Exploring uncertainty in glacier mass balance modelling with Monte Carlo simulation
By means of Monte Carlo simulations we calculated uncertainty in modelled cumulative mass balance over 400 days at one particular point on the tongue of Morteratsch Glacier, Switzerland, using a glacier energy balance model of intermediate complexity. Before uncertainty assessment, the model was tun...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2008-12-01
|
Series: | The Cryosphere |
Online Access: | http://www.the-cryosphere.net/2/191/2008/tc-2-191-2008.pdf |
_version_ | 1818232904090648576 |
---|---|
author | H. Machguth R. S. Purves J. Oerlemans M. Hoelzle F. Paul |
author_facet | H. Machguth R. S. Purves J. Oerlemans M. Hoelzle F. Paul |
author_sort | H. Machguth |
collection | DOAJ |
description | By means of Monte Carlo simulations we calculated uncertainty in modelled cumulative mass balance over 400 days at one particular point on the tongue of Morteratsch Glacier, Switzerland, using a glacier energy balance model of intermediate complexity. Before uncertainty assessment, the model was tuned to observed mass balance for the investigated time period and its robustness was tested by comparing observed and modelled mass balance over 11 years, yielding very small deviations. Both systematic and random uncertainties are assigned to twelve input parameters and their respective values estimated from the literature or from available meteorological data sets. The calculated overall uncertainty in the model output is dominated by systematic errors and amounts to 0.7 m w.e. or approximately 10% of total melt over the investigated time span. In order to provide a first order estimate on variability in uncertainty depending on the quality of input data, we conducted a further experiment, calculating overall uncertainty for different levels of uncertainty in measured global radiation and air temperature. Our results show that the output of a well calibrated model is subject to considerable uncertainties, in particular when applied for extrapolation in time and space where systematic errors are likely to be an important issue. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-12T11:13:41Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-370e75b4ec534e9aae5602f0a7f9ef09 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1994-0416 1994-0424 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-12T11:13:41Z |
publishDate | 2008-12-01 |
publisher | Copernicus Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | The Cryosphere |
spelling | doaj.art-370e75b4ec534e9aae5602f0a7f9ef092022-12-22T00:26:13ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe Cryosphere1994-04161994-04242008-12-0122191204Exploring uncertainty in glacier mass balance modelling with Monte Carlo simulationH. MachguthR. S. PurvesJ. OerlemansM. HoelzleF. PaulBy means of Monte Carlo simulations we calculated uncertainty in modelled cumulative mass balance over 400 days at one particular point on the tongue of Morteratsch Glacier, Switzerland, using a glacier energy balance model of intermediate complexity. Before uncertainty assessment, the model was tuned to observed mass balance for the investigated time period and its robustness was tested by comparing observed and modelled mass balance over 11 years, yielding very small deviations. Both systematic and random uncertainties are assigned to twelve input parameters and their respective values estimated from the literature or from available meteorological data sets. The calculated overall uncertainty in the model output is dominated by systematic errors and amounts to 0.7 m w.e. or approximately 10% of total melt over the investigated time span. In order to provide a first order estimate on variability in uncertainty depending on the quality of input data, we conducted a further experiment, calculating overall uncertainty for different levels of uncertainty in measured global radiation and air temperature. Our results show that the output of a well calibrated model is subject to considerable uncertainties, in particular when applied for extrapolation in time and space where systematic errors are likely to be an important issue.http://www.the-cryosphere.net/2/191/2008/tc-2-191-2008.pdf |
spellingShingle | H. Machguth R. S. Purves J. Oerlemans M. Hoelzle F. Paul Exploring uncertainty in glacier mass balance modelling with Monte Carlo simulation The Cryosphere |
title | Exploring uncertainty in glacier mass balance modelling with Monte Carlo simulation |
title_full | Exploring uncertainty in glacier mass balance modelling with Monte Carlo simulation |
title_fullStr | Exploring uncertainty in glacier mass balance modelling with Monte Carlo simulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring uncertainty in glacier mass balance modelling with Monte Carlo simulation |
title_short | Exploring uncertainty in glacier mass balance modelling with Monte Carlo simulation |
title_sort | exploring uncertainty in glacier mass balance modelling with monte carlo simulation |
url | http://www.the-cryosphere.net/2/191/2008/tc-2-191-2008.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hmachguth exploringuncertaintyinglaciermassbalancemodellingwithmontecarlosimulation AT rspurves exploringuncertaintyinglaciermassbalancemodellingwithmontecarlosimulation AT joerlemans exploringuncertaintyinglaciermassbalancemodellingwithmontecarlosimulation AT mhoelzle exploringuncertaintyinglaciermassbalancemodellingwithmontecarlosimulation AT fpaul exploringuncertaintyinglaciermassbalancemodellingwithmontecarlosimulation |