regulate relations with participation of individuals but, on the other hand, individuals are subjects of international law and relations involving them are not international intergovernmental relations, i.e. subject to international law. In the first part the article provides a criticism of the main directions taken in science attempts to solve this problem: theories of transformation; concepts recognition relationships with participation of individuals regulated by norms of international law, international relations; concepts of international legal personality of individuals; claims that Private international law does not have its own content, and represents only teaching and/or scientific term. In the result it is concluded that none of these concepts does not solve the basic problem of the General theory of international law. In the second part of the article offers the solution.https://www.mjil.ru/jour/article/view/162theory of transformationthe international personality of individuals in international relationssubject and object of an international treaty |
| spellingShingle | B. I. Nefedov Does International Law Regulate Relations with Participation of Individuals? (Part I) Московский журнал международного права theory of transformation the international personality of individuals in international relations subject and object of an international treaty |
| title | Does International Law Regulate Relations with Participation of Individuals? (Part I) |
| title_full | Does International Law Regulate Relations with Participation of Individuals? (Part I) |
| title_fullStr | Does International Law Regulate Relations with Participation of Individuals? (Part I) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Does International Law Regulate Relations with Participation of Individuals? (Part I) |
| title_short | Does International Law Regulate Relations with Participation of Individuals? (Part I) |
| title_sort | does international law regulate relations with participation of individuals part i |
| topic | theory of transformation the international personality of individuals in international relations subject and object of an international treaty |
| url | https://www.mjil.ru/jour/article/view/162 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT binefedov doesinternationallawregulaterelationswithparticipationofindividualsparti |