Exploring uncertainty in glacier mass balance modelling with Monte Carlo simulation

By means of Monte Carlo simulations we calculated uncertainty in modelled cumulative mass balance over 400 days at one particular point on the tongue of Morteratsch Glacier, Switzerland, using a glacier energy balance model of intermediate complexity. Before uncertainty assessment, the model was tun...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H. Machguth, R. S. Purves, J. Oerlemans, M. Hoelzle, F. Paul
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2008-12-01
Series:The Cryosphere
Online Access:http://www.the-cryosphere.net/2/191/2008/tc-2-191-2008.pdf
_version_ 1818232904090648576
author H. Machguth
R. S. Purves
J. Oerlemans
M. Hoelzle
F. Paul
author_facet H. Machguth
R. S. Purves
J. Oerlemans
M. Hoelzle
F. Paul
author_sort H. Machguth
collection DOAJ
description By means of Monte Carlo simulations we calculated uncertainty in modelled cumulative mass balance over 400 days at one particular point on the tongue of Morteratsch Glacier, Switzerland, using a glacier energy balance model of intermediate complexity. Before uncertainty assessment, the model was tuned to observed mass balance for the investigated time period and its robustness was tested by comparing observed and modelled mass balance over 11 years, yielding very small deviations. Both systematic and random uncertainties are assigned to twelve input parameters and their respective values estimated from the literature or from available meteorological data sets. The calculated overall uncertainty in the model output is dominated by systematic errors and amounts to 0.7 m w.e. or approximately 10% of total melt over the investigated time span. In order to provide a first order estimate on variability in uncertainty depending on the quality of input data, we conducted a further experiment, calculating overall uncertainty for different levels of uncertainty in measured global radiation and air temperature. Our results show that the output of a well calibrated model is subject to considerable uncertainties, in particular when applied for extrapolation in time and space where systematic errors are likely to be an important issue.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T11:13:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-370e75b4ec534e9aae5602f0a7f9ef09
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1994-0416
1994-0424
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T11:13:41Z
publishDate 2008-12-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series The Cryosphere
spelling doaj.art-370e75b4ec534e9aae5602f0a7f9ef092022-12-22T00:26:13ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe Cryosphere1994-04161994-04242008-12-0122191204Exploring uncertainty in glacier mass balance modelling with Monte Carlo simulationH. MachguthR. S. PurvesJ. OerlemansM. HoelzleF. PaulBy means of Monte Carlo simulations we calculated uncertainty in modelled cumulative mass balance over 400 days at one particular point on the tongue of Morteratsch Glacier, Switzerland, using a glacier energy balance model of intermediate complexity. Before uncertainty assessment, the model was tuned to observed mass balance for the investigated time period and its robustness was tested by comparing observed and modelled mass balance over 11 years, yielding very small deviations. Both systematic and random uncertainties are assigned to twelve input parameters and their respective values estimated from the literature or from available meteorological data sets. The calculated overall uncertainty in the model output is dominated by systematic errors and amounts to 0.7 m w.e. or approximately 10% of total melt over the investigated time span. In order to provide a first order estimate on variability in uncertainty depending on the quality of input data, we conducted a further experiment, calculating overall uncertainty for different levels of uncertainty in measured global radiation and air temperature. Our results show that the output of a well calibrated model is subject to considerable uncertainties, in particular when applied for extrapolation in time and space where systematic errors are likely to be an important issue.http://www.the-cryosphere.net/2/191/2008/tc-2-191-2008.pdf
spellingShingle H. Machguth
R. S. Purves
J. Oerlemans
M. Hoelzle
F. Paul
Exploring uncertainty in glacier mass balance modelling with Monte Carlo simulation
The Cryosphere
title Exploring uncertainty in glacier mass balance modelling with Monte Carlo simulation
title_full Exploring uncertainty in glacier mass balance modelling with Monte Carlo simulation
title_fullStr Exploring uncertainty in glacier mass balance modelling with Monte Carlo simulation
title_full_unstemmed Exploring uncertainty in glacier mass balance modelling with Monte Carlo simulation
title_short Exploring uncertainty in glacier mass balance modelling with Monte Carlo simulation
title_sort exploring uncertainty in glacier mass balance modelling with monte carlo simulation
url http://www.the-cryosphere.net/2/191/2008/tc-2-191-2008.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hmachguth exploringuncertaintyinglaciermassbalancemodellingwithmontecarlosimulation
AT rspurves exploringuncertaintyinglaciermassbalancemodellingwithmontecarlosimulation
AT joerlemans exploringuncertaintyinglaciermassbalancemodellingwithmontecarlosimulation
AT mhoelzle exploringuncertaintyinglaciermassbalancemodellingwithmontecarlosimulation
AT fpaul exploringuncertaintyinglaciermassbalancemodellingwithmontecarlosimulation