Finite Element Analysis of an Implant-Supported FDP with Different Connector Heights

All-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) tend to fracture in the connector areas, due to the concentration of tensile stresses. This study aimed to evaluate the role of connector height on the stress distribution of a posterior three-unit implant-supported all-ceramic FDP using finite element anal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura H. J. Alberto, Lohitha Kalluri, Josephine F. Esquivel-Upshaw, Yuanyuan Duan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-11-01
Series:Symmetry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/11/2334
_version_ 1797466369954938880
author Laura H. J. Alberto
Lohitha Kalluri
Josephine F. Esquivel-Upshaw
Yuanyuan Duan
author_facet Laura H. J. Alberto
Lohitha Kalluri
Josephine F. Esquivel-Upshaw
Yuanyuan Duan
author_sort Laura H. J. Alberto
collection DOAJ
description All-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) tend to fracture in the connector areas, due to the concentration of tensile stresses. This study aimed to evaluate the role of connector height on the stress distribution of a posterior three-unit implant-supported all-ceramic FDP using finite element analysis (FEA). Two titanium dental implants, their abutments, screws, and a three-unit all-ceramic FDP were scanned using a micro-CT scanner. Three 3D models with altered distal connector heights (3, 4, and 5 mm) were generated and analyzed on ABAQUS FEA software. The maximum principal stress values in MPa observed for each model with different connector heights and their respective locations (MA = mesial abutment; DA = distal abutment; F = framework; V = veneer) were: 3 mm—219 (MA), 88 (DA), 11 (F), 16 (V); 4 mm—194 (MA), 82 (DA), 8 (F), 18 (V); 5 mm—194 (MA), 80 (DA), 8 (F), and 18 (V). All the assembled models demonstrated the peak stresses at the neck area on the mesial abutments. The connector height had a significant influence on the stress distribution of the prosthesis. The models with higher distal connectors (4 and 5 mm) had a lower and more uniform distribution of maximum principal stresses (except for the veneer layer) when compared with the model with the smallest distal connector.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T18:36:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-372c8427f60443a19950c21e93ee937f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-8994
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T18:36:00Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Symmetry
spelling doaj.art-372c8427f60443a19950c21e93ee937f2023-11-24T07:08:40ZengMDPI AGSymmetry2073-89942022-11-011411233410.3390/sym14112334Finite Element Analysis of an Implant-Supported FDP with Different Connector HeightsLaura H. J. Alberto0Lohitha Kalluri1Josephine F. Esquivel-Upshaw2Yuanyuan Duan3Department of Biomedical Materials Science, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USADepartment of Biomedical Materials Science, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USADepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences, Division of Prosthodontics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USADepartment of Biomedical Materials Science, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USAAll-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) tend to fracture in the connector areas, due to the concentration of tensile stresses. This study aimed to evaluate the role of connector height on the stress distribution of a posterior three-unit implant-supported all-ceramic FDP using finite element analysis (FEA). Two titanium dental implants, their abutments, screws, and a three-unit all-ceramic FDP were scanned using a micro-CT scanner. Three 3D models with altered distal connector heights (3, 4, and 5 mm) were generated and analyzed on ABAQUS FEA software. The maximum principal stress values in MPa observed for each model with different connector heights and their respective locations (MA = mesial abutment; DA = distal abutment; F = framework; V = veneer) were: 3 mm—219 (MA), 88 (DA), 11 (F), 16 (V); 4 mm—194 (MA), 82 (DA), 8 (F), 18 (V); 5 mm—194 (MA), 80 (DA), 8 (F), and 18 (V). All the assembled models demonstrated the peak stresses at the neck area on the mesial abutments. The connector height had a significant influence on the stress distribution of the prosthesis. The models with higher distal connectors (4 and 5 mm) had a lower and more uniform distribution of maximum principal stresses (except for the veneer layer) when compared with the model with the smallest distal connector.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/11/2334all-ceramic FDPconnector designconnector heightdental biomaterialsdental implantsdesign parameters
spellingShingle Laura H. J. Alberto
Lohitha Kalluri
Josephine F. Esquivel-Upshaw
Yuanyuan Duan
Finite Element Analysis of an Implant-Supported FDP with Different Connector Heights
Symmetry
all-ceramic FDP
connector design
connector height
dental biomaterials
dental implants
design parameters
title Finite Element Analysis of an Implant-Supported FDP with Different Connector Heights
title_full Finite Element Analysis of an Implant-Supported FDP with Different Connector Heights
title_fullStr Finite Element Analysis of an Implant-Supported FDP with Different Connector Heights
title_full_unstemmed Finite Element Analysis of an Implant-Supported FDP with Different Connector Heights
title_short Finite Element Analysis of an Implant-Supported FDP with Different Connector Heights
title_sort finite element analysis of an implant supported fdp with different connector heights
topic all-ceramic FDP
connector design
connector height
dental biomaterials
dental implants
design parameters
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/11/2334
work_keys_str_mv AT laurahjalberto finiteelementanalysisofanimplantsupportedfdpwithdifferentconnectorheights
AT lohithakalluri finiteelementanalysisofanimplantsupportedfdpwithdifferentconnectorheights
AT josephinefesquivelupshaw finiteelementanalysisofanimplantsupportedfdpwithdifferentconnectorheights
AT yuanyuanduan finiteelementanalysisofanimplantsupportedfdpwithdifferentconnectorheights