Brain death debates: from bioethics to philosophy of science [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
50 years after its introduction, brain death remains controversial among scholars. The debates focus on one question: is brain death a good criterion for determining death? This question has been answered from various perspectives: medical, metaphysical, ethical, and legal or political. Most authors...
Main Author: | Alberto Molina Pérez |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2022-06-01
|
Series: | F1000Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://f1000research.com/articles/11-195/v2 |
Similar Items
-
Moral injury and the four pillars of bioethics [version 4; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Thomas F Heston, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01) -
Invisibility in global health: A case for disturbing bioethical frameworks [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
by: Chelsea Modlin, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01) -
Setting up child health and mortality prevention surveillance in Ethiopia [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
by: Anna C. Seale, et al.
Published: (2022-02-01) -
Case Report: Sudden death related to unrecognized cardiac hydatid cyst [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Yosra Mahjoub, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01) -
Bioethical language and its dialects and idiolects
by: Garrafa Volnei, et al.
Published: (1999-01-01)