Investigation of Water Injection Influence on Cloud Cavitating Vortical Flow for a NACA66 (MOD) Hydrofoil

Re-entrant jet causes cloud cavitation shedding, and cavitating vortical flow results in flow field instability. In the present work, a method of water injection is proposed to hinder re-entrant jet and suppress vortex in cloud cavitating flow of a NACA66 (MOD) hydrofoil (Re = 5.1 × 10<sup>5&l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhijian Li, Wei Wang, Xiang Ji, Xiaofang Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-09-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/18/5973
_version_ 1797519408468328448
author Zhijian Li
Wei Wang
Xiang Ji
Xiaofang Wang
author_facet Zhijian Li
Wei Wang
Xiang Ji
Xiaofang Wang
author_sort Zhijian Li
collection DOAJ
description Re-entrant jet causes cloud cavitation shedding, and cavitating vortical flow results in flow field instability. In the present work, a method of water injection is proposed to hinder re-entrant jet and suppress vortex in cloud cavitating flow of a NACA66 (MOD) hydrofoil (Re = 5.1 × 10<sup>5</sup>, <i>σ</i> = 0.83). A combination of filter-based density corrected turbulence model (FBDCM) with the Zwart–Gerber–Belamri cavitation model (ZGB) is adopted to obtain the transient flow characteristics while vortex structures are identified by <i>Q</i> criterion & <i>λ</i><sub>2</sub> criterion. Results demonstrate that the injected water flow reduces the range of the low-pressure zone below 1940 Pa on the suction surface by 54.76%. Vortex structures are observed both inside the attached and shedding cavitation, and the water injection shrinks the vortex region. The water injection successfully blocks the re-entrant jet by generating a favorable pressure gradient (FPG) and effectively weakens the re-entrant jet intensity by 46.98%. The water injection shrinks the vortex distribution area near the hydrofoil suction surface, which makes the flow in the boundary layer more stable. From an energy transfer perspective, the water injection supplies energy to the near-wall flow, and hence keeps the steadiness of the flow field.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T07:42:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-36ef60ffd8044abcad43275330412597
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T07:42:22Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-36ef60ffd8044abcad432753304125972023-11-22T12:55:53ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732021-09-011418597310.3390/en14185973Investigation of Water Injection Influence on Cloud Cavitating Vortical Flow for a NACA66 (MOD) HydrofoilZhijian Li0Wei Wang1Xiang Ji2Xiaofang Wang3School of Energy and Power Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, ChinaSchool of Energy and Power Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, ChinaSchool of Energy and Power Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, ChinaSchool of Energy and Power Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, ChinaRe-entrant jet causes cloud cavitation shedding, and cavitating vortical flow results in flow field instability. In the present work, a method of water injection is proposed to hinder re-entrant jet and suppress vortex in cloud cavitating flow of a NACA66 (MOD) hydrofoil (Re = 5.1 × 10<sup>5</sup>, <i>σ</i> = 0.83). A combination of filter-based density corrected turbulence model (FBDCM) with the Zwart–Gerber–Belamri cavitation model (ZGB) is adopted to obtain the transient flow characteristics while vortex structures are identified by <i>Q</i> criterion & <i>λ</i><sub>2</sub> criterion. Results demonstrate that the injected water flow reduces the range of the low-pressure zone below 1940 Pa on the suction surface by 54.76%. Vortex structures are observed both inside the attached and shedding cavitation, and the water injection shrinks the vortex region. The water injection successfully blocks the re-entrant jet by generating a favorable pressure gradient (FPG) and effectively weakens the re-entrant jet intensity by 46.98%. The water injection shrinks the vortex distribution area near the hydrofoil suction surface, which makes the flow in the boundary layer more stable. From an energy transfer perspective, the water injection supplies energy to the near-wall flow, and hence keeps the steadiness of the flow field.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/18/5973cloud cavitationvortical flowwater injectionre-entrant jetflow control
spellingShingle Zhijian Li
Wei Wang
Xiang Ji
Xiaofang Wang
Investigation of Water Injection Influence on Cloud Cavitating Vortical Flow for a NACA66 (MOD) Hydrofoil
Energies
cloud cavitation
vortical flow
water injection
re-entrant jet
flow control
title Investigation of Water Injection Influence on Cloud Cavitating Vortical Flow for a NACA66 (MOD) Hydrofoil
title_full Investigation of Water Injection Influence on Cloud Cavitating Vortical Flow for a NACA66 (MOD) Hydrofoil
title_fullStr Investigation of Water Injection Influence on Cloud Cavitating Vortical Flow for a NACA66 (MOD) Hydrofoil
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of Water Injection Influence on Cloud Cavitating Vortical Flow for a NACA66 (MOD) Hydrofoil
title_short Investigation of Water Injection Influence on Cloud Cavitating Vortical Flow for a NACA66 (MOD) Hydrofoil
title_sort investigation of water injection influence on cloud cavitating vortical flow for a naca66 mod hydrofoil
topic cloud cavitation
vortical flow
water injection
re-entrant jet
flow control
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/18/5973
work_keys_str_mv AT zhijianli investigationofwaterinjectioninfluenceoncloudcavitatingvorticalflowforanaca66modhydrofoil
AT weiwang investigationofwaterinjectioninfluenceoncloudcavitatingvorticalflowforanaca66modhydrofoil
AT xiangji investigationofwaterinjectioninfluenceoncloudcavitatingvorticalflowforanaca66modhydrofoil
AT xiaofangwang investigationofwaterinjectioninfluenceoncloudcavitatingvorticalflowforanaca66modhydrofoil