Linking Federal Forest Restoration with Wood Utilization: Modeling Biomass Prices and Analyzing Forest Restoration Costs in the Northern Sierra Nevada

Over half of California’s forestland is managed by the US Forest Service, and the agency has identified a need to scale up forest restoration treatments in the state to one million acres per year by 2025. However, the high costs of mechanical fuel reduction and lack of markets for biomass pose signi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Camille Swezy, John Bailey, Woodam Chung
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2696
_version_ 1797534855458717696
author Camille Swezy
John Bailey
Woodam Chung
author_facet Camille Swezy
John Bailey
Woodam Chung
author_sort Camille Swezy
collection DOAJ
description Over half of California’s forestland is managed by the US Forest Service, and the agency has identified a need to scale up forest restoration treatments in the state to one million acres per year by 2025. However, the high costs of mechanical fuel reduction and lack of markets for biomass pose significant barriers to accomplishing this target. The objectives of this case study were: (1) to identify costs of forest restoration treatments on federally-managed land in the Northern Sierra under a variety of harvesting scenarios and haul distances to biomass facilities, and (2) to understand what market prices for biomass must be offered to support such efforts. We modeled silvicultural prescription and harvesting options, machine productivity and costs, and transportation costs to assess economic thresholds. Biomass harvest, chip, and haul costs ranged from $55/bone dry ton to $118/bone dry ton, depending on the harvesting system scenario and distance from the biomass disposal site. Results suggest that the cost of forest restoration far exceeds current market prices for biomass, and additional investment is needed to adequately pay for federal forest restoration in California. Additional takeaways include that biomass outlets closer to supply sources can reduce both haul costs and production costs, and local wood utilization campuses can play a key role in supporting forest restoration.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T11:36:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-37526782a42c49e19f7e52d752180a26
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T11:36:22Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-37526782a42c49e19f7e52d752180a262023-11-21T18:48:00ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732021-05-01149269610.3390/en14092696Linking Federal Forest Restoration with Wood Utilization: Modeling Biomass Prices and Analyzing Forest Restoration Costs in the Northern Sierra NevadaCamille Swezy0John Bailey1Woodam Chung2Department of Forest Engineering, Resources, and Management, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USADepartment of Forest Engineering, Resources, and Management, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USADepartment of Forest Engineering, Resources, and Management, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USAOver half of California’s forestland is managed by the US Forest Service, and the agency has identified a need to scale up forest restoration treatments in the state to one million acres per year by 2025. However, the high costs of mechanical fuel reduction and lack of markets for biomass pose significant barriers to accomplishing this target. The objectives of this case study were: (1) to identify costs of forest restoration treatments on federally-managed land in the Northern Sierra under a variety of harvesting scenarios and haul distances to biomass facilities, and (2) to understand what market prices for biomass must be offered to support such efforts. We modeled silvicultural prescription and harvesting options, machine productivity and costs, and transportation costs to assess economic thresholds. Biomass harvest, chip, and haul costs ranged from $55/bone dry ton to $118/bone dry ton, depending on the harvesting system scenario and distance from the biomass disposal site. Results suggest that the cost of forest restoration far exceeds current market prices for biomass, and additional investment is needed to adequately pay for federal forest restoration in California. Additional takeaways include that biomass outlets closer to supply sources can reduce both haul costs and production costs, and local wood utilization campuses can play a key role in supporting forest restoration.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2696woody biomassutilizationfederal forest restoration.forest managementrural developmentforest health
spellingShingle Camille Swezy
John Bailey
Woodam Chung
Linking Federal Forest Restoration with Wood Utilization: Modeling Biomass Prices and Analyzing Forest Restoration Costs in the Northern Sierra Nevada
Energies
woody biomass
utilization
federal forest restoration.
forest management
rural development
forest health
title Linking Federal Forest Restoration with Wood Utilization: Modeling Biomass Prices and Analyzing Forest Restoration Costs in the Northern Sierra Nevada
title_full Linking Federal Forest Restoration with Wood Utilization: Modeling Biomass Prices and Analyzing Forest Restoration Costs in the Northern Sierra Nevada
title_fullStr Linking Federal Forest Restoration with Wood Utilization: Modeling Biomass Prices and Analyzing Forest Restoration Costs in the Northern Sierra Nevada
title_full_unstemmed Linking Federal Forest Restoration with Wood Utilization: Modeling Biomass Prices and Analyzing Forest Restoration Costs in the Northern Sierra Nevada
title_short Linking Federal Forest Restoration with Wood Utilization: Modeling Biomass Prices and Analyzing Forest Restoration Costs in the Northern Sierra Nevada
title_sort linking federal forest restoration with wood utilization modeling biomass prices and analyzing forest restoration costs in the northern sierra nevada
topic woody biomass
utilization
federal forest restoration.
forest management
rural development
forest health
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2696
work_keys_str_mv AT camilleswezy linkingfederalforestrestorationwithwoodutilizationmodelingbiomasspricesandanalyzingforestrestorationcostsinthenorthernsierranevada
AT johnbailey linkingfederalforestrestorationwithwoodutilizationmodelingbiomasspricesandanalyzingforestrestorationcostsinthenorthernsierranevada
AT woodamchung linkingfederalforestrestorationwithwoodutilizationmodelingbiomasspricesandanalyzingforestrestorationcostsinthenorthernsierranevada