Comparison of intravenous lignocaine versus combination of lignocaine with diltiazem on attenuation of haemodynamic responses to tracheal extubation in patients undergoing abdominal surgeries under general anaesthesia: A randomized double blind interventi

Background: Tracheal intubation is frequently associated with cardiovascular stress response characterized by hypertension, tachycardia and increased serum concentration of catecholamines and similar phenomenon is also seen during extubation. During Endotracheal extubation increase in sympathoadrene...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kanchan Chauhan, Vivek Gupta, Sunil Chauhan, Manoj Soni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Creative Pharma Assent 2022-12-01
Series:Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://japtronline.com/index.php/joapr/article/view/297
_version_ 1797842694564741120
author Kanchan Chauhan
Vivek Gupta
Sunil Chauhan
Manoj Soni
author_facet Kanchan Chauhan
Vivek Gupta
Sunil Chauhan
Manoj Soni
author_sort Kanchan Chauhan
collection DOAJ
description Background: Tracheal intubation is frequently associated with cardiovascular stress response characterized by hypertension, tachycardia and increased serum concentration of catecholamines and similar phenomenon is also seen during extubation. During Endotracheal extubation increase in sympathoadrenergic activity is caused by epipharyngeal and laryngopharyngeal stimulation. Objective: The aim and objectives of this study are to compare the effect of combination of intravenous (i.v.) diltiazem 0.1 mg/kg and i.v lignocaine 1.0 mg/kg vs intravenous lignocaine alone to attenuate haemodynamic extubation responses and airway reflexes during extubation. Material and method: This study was undertaken with 72 patients belonging to the age group 20–60 years with physical status ASA Classes I and II of either sex. Group A received injection diltiazem 0.1 mg/kg and lignocaine 1 mg/kg. Group B received injection lignocaine 1 mg/kg with normal saline. In this study, the drug dosage was fixed based on the previous studies. Result: The baseline values of heart rate,systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were statistically comparable between the two groups. The heart rate, SBP, DBP, and MAP was significantly high in group A (lignocaine) as compared to group B (diltiazem with lignocaine) at extubation and  till 1 min, 3 min, 5 min,  and 10 min post extubation (pvalue<0.05). Conclusion: Combined diltiazem and lignocaine provides more effective prophylaxis than lignocaine alone for attenuating the cardiovascular responses to tracheal extubation
first_indexed 2024-04-09T16:53:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3716bc28f85d4664b14df4202f753437
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2348-0335
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T16:53:17Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Creative Pharma Assent
record_format Article
series Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Research
spelling doaj.art-3716bc28f85d4664b14df4202f7534372023-04-21T09:28:16ZengCreative Pharma AssentJournal of Applied Pharmaceutical Research2348-03352022-12-01104253310.18231/j.joapr.2022.10.4.25.33298Comparison of intravenous lignocaine versus combination of lignocaine with diltiazem on attenuation of haemodynamic responses to tracheal extubation in patients undergoing abdominal surgeries under general anaesthesia: A randomized double blind interventiKanchan Chauhan0Vivek Gupta1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3203-2755Sunil Chauhan2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0158-7427Manoj Soni3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6011-4849Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, S.M.S. Medical College and Attached Group of Hospitals, Sawai Mansingh road, Jaipur, 302004Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, S.M.S. Medical College and Attached Group of Hospitals, Sawai Mansingh road, Jaipur, 302004Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, S.M.S. Medical College and Attached Group of Hospitals, Sawai Mansingh road, Jaipur, 302004Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, S.M.S. Medical College and Attached Group of Hospitals, Sawai Mansingh road, Jaipur, 302004Background: Tracheal intubation is frequently associated with cardiovascular stress response characterized by hypertension, tachycardia and increased serum concentration of catecholamines and similar phenomenon is also seen during extubation. During Endotracheal extubation increase in