Dealing with indeterminate outcomes in antimalarial drug efficacy trials: a comparison between complete case analysis, multiple imputation and inverse probability weighting

Abstract Background Antimalarial clinical efficacy studies for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria frequently encounter situations in which molecular genotyping is unable to discriminate between parasitic recurrence, either new infection or recrudescence. The current WHO guideline recommends...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Prabin Dahal, Kasia Stepniewska, Philippe J. Guerin, Umberto D’Alessandro, Ric N. Price, Julie A. Simpson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-11-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-019-0856-z
_version_ 1811207265250705408
author Prabin Dahal
Kasia Stepniewska
Philippe J. Guerin
Umberto D’Alessandro
Ric N. Price
Julie A. Simpson
author_facet Prabin Dahal
Kasia Stepniewska
Philippe J. Guerin
Umberto D’Alessandro
Ric N. Price
Julie A. Simpson
author_sort Prabin Dahal
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Antimalarial clinical efficacy studies for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria frequently encounter situations in which molecular genotyping is unable to discriminate between parasitic recurrence, either new infection or recrudescence. The current WHO guideline recommends excluding these individuals with indeterminate outcomes in a complete case (CC) analysis. Data from the four artemisinin-based combination (4ABC) trial was used to compare the performance of multiple imputation (MI) and inverse probability weighting (IPW) against the standard CC analysis for dealing with indeterminate recurrences. Methods 3369 study participants from the multicentre study (4ABC trial) with molecularly defined parasitic recurrence treated with three artemisinin-based combination therapies were used to represent a complete dataset. A set proportion of recurrent infections (10, 30 and 45%) were reclassified as missing using two mechanisms: a completely random selection (mechanism 1); missingness weakly dependent (mechanism 2a) and strongly dependent (mechanism 2b) on treatment and transmission intensity. The performance of MI, IPW and CC approaches in estimating the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) probability of parasitic recrudescence at day 28 was then compared. In addition, the maximum likelihood estimate of the cured proportion was presented for further comparison (analytical solution). Performance measures (bias, relative bias, standard error and coverage) were reported as an average from 1000 simulation runs. Results The CC analyses resulted in absolute underestimation of K-M probability of day 28 recrudescence by up to 1.7% and were associated with reduced precision and poor coverage across all the scenarios studied. Both MI and IPW method performed better (greater consistency and greater efficiency) compared to CC analysis. In the absence of censoring, the analytical solution provided the most consistent and accurate estimate of cured proportion compared to the CC analyses. Conclusions The widely used CC approach underestimates antimalarial failure; IPW and MI procedures provided efficient and consistent estimates and should be considered when reporting the results of antimalarial clinical trials, especially in areas of high transmission, where the proportion of indeterminate outcomes could be large. The analytical solution estimating the cured proportion could provide an alternative approach, in scenarios with minimal censoring due to loss to follow-up or new infections.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T04:01:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-376a34d64a9449fd9558a5f6ed79d600
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2288
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T04:01:32Z
publishDate 2019-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Research Methodology
spelling doaj.art-376a34d64a9449fd9558a5f6ed79d6002022-12-22T03:48:42ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882019-11-0119111710.1186/s12874-019-0856-zDealing with indeterminate outcomes in antimalarial drug efficacy trials: a comparison between complete case analysis, multiple imputation and inverse probability weightingPrabin Dahal0Kasia Stepniewska1Philippe J. Guerin2Umberto D’Alessandro3Ric N. Price4Julie A. Simpson5WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN)WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN)WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN)Medical Research Council UnitWorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN)Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of MelbourneAbstract Background Antimalarial clinical efficacy studies for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria frequently encounter situations in which molecular genotyping is unable to discriminate between parasitic recurrence, either new infection or recrudescence. The current WHO guideline recommends excluding these individuals with indeterminate