Bioconstruction and Bioerosion in the Northern Adriatic Coralligenous Reefs Quantified by X-Ray Computed Tomography

The northern Adriatic continental shelf hosts several coralligenous reefs rising from the sedimentary bottom and characterized by three main benthic assemblages, respectively, dominated by algal turfs, encrusting calcareous rhodophyte (ECRs) or erect sponges. Bioconstruction and bioerosion processes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eva Turicchia, Marco Abbiati, Matteo Bettuzzi, Barbara Calcinai, Maria Pia Morigi, Adam P. Summers, Massimo Ponti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Marine Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2021.790869/full
_version_ 1818332722075009024
author Eva Turicchia
Eva Turicchia
Eva Turicchia
Eva Turicchia
Marco Abbiati
Marco Abbiati
Marco Abbiati
Marco Abbiati
Matteo Bettuzzi
Matteo Bettuzzi
Barbara Calcinai
Maria Pia Morigi
Maria Pia Morigi
Adam P. Summers
Massimo Ponti
Massimo Ponti
Massimo Ponti
author_facet Eva Turicchia
Eva Turicchia
Eva Turicchia
Eva Turicchia
Marco Abbiati
Marco Abbiati
Marco Abbiati
Marco Abbiati
Matteo Bettuzzi
Matteo Bettuzzi
Barbara Calcinai
Maria Pia Morigi
Maria Pia Morigi
Adam P. Summers
Massimo Ponti
Massimo Ponti
Massimo Ponti
author_sort Eva Turicchia
collection DOAJ
description The northern Adriatic continental shelf hosts several coralligenous reefs rising from the sedimentary bottom and characterized by three main benthic assemblages, respectively, dominated by algal turfs, encrusting calcareous rhodophyte (ECRs) or erect sponges. Bioconstruction and bioerosion processes have been investigated using recruitment travertine limestone tiles deployed in a random site for each main benthic assemblages off Chioggia, 6.1–14.4 km offshore and 20.2–25.4 m depth. Tiles were retrieved after 3 and 12 years and analyzed by X-ray computed tomography (CT), allowing for non-destructively identifying and quantifying deposited and eroded limestone. The main builders were ECRs, serpulids, bryozoans, barnacles, and the bivalves Anomia ephippium, while the most effective borers were sponges from the genus Cliona and the bivalve Rocellaria dubia. The deposition of limestone after 12 years was greater at the site MR08 dominated by ECRs (12.52 ± 2.22 kg m–2), intermediate at the site P213 dominated by erect sponges (4.20 ± 1.24 kg m–2), and lower in the site P204 dominated by algal turfs (2.20 ± 0.72 kg m–2). At MR08, the deposition rate did not vary much over time (from 1.295 ± 0.270 to 1.080 ± 0.198 kg m–2 a–1), while in the other two sites, it significantly slowed down after the first survey period: from 0.952 ± 0.199 to 0.350 ± 0.103 kg m–2 a–1 at P213, and from 1.470 ± 0.462 to 0.203 ± 0.058 kg m–2 a–1 at P204. The amount of eroded limestone increased with the exposure time, with no significant differences among sites, from 1.13 ± 0.29 to 10.39 ± 1.14 kg m–2 on average at 3 and 12 years, respectively. The bioerosion rate also increased with the exposure time and was slightly higher at MR08 (from 0.682 ± 0.208 to 1.105 ± 0.088 kg m–2 a–1), mostly eroded by Cliona rhodensis in addition to C. viridis, compared to P204 (from 0.267 ± 0.078 to 0.676 ± 0.172 kg m–2 a–1) and P213 (from 0.179 ± 0.065 to 0.816 ± 0.171 kg m–2 a–1). Overall, bioconstruction has overcome the bioerosion processes in 3 years. In 12 years, the estimated net balance was essentially nil at all sites. Combining field experiment and CT analysis, this study provides the first quantification of the bioerosion and bioconstruction processes in the northern Adriatic coralligenous reefs, a fundamental step toward their conservation.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T13:40:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-374167d889ac48eeb5427139cd265a17
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-7745
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T13:40:15Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Marine Science
