Field-In-Field Plan Versus Tangential Wedged Beam Plan in Chest Wall Radiotherapy of Post-Mastectomy Patients: Treatment Planning Study

Introduction: In this study, dose distribution of the chest wall in post-mastectomy breast cancer patients was evaluated and compared in the tangential wedged beam (TWB) and field-in-field (FIF) plans. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six patients with left-sided breast cancer were enrolled in this stu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mehran Yarahmadi, bahar faramarzi, abbas haghparast, zeinab saalehi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2017-12-01
Series:Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ijmp.mums.ac.ir/article_9164_1b68cb00c9d9b176e2d81ba1125980f8.pdf
_version_ 1819262589116350464
author Mehran Yarahmadi
bahar faramarzi
abbas haghparast
zeinab saalehi
author_facet Mehran Yarahmadi
bahar faramarzi
abbas haghparast
zeinab saalehi
author_sort Mehran Yarahmadi
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: In this study, dose distribution of the chest wall in post-mastectomy breast cancer patients was evaluated and compared in the tangential wedged beam (TWB) and field-in-field (FIF) plans. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six patients with left-sided breast cancer were enrolled in this study. The FIF and TWB plans were generated for each patient to compare dosimetric parameters of the chest wall. The maximum dose (Dmax), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), and uniformity index (UI) were defined and used for comparison of the dosimetric parameters of the planning target volume (PTV) in both FIF and TWB plans. The percentage of volumes receiving at least 10, 20, 30, and 40 Gy of the left lung and 5, 10, 20, 25 and 30 Gy of the heart were used to compare the dosimetric results of the organs at risk. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, version 20. Results: The FIF plan had significantly lower HI (P=0.000) than the TWB plan, indicating that the FIF plan was better than the TWB plan in PTV. The V40lung (15.36±4.35 vs. 18.37±4.42) and V30heart (8.15±3.75 vs. 10.94±3.94; P=0.000) were significantly lower in the FIF plan than in the TWB plan. In addition, the monitor unit (MU) was significantly lower in the FIF plan than in the TWB plan (227.76 vs. 323.59; P=0.000). Conclusion: The FIF plan significantly reduced the dose volume of the left lung and heart in post-mastectomy radiotherapy compared to the TWB plan. Therefore, the FIF plan is recommended for this purpose.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T20:00:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-37566fde5aef49f6a60c512e0d589d77
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2345-3672
2345-3672
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T20:00:06Z
publishDate 2017-12-01
publisher Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
spelling doaj.art-37566fde5aef49f6a60c512e0d589d772022-12-21T17:33:06ZengMashhad University of Medical SciencesIranian Journal of Medical Physics2345-36722345-36722017-12-0114425726310.22038/ijmp.2017.22982.12239164Field-In-Field Plan Versus Tangential Wedged Beam Plan in Chest Wall Radiotherapy of Post-Mastectomy Patients: Treatment Planning StudyMehran Yarahmadi0bahar faramarzi1abbas haghparast2zeinab saalehi3Medical Physics Dept., Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.Department of Medical Physics, School of medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Kermanshah, Iran.Tohid Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.Introduction: In this study, dose distribution of the chest wall in post-mastectomy breast cancer patients was evaluated and compared in the tangential wedged beam (TWB) and field-in-field (FIF) plans. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six patients with left-sided breast cancer were enrolled in this study. The FIF and TWB plans were generated for each patient to compare dosimetric parameters of the chest wall. The maximum dose (Dmax), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), and uniformity index (UI) were defined and used for comparison of the dosimetric parameters of the planning target volume (PTV) in both FIF and TWB plans. The percentage of volumes receiving at least 10, 20, 30, and 40 Gy of the left lung and 5, 10, 20, 25 and 30 Gy of the heart were used to compare the dosimetric results of the organs at risk. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, version 20. Results: The FIF plan had significantly lower HI (P=0.000) than the TWB plan, indicating that the FIF plan was better than the TWB plan in PTV. The V40lung (15.36±4.35 vs. 18.37±4.42) and V30heart (8.15±3.75 vs. 10.94±3.94; P=0.000) were significantly lower in the FIF plan than in the TWB plan. In addition, the monitor unit (MU) was significantly lower in the FIF plan than in the TWB plan (227.76 vs. 323.59; P=0.000). Conclusion: The FIF plan significantly reduced the dose volume of the left lung and heart in post-mastectomy radiotherapy compared to the TWB plan. Therefore, the FIF plan is recommended for this purpose.http://ijmp.mums.ac.ir/article_9164_1b68cb00c9d9b176e2d81ba1125980f8.pdfBreast CancerHigh-Energy X-RayField-In-Field TechniqueTreatment PlanningTWB Plan
spellingShingle Mehran Yarahmadi
bahar faramarzi
abbas haghparast
zeinab saalehi
Field-In-Field Plan Versus Tangential Wedged Beam Plan in Chest Wall Radiotherapy of Post-Mastectomy Patients: Treatment Planning Study
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Breast Cancer
High-Energy X-Ray
Field-In-Field Technique
Treatment Planning
TWB Plan
title Field-In-Field Plan Versus Tangential Wedged Beam Plan in Chest Wall Radiotherapy of Post-Mastectomy Patients: Treatment Planning Study
title_full Field-In-Field Plan Versus Tangential Wedged Beam Plan in Chest Wall Radiotherapy of Post-Mastectomy Patients: Treatment Planning Study
title_fullStr Field-In-Field Plan Versus Tangential Wedged Beam Plan in Chest Wall Radiotherapy of Post-Mastectomy Patients: Treatment Planning Study
title_full_unstemmed Field-In-Field Plan Versus Tangential Wedged Beam Plan in Chest Wall Radiotherapy of Post-Mastectomy Patients: Treatment Planning Study
title_short Field-In-Field Plan Versus Tangential Wedged Beam Plan in Chest Wall Radiotherapy of Post-Mastectomy Patients: Treatment Planning Study
title_sort field in field plan versus tangential wedged beam plan in chest wall radiotherapy of post mastectomy patients treatment planning study
topic Breast Cancer
High-Energy X-Ray
Field-In-Field Technique
Treatment Planning
TWB Plan
url http://ijmp.mums.ac.ir/article_9164_1b68cb00c9d9b176e2d81ba1125980f8.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mehranyarahmadi fieldinfieldplanversustangentialwedgedbeamplaninchestwallradiotherapyofpostmastectomypatientstreatmentplanningstudy
AT baharfaramarzi fieldinfieldplanversustangentialwedgedbeamplaninchestwallradiotherapyofpostmastectomypatientstreatmentplanningstudy
AT abbashaghparast fieldinfieldplanversustangentialwedgedbeamplaninchestwallradiotherapyofpostmastectomypatientstreatmentplanningstudy
AT zeinabsaalehi fieldinfieldplanversustangentialwedgedbeamplaninchestwallradiotherapyofpostmastectomypatientstreatmentplanningstudy