PRECEDENCE AS A PSYCHOLINGUISTIC CATEGORY
The use of particular linguistic units by representatives of a linguacultural community as the most preferable verbal actions is not necessary to be a case of verbal operations with some culturally specific knowledge. The analysis of a psychosocial mechanism used for generation and verbalization of...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Volgograd State University
2015-06-01
|
| Series: | Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 2. Âzykoznanie |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2015.2.18 |
| _version_ | 1818945155185508352 |
|---|---|
| author | Panarina Nadezhda Sergeevna |
| author_facet | Panarina Nadezhda Sergeevna |
| author_sort | Panarina Nadezhda Sergeevna |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The use of particular linguistic units by representatives of a linguacultural community as the most preferable verbal actions is not necessary to be a case of verbal operations with some culturally specific knowledge. The analysis of a psychosocial mechanism used for generation and verbalization of such a knowledge allows to define the nature of precedence as a characteristic of meaning that is being effected in a speech act. The development of precedent meaning indispensably assumes not only generation of the definition component, but also entry into a structure of a culturological component meaning. The culturological component reflects a relationship between a subject-concept component of the meaning and the other elements of a speech situation – the relationship, which is notional for a person. Importance of the relationship consists in fact that definition of its content represents to a person their social identity. Until a person understands the content of relationship, which is represented by the culturological component, the use of corresponding linguistic units to nominate new objects of reality is a supraliminal appeal to the precedent knowledge, a speech act. But for new acts of usage the main thing is definitely quality of relationship as a characteristic of the cultural group stability, and the linguistic unit usage derives a new function. When the culturological component of the meaning is not included into generalization, since it is irrelevant one, and the core of meaning is composed of new and more relevant for the usage features, you can no more realize the inner form of the precedent meaning. The outer form is still relevant, since it is kept in mind by the representatives of linguaculture as the one which is preferable for usage. In this case the linguistic unit is just a tool not related to verbal representation of socially significant attitude, and its usage is a speech operation, a way to perform different speech acts. In summary, any speech act assumes particular correlation and content of meaning components. Presence of culturological component in meaning structure represents specific nature of speech activity structural elements. Therefore, precedence is a psycholinguistic category, which must be considered taking into account structural features of a particular speech activity. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-20T07:54:37Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-36f278ad53344731bf0f2ef79ff3566d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1998-9911 2409-1979 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-20T07:54:37Z |
| publishDate | 2015-06-01 |
| publisher | Volgograd State University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 2. Âzykoznanie |
| spelling | doaj.art-36f278ad53344731bf0f2ef79ff3566d2022-12-21T19:47:44ZengVolgograd State UniversityVestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 2. Âzykoznanie1998-99112409-19792015-06-0126212813510.15688/jvolsu2.2015.2.18PRECEDENCE AS A PSYCHOLINGUISTIC CATEGORYPanarina Nadezhda SergeevnaThe use of particular linguistic units by representatives of a linguacultural community as the most preferable verbal actions is not necessary to be a case of verbal operations with some culturally specific knowledge. The analysis of a psychosocial mechanism used for generation and verbalization of such a knowledge allows to define the nature of precedence as a characteristic of meaning that is being effected in a speech act. The development of precedent meaning indispensably assumes not only generation of the definition component, but also entry into a structure of a culturological component meaning. The culturological component reflects a relationship between a subject-concept component of the meaning and the other elements of a speech situation – the relationship, which is notional for a person. Importance of the relationship consists in fact that definition of its content represents to a person their social identity. Until a person understands the content of relationship, which is represented by the culturological component, the use of corresponding linguistic units to nominate new objects of reality is a supraliminal appeal to the precedent knowledge, a speech act. But for new acts of usage the main thing is definitely quality of relationship as a characteristic of the cultural group stability, and the linguistic unit usage derives a new function. When the culturological component of the meaning is not included into generalization, since it is irrelevant one, and the core of meaning is composed of new and more relevant for the usage features, you can no more realize the inner form of the precedent meaning. The outer form is still relevant, since it is kept in mind by the representatives of linguaculture as the one which is preferable for usage. In this case the linguistic unit is just a tool not related to verbal representation of socially significant attitude, and its usage is a speech operation, a way to perform different speech acts. In summary, any speech act assumes particular correlation and content of meaning components. Presence of culturological component in meaning structure represents specific nature of speech activity structural elements. Therefore, precedence is a psycholinguistic category, which must be considered taking into account structural features of a particular speech activity.http://dx.doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2015.2.18linguaculturespeech activitysocial identitylinguistic meaningsecondary nominationprecedenceprecedent text |
| spellingShingle | Panarina Nadezhda Sergeevna PRECEDENCE AS A PSYCHOLINGUISTIC CATEGORY Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 2. Âzykoznanie linguaculture speech activity social identity linguistic meaning secondary nomination precedence precedent text |
| title | PRECEDENCE AS A PSYCHOLINGUISTIC CATEGORY |
| title_full | PRECEDENCE AS A PSYCHOLINGUISTIC CATEGORY |
| title_fullStr | PRECEDENCE AS A PSYCHOLINGUISTIC CATEGORY |
| title_full_unstemmed | PRECEDENCE AS A PSYCHOLINGUISTIC CATEGORY |
| title_short | PRECEDENCE AS A PSYCHOLINGUISTIC CATEGORY |
| title_sort | precedence as a psycholinguistic category |
| topic | linguaculture speech activity social identity linguistic meaning secondary nomination precedence precedent text |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2015.2.18 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT panarinanadezhdasergeevna precedenceasapsycholinguisticcategory |