spelling doaj.art-374167d889ac48eeb5427139cd265a172022-12-21T23:43:36ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Marine Science2296-77452022-01-01810.3389/fmars.2021.790869790869Bioconstruction and Bioerosion in the Northern Adriatic Coralligenous Reefs Quantified by X-Ray Computed TomographyEva Turicchia0Eva Turicchia1Eva Turicchia2Eva Turicchia3Marco Abbiati4Marco Abbiati5Marco Abbiati6Marco Abbiati7Matteo Bettuzzi8Matteo Bettuzzi9Barbara Calcinai10Maria Pia Morigi11Maria Pia Morigi12Adam P. Summers13Massimo Ponti14Massimo Ponti15Massimo Ponti16Dipartimento di Beni Culturali, University of Bologna, Ravenna, ItalyCentro Interdipartimentale di Ricerca Industriale Fonti Rinnovabili, Ambiente, Mare ed Energia, University of Bologna, Ravenna, ItalyDipartimento di Scienze Biologiche, Geologiche e Ambientali, University of Bologna, Ravenna, ItalyConsorzio Nazionale Interuniversitario per le Scienze del Mare, Rome, ItalyDipartimento di Beni Culturali, University of Bologna, Ravenna, ItalyCentro Interdipartimentale di Ricerca Industriale Fonti Rinnovabili, Ambiente, Mare ed Energia, University of Bologna, Ravenna, ItalyConsorzio Nazionale Interuniversitario per le Scienze del Mare, Rome, ItalyIstituto di Scienze Marine, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Bologna, ItalyDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia “Augusto Righi,” University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyNational Institute of Nuclear Physics – Section of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyDipartimento di Scienze della Vita e dell’Ambiente, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, ItalyDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia “Augusto Righi,” University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyNational Institute of Nuclear Physics – Section of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyFriday Harbor Laboratories, University of Washington, Friday Harbor, WA, United StatesCentro Interdipartimentale di Ricerca Industriale Fonti Rinnovabili, Ambiente, Mare ed Energia, University of Bologna, Ravenna, ItalyDipartimento di Scienze Biologiche, Geologiche e Ambientali, University of Bologna, Ravenna, ItalyConsorzio Nazionale Interuniversitario per le Scienze del Mare, Rome, ItalyThe northern Adriatic continental shelf hosts several coralligenous reefs rising from the sedimentary bottom and characterized by three main benthic assemblages, respectively, dominated by algal turfs, encrusting calcareous rhodophyte (ECRs) or erect sponges. Bioconstruction and bioerosion processes have been investigated using recruitment travertine limestone tiles deployed in a random site for each main benthic assemblages off Chioggia, 6.1–14.4 km offshore and 20.2–25.4 m depth. Tiles were retrieved after 3 and 12 years and analyzed by X-ray computed tomography (CT), allowing for non-destructively identifying and quantifying deposited and eroded limestone. The main builders were ECRs, serpulids, bryozoans, barnacles, and the bivalves Anomia ephippium, while the most effective borers were sponges from the genus Cliona and the bivalve Rocellaria dubia. The deposition of limestone after 12 years was greater at the site MR08 dominated by ECRs (12.52 ± 2.22 kg m–2), intermediate at the site P213 dominated by erect sponges (4.20 ± 1.24 kg m–2), and lower in the site P204 dominated by algal turfs (2.20 ± 0.72 kg m–2). At MR08, the deposition rate did not vary much over time (from 1.295 ± 0.270 to 1.080 ± 0.198 kg m–2 a–1), while in the other two sites, it significantly slowed down after the first survey period: from 0.952 ± 0.199 to 0.350 ± 0.103 kg m–2 a–1 at P213, and from 1.470 ± 0.462 to 0.203 ± 0.058 kg m–2 a–1 at P204. The amount of eroded limestone increased with the exposure time, with no significant differences among sites, from 1.13 ± 0.29 to 10.39 ± 1.14 kg m–2 on average at 3 and 12 years, respectively. The bioerosion rate also increased with the exposure time and was slightly higher at MR08 (from 0.682 ± 0.208 to 1.105 ± 0.088 kg m–2 a–1), mostly eroded by Cliona rhodensis in addition to C. viridis, compared to P204 (from 0.267 ± 0.078 to 0.676 ± 0.172 kg m–2 a–1) and P213 (from 0.179 ± 0.065 to 0.816 ± 0.171 kg m–2 a–1). Overall, bioconstruction has overcome the bioerosion processes in 3 years. In 12 years, the estimated net balance was essentially nil at all sites. Combining field experiment and CT analysis, this study provides the first quantification of the bioerosion and bioconstruction processes in the northern Adriatic coralligenous reefs, a fundamental step toward their conservation.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2021.790869/fullMediterranean Seaecological processesaccretionbiogenic structuresrecruitment panels3D visualization
