A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
<i>Background and Objective</i>: Gingival biotype can be assessed using a variety of invasive and non-invasive procedures, such as direct probing, transgingival probing, ultrasound-guided approaches, and, for the more sophisticated, cone-beam computed tomography. The aim of this study wa...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-09-01
|
Series: | Medicina |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/58/9/1312 |
_version_ | 1797485000259534848 |
---|---|
author | Gotam Das Abdul Razzaq Ahmed Ghazala Suleman Abhishek Lal Muhammad Haseeb Rana Naseer Ahmed Suraj Arora |
author_facet | Gotam Das Abdul Razzaq Ahmed Ghazala Suleman Abhishek Lal Muhammad Haseeb Rana Naseer Ahmed Suraj Arora |
author_sort | Gotam Das |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <i>Background and Objective</i>: Gingival biotype can be assessed using a variety of invasive and non-invasive procedures, such as direct probing, transgingival probing, ultrasound-guided approaches, and, for the more sophisticated, cone-beam computed tomography. The aim of this study was to evaluate gingival biotype in relation to transgingival probing and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). <i>Materials and Methods</i>: This study included a total of two hundred healthy individuals. Gingival thickness was assessed and measured from the right and left maxillary central incisor teeth using CBCT and transgingival probing of the attached gingiva. The measurements were analyzed with regard to tooth type (central incisor). Linear measurements for gingival biotype were measured using both methods. Correlations and differences between measurement methods were assessed. <i>Results</i>: The mean age of study participants was 32.49 ± 8.61 years. The radiographic measurements on CBCT were 1.34 ± 0.17 mm for the right central and 1.28 ± 0.21mm for the left central. The transgingival probing measurements were 1.31 ± 0.18 for the right central and 1.22 ± 0.21mm for the left central. <i>Conclusion</i>: As per the results of this study, there is a significant positive correlation between transgingival probing and CBCT measurements of gingival biotypes. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T23:12:31Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-376755b6c3064f2eafb2288084b48eb9 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1010-660X 1648-9144 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T23:12:31Z |
publishDate | 2022-09-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Medicina |
spelling | doaj.art-376755b6c3064f2eafb2288084b48eb92023-11-23T17:41:30ZengMDPI AGMedicina1010-660X1648-91442022-09-01589131210.3390/medicina58091312A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed TomographyGotam Das0Abdul Razzaq Ahmed1Ghazala Suleman2Abhishek Lal3Muhammad Haseeb Rana4Naseer Ahmed5Suraj Arora6Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 61321, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 61321, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 61321, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Prosthodontics, Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine, Karachi 75500, PakistanDepartment of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 61321, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Prosthodontics, Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine, Karachi 75500, PakistanDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 61321, Saudi Arabia<i>Background and Objective</i>: Gingival biotype can be assessed using a variety of invasive and non-invasive procedures, such as direct probing, transgingival probing, ultrasound-guided approaches, and, for the more sophisticated, cone-beam computed tomography. The aim of this study was to evaluate gingival biotype in relation to transgingival probing and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). <i>Materials and Methods</i>: This study included a total of two hundred healthy individuals. Gingival thickness was assessed and measured from the right and left maxillary central incisor teeth using CBCT and transgingival probing of the attached gingiva. The measurements were analyzed with regard to tooth type (central incisor). Linear measurements for gingival biotype were measured using both methods. Correlations and differences between measurement methods were assessed. <i>Results</i>: The mean age of study participants was 32.49 ± 8.61 years. The radiographic measurements on CBCT were 1.34 ± 0.17 mm for the right central and 1.28 ± 0.21mm for the left central. The transgingival probing measurements were 1.31 ± 0.18 for the right central and 1.22 ± 0.21mm for the left central. <i>Conclusion</i>: As per the results of this study, there is a significant positive correlation between transgingival probing and CBCT measurements of gingival biotypes.https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/58/9/1312gingival biotypeestheticsbiologic widthtransgingival probingcone-beam computed tomography |
spellingShingle | Gotam Das Abdul Razzaq Ahmed Ghazala Suleman Abhishek Lal Muhammad Haseeb Rana Naseer Ahmed Suraj Arora A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Medicina gingival biotype esthetics biologic width transgingival probing cone-beam computed tomography |
title | A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |
title_full | A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |
title_short | A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of dentogingival tissue using transgingival probing and cone beam computed tomography |
topic | gingival biotype esthetics biologic width transgingival probing cone-beam computed tomography |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/58/9/1312 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gotamdas acomparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography AT abdulrazzaqahmed acomparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography AT ghazalasuleman acomparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography AT abhisheklal acomparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography AT muhammadhaseebrana acomparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography AT naseerahmed acomparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography AT surajarora acomparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography AT gotamdas comparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography AT abdulrazzaqahmed comparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography AT ghazalasuleman comparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography AT abhisheklal comparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography AT muhammadhaseebrana comparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography AT naseerahmed comparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography AT surajarora comparativeevaluationofdentogingivaltissueusingtransgingivalprobingandconebeamcomputedtomography |