Toward a harmonization of sustainability criteria for alternative marine fuels

The discussion around shipping decarbonization has accelerated rapidly in 2020 and 2021. The growing studies on alternative marine fuels based on different criteria are indicative of both the complexities involved in marine fuels evaluation and absence of a consistent framework for assessment of alt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mehrnaz Ashrafi, Jane Lister, David Gillen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-01-01
Series:Maritime Transport Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666822X2200003X
_version_ 1811293753807208448
author Mehrnaz Ashrafi
Jane Lister
David Gillen
author_facet Mehrnaz Ashrafi
Jane Lister
David Gillen
author_sort Mehrnaz Ashrafi
collection DOAJ
description The discussion around shipping decarbonization has accelerated rapidly in 2020 and 2021. The growing studies on alternative marine fuels based on different criteria are indicative of both the complexities involved in marine fuels evaluation and absence of a consistent framework for assessment of alternative marine fuels from a holistic perspective. There is a recent call for an integrated evaluation model for alternative marine fuels with respect to economic, environmental, and social criteria. In this study, we develop and present a comprehensive and integrated set of sustainability criteria that are relevant for evaluating alternative marine fuels. First, we provide an overview of different alternative marine fuel pathways and assess the current challenges associated with adopting alternative marine fuels. Second, we develop 18 sustainability criteria, identified through the academic and trade literature and validated through a multi-stakeholder participatory approach (based on the input from 70 maritime experts), for a systematic and consistent evaluation of marine fuels. Third, based on an in-depth survey, we evaluate maritime stakeholder perspectives on the importance of sustainability criteria. And finally, we provide a discussion of key policy implications and areas for future studies. Our analysis reveals the current degree of agreement amongst maritime stakeholders in the debate about the importance of multiple, and often conflicting, criteria for evaluating marine fuels; the top five most important criteria are regulatory compliance, life cycle GHG, fuel cost, air pollution, and occupational health and safety. The analysis also looks at the importance ranking of each criterion from the perspective of individual maritime stakeholder groups. These findings provide decision-makers with a platform to understand priorities and interests of maritime stakeholder groups for the choice of marine fuels.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T05:06:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-371e6847e0904fbfb9eaea7bf4194d8b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-822X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T05:06:09Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Maritime Transport Research
spelling doaj.art-371e6847e0904fbfb9eaea7bf4194d8b2022-12-22T03:01:10ZengElsevierMaritime Transport Research2666-822X2022-01-013100052Toward a harmonization of sustainability criteria for alternative marine fuelsMehrnaz Ashrafi0Jane Lister1David Gillen2Corresponding author: Mehrnaz Ashrafi, The University of British Columbia’s Sauder School of Business, Canada; Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, CanadaSauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, CanadaSauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, CanadaThe discussion around shipping decarbonization has accelerated rapidly in 2020 and 2021. The growing studies on alternative marine fuels based on different criteria are indicative of both the complexities involved in marine fuels evaluation and absence of a consistent framework for assessment of alternative marine fuels from a holistic perspective. There is a recent call for an integrated evaluation model for alternative marine fuels with respect to economic, environmental, and social criteria. In this study, we develop and present a comprehensive and integrated set of sustainability criteria that are relevant for evaluating alternative marine fuels. First, we provide an overview of different alternative marine fuel pathways and assess the current challenges associated with adopting alternative marine fuels. Second, we develop 18 sustainability criteria, identified through the academic and trade literature and validated through a multi-stakeholder participatory approach (based on the input from 70 maritime experts), for a systematic and consistent evaluation of marine fuels. Third, based on an in-depth survey, we evaluate maritime stakeholder perspectives on the importance of sustainability criteria. And finally, we provide a discussion of key policy implications and areas for future studies. Our analysis reveals the current degree of agreement amongst maritime stakeholders in the debate about the importance of multiple, and often conflicting, criteria for evaluating marine fuels; the top five most important criteria are regulatory compliance, life cycle GHG, fuel cost, air pollution, and occupational health and safety. The analysis also looks at the importance ranking of each criterion from the perspective of individual maritime stakeholder groups. These findings provide decision-makers with a platform to understand priorities and interests of maritime stakeholder groups for the choice of marine fuels.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666822X2200003XShipping decarbonizationAlternative marine fuelsSustainabilityMulti-stakeholder participatory approach
spellingShingle Mehrnaz Ashrafi
Jane Lister
David Gillen
Toward a harmonization of sustainability criteria for alternative marine fuels
Maritime Transport Research
Shipping decarbonization
Alternative marine fuels
Sustainability
Multi-stakeholder participatory approach
title Toward a harmonization of sustainability criteria for alternative marine fuels
title_full Toward a harmonization of sustainability criteria for alternative marine fuels
title_fullStr Toward a harmonization of sustainability criteria for alternative marine fuels
title_full_unstemmed Toward a harmonization of sustainability criteria for alternative marine fuels
title_short Toward a harmonization of sustainability criteria for alternative marine fuels
title_sort toward a harmonization of sustainability criteria for alternative marine fuels
topic Shipping decarbonization
Alternative marine fuels
Sustainability
Multi-stakeholder participatory approach
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666822X2200003X
work_keys_str_mv AT mehrnazashrafi towardaharmonizationofsustainabilitycriteriaforalternativemarinefuels
AT janelister towardaharmonizationofsustainabilitycriteriaforalternativemarinefuels
AT davidgillen towardaharmonizationofsustainabilitycriteriaforalternativemarinefuels