The current status of clinical trials focusing on nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A comprehensive analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov database.

Clinical Trials have emerged as the main force in driving the development of medicine. However, little is known about the current status of clinical trials regarding nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This study aimed at providing a comprehensive landscape of NPC-related trials on the basis of Clinical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hao Peng, Lei Chen, Yu-Pei Chen, Wen-Fei Li, Ling-Long Tang, Ai-Hua Lin, Ying Sun, Jun Ma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5931495?pdf=render
_version_ 1818908251911094272
author Hao Peng
Lei Chen
Yu-Pei Chen
Wen-Fei Li
Ling-Long Tang
Ai-Hua Lin
Ying Sun
Jun Ma
author_facet Hao Peng
Lei Chen
Yu-Pei Chen
Wen-Fei Li
Ling-Long Tang
Ai-Hua Lin
Ying Sun
Jun Ma
author_sort Hao Peng
collection DOAJ
description Clinical Trials have emerged as the main force in driving the development of medicine. However, little is known about the current status of clinical trials regarding nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This study aimed at providing a comprehensive landscape of NPC-related trials on the basis of ClinicalTrials.gov database.We used the keyword "nasopharyngeal carcinoma" to search the ClinicalTrials.gov database and assessed the characteristics of these trials.Up to December 30, 2016, 462 eligible trials in total were identified, of which 222 (48.0%) recruited only NPC (NPC trials) and the other 240 (52.0%) recruited both NPC and other cancers (multiple cancer trials). Moreover, 47 (10.2%) were Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-related trials and 267 (57.8%) focused on metastatic/recurrent disease. Compared with NPC trials, the multiple cancer trials had a higher percentage of phase 1 (26.7% vs. 6.7%, P < 0.001) studies and more patients with metastatic/recurrent disease (72.5% vs. 41.9%, P < 0.001). Notably, non-EBV trials had more phase 2 or 3 (78.4% vs. 48.8%, P < 0.001) and interventional studies (89.5% vs. 70.7%, P = 0.002) than EBV trials. Obviously, more phase 2/3 or 3 trials were conducted in patients with non-metastatic/recurrent disease (29.4% vs. 4.9%, P < 0.001); however, metastatic/recurrent trials were more likely to be anticancer (94.6% vs. 63.6%, P < 0.001).The role of plasma EBV DNA in clinical trials is underestimated, and high-level randomized clinical trials should be performed for patients with metastatic/recurrent disease.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T22:08:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3739f08d514c45ab9dcc571d00630b99
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T22:08:03Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-3739f08d514c45ab9dcc571d00630b992022-12-21T20:03:58ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01135e019673010.1371/journal.pone.0196730The current status of clinical trials focusing on nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A comprehensive analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov database.Hao PengLei ChenYu-Pei ChenWen-Fei LiLing-Long TangAi-Hua LinYing SunJun MaClinical Trials have emerged as the main force in driving the development of medicine. However, little is known about the current status of clinical trials regarding nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This study aimed at providing a comprehensive landscape of NPC-related trials on the basis of ClinicalTrials.gov database.We used the keyword "nasopharyngeal carcinoma" to search the ClinicalTrials.gov database and assessed the characteristics of these trials.Up to December 30, 2016, 462 eligible trials in total were identified, of which 222 (48.0%) recruited only NPC (NPC trials) and the other 240 (52.0%) recruited both NPC and other cancers (multiple cancer trials). Moreover, 47 (10.2%) were Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-related trials and 267 (57.8%) focused on metastatic/recurrent disease. Compared with NPC trials, the multiple cancer trials had a higher percentage of phase 1 (26.7% vs. 6.7%, P < 0.001) studies and more patients with metastatic/recurrent disease (72.5% vs. 41.9%, P < 0.001). Notably, non-EBV trials had more phase 2 or 3 (78.4% vs. 48.8%, P < 0.001) and interventional studies (89.5% vs. 70.7%, P = 0.002) than EBV trials. Obviously, more phase 2/3 or 3 trials were conducted in patients with non-metastatic/recurrent disease (29.4% vs. 4.9%, P < 0.001); however, metastatic/recurrent trials were more likely to be anticancer (94.6% vs. 63.6%, P < 0.001).The role of plasma EBV DNA in clinical trials is underestimated, and high-level randomized clinical trials should be performed for patients with metastatic/recurrent disease.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5931495?pdf=render
spellingShingle Hao Peng
Lei Chen
Yu-Pei Chen
Wen-Fei Li
Ling-Long Tang
Ai-Hua Lin
Ying Sun
Jun Ma
The current status of clinical trials focusing on nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A comprehensive analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov database.