spellingShingle Eva Turicchia
Eva Turicchia
Eva Turicchia
Eva Turicchia
Marco Abbiati
Marco Abbiati
Marco Abbiati
Marco Abbiati
Matteo Bettuzzi
Matteo Bettuzzi
Barbara Calcinai
Maria Pia Morigi
Maria Pia Morigi
Adam P. Summers
Massimo Ponti
Massimo Ponti
Massimo Ponti
Bioconstruction and Bioerosion in the Northern Adriatic Coralligenous Reefs Quantified by X-Ray Computed Tomography
Frontiers in Marine Science
Mediterranean Sea
ecological processes
accretion
biogenic structures
recruitment panels
3D visualization
title Bioconstruction and Bioerosion in the Northern Adriatic Coralligenous Reefs Quantified by X-Ray Computed Tomography
title_full Bioconstruction and Bioerosion in the Northern Adriatic Coralligenous Reefs Quantified by X-Ray Computed Tomography
title_fullStr Bioconstruction and Bioerosion in the Northern Adriatic Coralligenous Reefs Quantified by X-Ray Computed Tomography
title_full_unstemmed Bioconstruction and Bioerosion in the Northern Adriatic Coralligenous Reefs Quantified by X-Ray Computed Tomography
title_short Bioconstruction and Bioerosion in the Northern Adriatic Coralligenous Reefs Quantified by X-Ray Computed Tomography
title_sort bioconstruction and bioerosion in the northern adriatic coralligenous reefs quantified by x ray computed tomography
topic Mediterranean Sea
ecological processes
accretion
biogenic structures
recruitment panels
3D visualization
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2021.790869/full
work_keys_str_mv AT evaturicchia bioconstructionandbioerosioninthenorthernadriaticcoralligenousreefsquantifiedbyxraycomputedtomography
AT evaturicchia bioconstructionandbioerosioninthenorthernadriaticcoralligenousreefsquantifiedbyxraycomputedtomography
AT evaturicchia bioconstructionandbioerosioninthenorthernadriaticcoralligenousreefsquantifiedbyxraycomputedtomography
AT evaturicchia bioconstructionandbioerosioninthenorthernadriaticcoralligenousreefsquantifiedbyxraycomputedtomography
AT marcoabbiati bioconstructionandbioerosioninthenorthernadriaticcoralligenousreefsquantifiedbyxraycomputedtomography
AT marcoabbiati bioconstructionandbioerosioninthenorthernadriaticcoralligenousreefsquantifiedbyxraycomputedtomography
AT marcoabbiati bioconstructionandbioerosioninthenorthernadriaticcoralligenousreefsquantifiedbyxraycomputedtomography
AT marcoabbiati bioconstructionandbioerosioninthenorthernadriaticcoralligenousreefsquantifiedbyxraycomputedtomography
AT matteobettuzzi bioconstructionandbioerosioninthenorthernadriaticcoralligenousreefsquantifiedbyxraycomputedtomography
AT matteobettuzzi bioconstructionandbioerosioninthenorthernadriaticcoralligenousreefsquantifiedbyxraycomputedtomography
AT barbaracalcinai bioconstructionandbioerosioninthenorthernadriaticcoralligenousreefsquantifiedbyxraycomputedtomography
AT mariapiamorigi bioconstructionandbioerosioninthenorthernadriaticcoralligenousreefsquantifiedbyxraycomputedtomography
AT mariapiamorigi bioconstructionandbioerosioninthenorthernadriaticcoralligenousreefsquantifiedbyxraycomputedtomography
AT adampsummers bioconstructionandbioerosioninthenorthernadriaticcoralligenousreefsquantifiedbyxraycomputedtomography
AT massimoponti bioconstructionandbioerosioninthenorthernadriaticcoralligenousreefsquantifiedbyxraycomputedtomography
AT massimoponti bioconstructionandbioerosioninthenorthernadriaticcoralligenousreefsquantifiedbyxraycomputedtomography
AT massimoponti bioconstructionandbioerosioninthenorthernadriaticcoralligenousreefsquantifiedbyxraycomputedtomography