outcomes in a complete case (CC) analysis. Data from the four artemisinin-based combination (4ABC) trial was used to compare the performance of multiple imputation (MI) and inverse probability weighting (IPW) against the standard CC analysis for dealing with indeterminate recurrences. Methods 3369 study participants from the multicentre study (4ABC trial) with molecularly defined parasitic recurrence treated with three artemisinin-based combination therapies were used to represent a complete dataset. A set proportion of recurrent infections (10, 30 and 45%) were reclassified as missing using two mechanisms: a completely random selection (mechanism 1); missingness weakly dependent (mechanism 2a) and strongly dependent (mechanism 2b) on treatment and transmission intensity. The performance of MI, IPW and CC approaches in estimating the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) probability of parasitic recrudescence at day 28 was then compared. In addition, the maximum likelihood estimate of the cured proportion was presented for further comparison (analytical solution). Performance measures (bias, relative bias, standard error and coverage) were reported as an average from 1000 simulation runs. Results The CC analyses resulted in absolute underestimation of K-M probability of day 28 recrudescence by up to 1.7% and were associated with reduced precision and poor coverage across all the scenarios studied. Both MI and IPW method performed better (greater consistency and greater efficiency) compared to CC analysis. In the absence of censoring, the analytical solution provided the most consistent and accurate estimate of cured proportion compared to the CC analyses. Conclusions The widely used CC approach underestimates antimalarial failure; IPW and MI procedures provided efficient and consistent estimates and should be considered when reporting the results of antimalarial clinical trials, especially in areas of high transmission, where the proportion of indeterminate outcomes could be large. The analytical solution estimating the cured proportion could provide an alternative approach, in scenarios with minimal censoring due to loss to follow-up or new infections.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-019-0856-zPlasmodium falciparumEfficacyIndeterminate outcomesMultiple imputationInverse probability weighting
spellingShingle Prabin Dahal
Kasia Stepniewska
Philippe J. Guerin
Umberto D’Alessandro
Ric N. Price
Julie A. Simpson
Dealing with indeterminate outcomes in antimalarial drug efficacy trials: a comparison between complete case analysis, multiple imputation and inverse probability weighting
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Plasmodium falciparum
Efficacy
Indeterminate outcomes
Multiple imputation
Inverse probability weighting
title Dealing with indeterminate outcomes in antimalarial drug efficacy trials: a comparison between complete case analysis, multiple imputation and inverse probability weighting
title_full Dealing with indeterminate outcomes in antimalarial drug efficacy trials: a comparison between complete case analysis, multiple imputation and inverse probability weighting
title_fullStr Dealing with indeterminate outcomes in antimalarial drug efficacy trials: a comparison between complete case analysis, multiple imputation and inverse probability weighting
title_full_unstemmed Dealing with indeterminate outcomes in antimalarial drug efficacy trials: a comparison between complete case analysis, multiple imputation and inverse probability weighting
title_short Dealing with indeterminate outcomes in antimalarial drug efficacy trials: a comparison between complete case analysis, multiple imputation and inverse probability weighting
title_sort dealing with indeterminate outcomes in antimalarial drug efficacy trials a comparison between complete case analysis multiple imputation and inverse probability weighting
topic Plasmodium falciparum
Efficacy
Indeterminate outcomes
Multiple imputation
Inverse probability weighting
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-019-0856-z
work_keys_str_mv AT prabindahal dealingwithindeterminateoutcomesinantimalarialdrugefficacytrialsacomparisonbetweencompletecaseanalysismultipleimputationandinverseprobabilityweighting
AT kasiastepniewska dealingwithindeterminateoutcomesinantimalarialdrugefficacytrialsacomparisonbetweencompletecaseanalysismultipleimputationandinverseprobabilityweighting
AT philippejguerin dealingwithindeterminateoutcomesinantimalarialdrugefficacytrialsacomparisonbetweencompletecaseanalysismultipleimputationandinverseprobabilityweighting
AT umbertodalessandro dealingwithindeterminateoutcomesinantimalarialdrugefficacytrialsacomparisonbetweencompletecaseanalysismultipleimputationandinverseprobabilityweighting
AT ricnprice dealingwithindeterminateoutcomesinantimalarialdrugefficacytrialsacomparisonbetweencompletecaseanalysismultipleimputationandinverseprobabilityweighting
AT julieasimpson dealingwithindeterminateoutcomesinantimalarialdrugefficacytrialsacomparisonbetweencompletecaseanalysismultipleimputationandinverseprobabilityweighting