PLoS ONE
title The current status of clinical trials focusing on nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A comprehensive analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov database.
title_full The current status of clinical trials focusing on nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A comprehensive analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov database.
title_fullStr The current status of clinical trials focusing on nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A comprehensive analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov database.
title_full_unstemmed The current status of clinical trials focusing on nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A comprehensive analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov database.
title_short The current status of clinical trials focusing on nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A comprehensive analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov database.
title_sort current status of clinical trials focusing on nasopharyngeal carcinoma a comprehensive analysis of clinicaltrials gov database
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5931495?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT haopeng thecurrentstatusofclinicaltrialsfocusingonnasopharyngealcarcinomaacomprehensiveanalysisofclinicaltrialsgovdatabase
AT leichen thecurrentstatusofclinicaltrialsfocusingonnasopharyngealcarcinomaacomprehensiveanalysisofclinicaltrialsgovdatabase
AT yupeichen thecurrentstatusofclinicaltrialsfocusingonnasopharyngealcarcinomaacomprehensiveanalysisofclinicaltrialsgovdatabase
AT wenfeili thecurrentstatusofclinicaltrialsfocusingonnasopharyngealcarcinomaacomprehensiveanalysisofclinicaltrialsgovdatabase
AT linglongtang thecurrentstatusofclinicaltrialsfocusingonnasopharyngealcarcinomaacomprehensiveanalysisofclinicaltrialsgovdatabase
AT aihualin thecurrentstatusofclinicaltrialsfocusingonnasopharyngealcarcinomaacomprehensiveanalysisofclinicaltrialsgovdatabase
AT yingsun thecurrentstatusofclinicaltrialsfocusingonnasopharyngealcarcinomaacomprehensiveanalysisofclinicaltrialsgovdatabase
AT junma thecurrentstatusofclinicaltrialsfocusingonnasopharyngealcarcinomaacomprehensiveanalysisofclinicaltrialsgovdatabase
AT haopeng currentstatusofclinicaltrialsfocusingonnasopharyngealcarcinomaacomprehensiveanalysisofclinicaltrialsgovdatabase
AT leichen currentstatusofclinicaltrialsfocusingonnasopharyngealcarcinomaacomprehensiveanalysisofclinicaltrialsgovdatabase
AT yupeichen currentstatusofclinicaltrialsfocusingonnasopharyngealcarcinomaacomprehensiveanalysisofclinicaltrialsgovdatabase
AT wenfeili currentstatusofclinicaltrialsfocusingonnasopharyngealcarcinomaacomprehensiveanalysisofclinicaltrialsgovdatabase
AT linglongtang currentstatusofclinicaltrialsfocusingonnasopharyngealcarcinomaacomprehensiveanalysisofclinicaltrialsgovdatabase
AT aihualin currentstatusofclinicaltrialsfocusingonnasopharyngealcarcinomaacomprehensiveanalysisofclinicaltrialsgovdatabase
AT yingsun currentstatusofclinicaltrialsfocusingonnasopharyngealcarcinomaacomprehensiveanalysisofclinicaltrialsgovdatabase
AT junma currentstatusofclinicaltrialsfocusingonnasopharyngealcarcinomaacomprehensiveanalysisofclinicaltrialsgovdatabase