Outcomes of Revision Surgery Following Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Comparative Analysis between Pseudarthrosis and Adjacent Segment Disease

Study DesignRetrospective study.PurposeWe examined the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients who received revision surgery for pseudarthrosis or adjacent segment disease (ASD) following decompression and instrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF).Overview of LiteratureAt present, information...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seung-Pyo Suh, Young-Hoon Jo, Hae Won Jeong, Won Rak Choi, Chang-Nam Kang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Spine Society 2017-06-01
Series:Asian Spine Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-11-463.pdf
_version_ 1811330827721637888
author Seung-Pyo Suh
Young-Hoon Jo
Hae Won Jeong
Won Rak Choi
Chang-Nam Kang
author_facet Seung-Pyo Suh
Young-Hoon Jo
Hae Won Jeong
Won Rak Choi
Chang-Nam Kang
author_sort Seung-Pyo Suh
collection DOAJ
description Study DesignRetrospective study.PurposeWe examined the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients who received revision surgery for pseudarthrosis or adjacent segment disease (ASD) following decompression and instrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF).Overview of LiteratureAt present, information regarding the outcomes of revision surgery for complications such as pseudarthrosis and ASD following instrumented PLF is limited.MethodsThis study examined 60 patients who received PLF for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis and subsequently developed pseudarthrosis or ASD leading to revision surgery. Subjects were divided into a group of 21 patients who received revision surgery for pseudarthrosis (Group P) and a group of 39 patients who received revision surgery for ASD (Group A). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analogue scales for back pain (VAS-BP) and leg pain (VAS-LP), the Korean Oswestry disability index (K-ODI), and each patient's subjective satisfaction. Radiological outcomes were evaluated from the extent of bone union, and complications in the two groups were compared.ResultsVAS-LP at final follow-up was not statistically different between the two groups (p =0.353), although VAS-BP and K-ODI at final follow-up were significantly worse in Group P than in Group A (all p <0.05), and only 52% of the patients in Group P felt that their overall well-being had improved following revision surgery. Fusion rates after the first revision surgery were 71% (15/21) in Group P and 95% (37/39) in Group A (p =0.018). The rate of reoperation was significantly higher in Group P (29%) than in Group A (5%) (p =0.021) due to complications.ConclusionsClinical and radiological outcomes were worse in patients who had received revision surgery for pseudarthrosis than in those who had revision surgery for ASD. Elderly patients should be carefully advised of the risks and benefits before planning revision surgery for pseudarthrosis.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T16:09:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3707a720865b4e2a8043f1ca54500fbf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1976-1902
1976-7846
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T16:09:48Z
publishDate 2017-06-01
publisher Korean Spine Society
record_format Article
series Asian Spine Journal
spelling doaj.art-3707a720865b4e2a8043f1ca54500fbf2022-12-22T02:40:17ZengKorean Spine SocietyAsian Spine Journal1976-19021976-78462017-06-0111346347110.4184/asj.2017.11.3.463240Outcomes of Revision Surgery Following Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Comparative Analysis between Pseudarthrosis and Adjacent Segment DiseaseSeung-Pyo Suh0Young-Hoon Jo1Hae Won Jeong2Won Rak Choi3Chang-Nam Kang4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sung-Ae Hospital, Seoul, Korea.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Study DesignRetrospective study.PurposeWe examined the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients who received revision surgery for pseudarthrosis or adjacent segment disease (ASD) following decompression and instrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF).Overview of LiteratureAt present, information regarding the outcomes of revision surgery for complications such as pseudarthrosis and ASD following instrumented PLF is limited.MethodsThis study examined 60 patients who received PLF for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis and subsequently developed pseudarthrosis or ASD leading to revision surgery. Subjects were divided into a group of 21 patients who received revision surgery for pseudarthrosis (Group P) and a group of 39 patients who received revision surgery for ASD (Group A). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analogue scales for back pain (VAS-BP) and leg pain (VAS-LP), the Korean Oswestry disability index (K-ODI), and each patient's subjective satisfaction. Radiological outcomes were evaluated from the extent of bone union, and complications in the two groups were compared.ResultsVAS-LP at final follow-up was not statistically different between the two groups (p =0.353), although VAS-BP and K-ODI at final follow-up were significantly worse in Group P than in Group A (all p <0.05), and only 52% of the patients in Group P felt that their overall well-being had improved following revision surgery. Fusion rates after the first revision surgery were 71% (15/21) in Group P and 95% (37/39) in Group A (p =0.018). The rate of reoperation was significantly higher in Group P (29%) than in Group A (5%) (p =0.021) due to complications.ConclusionsClinical and radiological outcomes were worse in patients who had received revision surgery for pseudarthrosis than in those who had revision surgery for ASD. Elderly patients should be carefully advised of the risks and benefits before planning revision surgery for pseudarthrosis.http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-11-463.pdfInstrumented posterolateral fusionRevision surgeryPseudarthrosisAdjacent segment diseaseOutcome
spellingShingle Seung-Pyo Suh
Young-Hoon Jo
Hae Won Jeong
Won Rak Choi
Chang-Nam Kang
Outcomes of Revision Surgery Following Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Comparative Analysis between Pseudarthrosis and Adjacent Segment Disease
Asian Spine Journal
Instrumented posterolateral fusion
Revision surgery
Pseudarthrosis
Adjacent segment disease
Outcome
title Outcomes of Revision Surgery Following Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Comparative Analysis between Pseudarthrosis and Adjacent Segment Disease
title_full Outcomes of Revision Surgery Following Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Comparative Analysis between Pseudarthrosis and Adjacent Segment Disease
title_fullStr Outcomes of Revision Surgery Following Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Comparative Analysis between Pseudarthrosis and Adjacent Segment Disease
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of Revision Surgery Following Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Comparative Analysis between Pseudarthrosis and Adjacent Segment Disease
title_short Outcomes of Revision Surgery Following Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Comparative Analysis between Pseudarthrosis and Adjacent Segment Disease
title_sort outcomes of revision surgery following instrumented posterolateral fusion in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis a comparative analysis between pseudarthrosis and adjacent segment disease
topic Instrumented posterolateral fusion
Revision surgery
Pseudarthrosis
Adjacent segment disease
Outcome
url http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-11-463.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT seungpyosuh outcomesofrevisionsurgeryfollowinginstrumentedposterolateralfusionindegenerativelumbarspinalstenosisacomparativeanalysisbetweenpseudarthrosisandadjacentsegmentdisease
AT younghoonjo outcomesofrevisionsurgeryfollowinginstrumentedposterolateralfusionindegenerativelumbarspinalstenosisacomparativeanalysisbetweenpseudarthrosisandadjacentsegmentdisease
AT haewonjeong outcomesofrevisionsurgeryfollowinginstrumentedposterolateralfusionindegenerativelumbarspinalstenosisacomparativeanalysisbetweenpseudarthrosisandadjacentsegmentdisease
AT wonrakchoi outcomesofrevisionsurgeryfollowinginstrumentedposterolateralfusionindegenerativelumbarspinalstenosisacomparativeanalysisbetweenpseudarthrosisandadjacentsegmentdisease
AT changnamkang outcomesofrevisionsurgeryfollowinginstrumentedposterolateralfusionindegenerativelumbarspinalstenosisacomparativeanalysisbetweenpseudarthrosisandadjacentsegmentdisease