sympathoadrenergic activity is caused by epipharyngeal and laryngopharyngeal stimulation. Objective: The aim and objectives of this study are to compare the effect of combination of intravenous (i.v.) diltiazem 0.1 mg/kg and i.v lignocaine 1.0 mg/kg vs intravenous lignocaine alone to attenuate haemodynamic extubation responses and airway reflexes during extubation. Material and method: This study was undertaken with 72 patients belonging to the age group 20–60 years with physical status ASA Classes I and II of either sex. Group A received injection diltiazem 0.1 mg/kg and lignocaine 1 mg/kg. Group B received injection lignocaine 1 mg/kg with normal saline. In this study, the drug dosage was fixed based on the previous studies. Result: The baseline values of heart rate,systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were statistically comparable between the two groups. The heart rate, SBP, DBP, and MAP was significantly high in group A (lignocaine) as compared to group B (diltiazem with lignocaine) at extubation and  till 1 min, 3 min, 5 min,  and 10 min post extubation (pvalue<0.05). Conclusion: Combined diltiazem and lignocaine provides more effective prophylaxis than lignocaine alone for attenuating the cardiovascular responses to tracheal extubationhttps://japtronline.com/index.php/joapr/article/view/297lignocainediltiazemattenuationhemodynamic responsetracheal extubation
spellingShingle Kanchan Chauhan
Vivek Gupta
Sunil Chauhan
Manoj Soni
Comparison of intravenous lignocaine versus combination of lignocaine with diltiazem on attenuation of haemodynamic responses to tracheal extubation in patients undergoing abdominal surgeries under general anaesthesia: A randomized double blind interventi
Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Research
lignocaine
diltiazem
attenuation
hemodynamic response
tracheal extubation
title Comparison of intravenous lignocaine versus combination of lignocaine with diltiazem on attenuation of haemodynamic responses to tracheal extubation in patients undergoing abdominal surgeries under general anaesthesia: A randomized double blind interventi
title_full Comparison of intravenous lignocaine versus combination of lignocaine with diltiazem on attenuation of haemodynamic responses to tracheal extubation in patients undergoing abdominal surgeries under general anaesthesia: A randomized double blind interventi
title_fullStr Comparison of intravenous lignocaine versus combination of lignocaine with diltiazem on attenuation of haemodynamic responses to tracheal extubation in patients undergoing abdominal surgeries under general anaesthesia: A randomized double blind interventi
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of intravenous lignocaine versus combination of lignocaine with diltiazem on attenuation of haemodynamic responses to tracheal extubation in patients undergoing abdominal surgeries under general anaesthesia: A randomized double blind interventi
title_short Comparison of intravenous lignocaine versus combination of lignocaine with diltiazem on attenuation of haemodynamic responses to tracheal extubation in patients undergoing abdominal surgeries under general anaesthesia: A randomized double blind interventi
title_sort comparison of intravenous lignocaine versus combination of lignocaine with diltiazem on attenuation of haemodynamic responses to tracheal extubation in patients undergoing abdominal surgeries under general anaesthesia a randomized double blind interventi
topic lignocaine
diltiazem
attenuation
hemodynamic response
tracheal extubation
url https://japtronline.com/index.php/joapr/article/view/297
work_keys_str_mv AT kanchanchauhan comparisonofintravenouslignocaineversuscombinationoflignocainewithdiltiazemonattenuationofhaemodynamicresponsestotrachealextubationinpatientsundergoingabdominalsurgeriesundergeneralanaesthesiaarandomizeddoubleblindinterventi
AT vivekgupta comparisonofintravenouslignocaineversuscombinationoflignocainewithdiltiazemonattenuationofhaemodynamicresponsestotrachealextubationinpatientsundergoingabdominalsurgeriesundergeneralanaesthesiaarandomizeddoubleblindinterventi
AT sunilchauhan comparisonofintravenouslignocaineversuscombinationoflignocainewithdiltiazemonattenuationofhaemodynamicresponsestotrachealextubationinpatientsundergoingabdominalsurgeriesundergeneralanaesthesiaarandomizeddoubleblindinterventi
AT manojsoni comparisonofintravenouslignocaineversuscombinationoflignocainewithdiltiazemonattenuationofhaemodynamicresponsestotrachealextubationinpatientsundergoingabdominalsurgeriesundergeneralanaesthesiaarandomizeddoubleblindinterventi