A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

<i>Background and Objective</i>: Gingival biotype can be assessed using a variety of invasive and non-invasive procedures, such as direct probing, transgingival probing, ultrasound-guided approaches, and, for the more sophisticated, cone-beam computed tomography. The aim of this study wa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gotam Das, Abdul Razzaq Ahmed, Ghazala Suleman, Abhishek Lal, Muhammad Haseeb Rana, Naseer Ahmed, Suraj Arora
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-09-01
Series:Medicina
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/58/9/1312
_version_ 1797485000259534848
author Gotam Das
Abdul Razzaq Ahmed
Ghazala Suleman
Abhishek Lal
Muhammad Haseeb Rana
Naseer Ahmed
Suraj Arora
author_facet Gotam Das
Abdul Razzaq Ahmed
Ghazala Suleman
Abhishek Lal
Muhammad Haseeb Rana
Naseer Ahmed
Suraj Arora
author_sort Gotam Das
collection DOAJ
description <i>Background and Objective</i>: Gingival biotype can be assessed using a variety of invasive and non-invasive procedures, such as direct probing, transgingival probing, ultrasound-guided approaches, and, for the more sophisticated, cone-beam computed tomography. The aim of this study was to evaluate gingival biotype in relation to transgingival probing and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). <i>Materials and Methods</i>: This study included a total of two hundred healthy individuals. Gingival thickness was assessed and measured from the right and left maxillary central incisor teeth using CBCT and transgingival probing of the attached gingiva. The measurements were analyzed with regard to tooth type (central incisor). Linear measurements for gingival biotype were measured using both methods. Correlations and differences between measurement methods were assessed. <i>Results</i>: The mean age of study participants was 32.49 ± 8.61 years. The radiographic measurements on CBCT were 1.34 ± 0.17 mm for the right central and 1.28 ± 0.21mm for the left central. The transgingival probing measurements were 1.31 ± 0.18 for the right central and 1.22 ± 0.21mm for the left central. <i>Conclusion</i>: As per the results of this study, there is a significant positive correlation between transgingival probing and CBCT measurements of gingival biotypes.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T23:12:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-376755b6c3064f2eafb2288084b48eb9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1010-660X
1648-9144
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T23:12:31Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Medicina
spelling doaj.art-376755b6c3064f2eafb2288084b48eb92023-11-23T17:41:30ZengMDPI AGMedicina1010-660X1648-91442022-09-01589131210.3390/medicina58091312A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed TomographyGotam Das0Abdul Razzaq Ahmed1Ghazala Suleman2Abhishek Lal3Muhammad Haseeb Rana4Naseer Ahmed5Suraj Arora6Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 61321, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 61321, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 61321, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Prosthodontics, Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine, Karachi 75500, PakistanDepartment of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 61321, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Prosthodontics, Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine, Karachi 75500, PakistanDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 61321, Saudi Arabia<i>Background and Objective</i>: Gingival biotype can be assessed using a variety of invasive and non-invasive procedures, such as direct probing, transgingival probing, ultrasound-guided approaches, and, for the more sophisticated, cone-beam computed tomography. The aim of this study was to evaluate gingival biotype in relation to transgingival probing and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). <i>Materials and Methods</i>: This study included a total of two hundred healthy individuals. Gingival thickness was assessed and measured from the right and left maxillary central incisor teeth using CBCT and transgingival probing of the attached gingiva. The measurements were analyzed with regard to tooth type (central incisor). Linear measurements for gingival biotype were measured using both methods. Correlations and differences between measurement methods were assessed. <i>Results</i>: The mean age of study participants was 32.49 ± 8.61 years. The radiographic measurements on CBCT were 1.34 ± 0.17 mm for the right central and 1.28 ± 0.21mm for the left central. The transgingival probing measurements were 1.31 ± 0.18 for the right central and 1.22 ± 0.21mm for the left central. <i>Conclusion</i>: As per the results of this study, there is a significant positive correlation between transgingival probing and CBCT measurements of gingival biotypes.https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/58/9/1312gingival biotypeestheticsbiologic widthtransgingival probingcone-beam computed tomography
spellingShingle Gotam Das
Abdul Razzaq Ahmed
Ghazala Suleman
Abhishek Lal
Muhammad Haseeb Rana
Naseer Ahmed
Suraj Arora
A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Medicina
gingival biotype
esthetics
biologic width
transgingival probing
cone-beam computed tomography
title A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
title_full A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
title_fullStr A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
title_short A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
title_sort comparative evaluation of dentogingival tissue using transgingival probing and cone beam computed tomography
topic gingival biotype
esthetics
biologic width
transgingival probing
cone-beam computed tomography
url https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/58/9/1312
work_keys_str_mv AT gotamdas acomparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography
AT abdulrazzaqahmed acomparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography
AT ghazalasuleman acomparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography
AT abhisheklal acomparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography
AT muhammadhaseebrana acomparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography
AT naseerahmed acomparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography
AT surajarora acomparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography
AT gotamdas comparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography
AT abdulrazzaqahmed comparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography
AT ghazalasuleman comparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography
AT abhisheklal comparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography
AT muhammadhaseebrana comparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography
AT naseerahmed comparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography
AT surajarora comparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography