Effect of Single Dose of Antimicrobial Administration at Birth on Fecal Microbiota Development and Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Piglets

Optimization of antimicrobial use in swine management systems requires full understanding of antimicrobial-induced changes on the developmental dynamics of gut microbiota and the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impacts of early life...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohamed Zeineldin, Ameer Megahed, Brandi Burton, Benjamin Blair, Brian Aldridge, James F. Lowe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01414/full
_version_ 1818062122055106560
author Mohamed Zeineldin
Mohamed Zeineldin
Mohamed Zeineldin
Ameer Megahed
Ameer Megahed
Brandi Burton
Benjamin Blair
Brian Aldridge
James F. Lowe
author_facet Mohamed Zeineldin
Mohamed Zeineldin
Mohamed Zeineldin
Ameer Megahed
Ameer Megahed
Brandi Burton
Benjamin Blair
Brian Aldridge
James F. Lowe
author_sort Mohamed Zeineldin
collection DOAJ
description Optimization of antimicrobial use in swine management systems requires full understanding of antimicrobial-induced changes on the developmental dynamics of gut microbiota and the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impacts of early life antimicrobial intervention on fecal microbiota development, and prevalence of selected ARGs (ermB, tetO, tetW, tetC, sulI, sulII, and blaCTX–M) in neonatal piglets. A total of 48 litters were randomly allocated into one of six treatment groups soon after birth. Treatments were as follows: control (CONT), ceftiofur crystalline free acid (CCFA), ceftiofur hydrochloride (CHC), oxytetracycline (OTC), procaine penicillin G (PPG), and tulathromycin (TUL). Fecal swabs were collected from piglets at days 0 (prior to treatment), 5, 10, 15, and 20 post treatment. Sequencing analysis of the V3-V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene and selected ARGs were performed using the Illumina Miseq platform. Our results showed that, while early life antimicrobial prophylaxis had no effect on individual weight gain, or mortality, it was associated with minor shifts in the composition of fecal microbiota and noticeable changes in the abundance of selected ARGs. Unifrac distance metrics revealed that the microbial communities of the piglets that received different treatments (CCFA, CHC, OTC, PPG, and TUL) did not cluster distinctly from CONT piglets. Compared to CONT group, PPG-treated piglets exhibited a significant increase in the relative abundance of ermB and tetW at day 20 of life. Tulathromycin treatment also resulted in a significant increase in the abundance of tetW at days 10 and 20, and ermB at day 20. Collectively, these results demonstrate that the shifts in fecal microbiota structure caused by perinatal antimicrobial intervention are modest and limited to particular groups of microbial taxa. However, early life PPG and TUL intervention could promote the selection of ARGs in herds. While additional investigations are required to explore the consistency of these findings across larger populations, these results could open the door to new perspectives on the utility of early life antimicrobial administration to healthy neonates in swine management systems.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T13:59:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3776eccdb06840bbbe7b838739b96a9f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-302X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T13:59:11Z
publishDate 2019-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Microbiology
spelling doaj.art-3776eccdb06840bbbe7b838739b96a9f2022-12-22T01:45:50ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2019-06-011010.3389/fmicb.2019.01414449153Effect of Single Dose of Antimicrobial Administration at Birth on Fecal Microbiota Development and Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in PigletsMohamed Zeineldin0Mohamed Zeineldin1Mohamed Zeineldin2Ameer Megahed3Ameer Megahed4Brandi Burton5Benjamin Blair6Brian Aldridge7James F. Lowe8Integrated Food Animal Management Systems, Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Champaign, IL, United StatesDepartment of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Benha University, Benha, EgyptInfectious Genomic of One Health, Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Champaign, IL, United StatesIntegrated Food Animal Management Systems, Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Champaign, IL, United StatesDepartment of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Benha University, Benha, EgyptIntegrated Food Animal Management Systems, Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Champaign, IL, United StatesIntegrated Food Animal Management Systems, Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Champaign, IL, United StatesIntegrated Food Animal Management Systems, Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Champaign, IL, United StatesIntegrated Food Animal Management Systems, Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Champaign, IL, United StatesOptimization of antimicrobial use in swine management systems requires full understanding of antimicrobial-induced changes on the developmental dynamics of gut microbiota and the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impacts of early life antimicrobial intervention on fecal microbiota development, and prevalence of selected ARGs (ermB, tetO, tetW, tetC, sulI, sulII, and blaCTX–M) in neonatal piglets. A total of 48 litters were randomly allocated into one of six treatment groups soon after birth. Treatments were as follows: control (CONT), ceftiofur crystalline free acid (CCFA), ceftiofur hydrochloride (CHC), oxytetracycline (OTC), procaine penicillin G (PPG), and tulathromycin (TUL). Fecal swabs were collected from piglets at days 0 (prior to treatment), 5, 10, 15, and 20 post treatment. Sequencing analysis of the V3-V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene and selected ARGs were performed using the Illumina Miseq platform. Our results showed that, while early life antimicrobial prophylaxis had no effect on individual weight gain, or mortality, it was associated with minor shifts in the composition of fecal microbiota and noticeable changes in the abundance of selected ARGs. Unifrac distance metrics revealed that the microbial communities of the piglets that received different treatments (CCFA, CHC, OTC, PPG, and TUL) did not cluster distinctly from CONT piglets. Compared to CONT group, PPG-treated piglets exhibited a significant increase in the relative abundance of ermB and tetW at day 20 of life. Tulathromycin treatment also resulted in a significant increase in the abundance of tetW at days 10 and 20, and ermB at day 20. Collectively, these results demonstrate that the shifts in fecal microbiota structure caused by perinatal antimicrobial intervention are modest and limited to particular groups of microbial taxa. However, early life PPG and TUL intervention could promote the selection of ARGs in herds. While additional investigations are required to explore the consistency of these findings across larger populations, these results could open the door to new perspectives on the utility of early life antimicrobial administration to healthy neonates in swine management systems.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01414/fullantimicrobialmicrobiotaneonatal pigletsresistance genesfecal
spellingShingle Mohamed Zeineldin
Mohamed Zeineldin
Mohamed Zeineldin
Ameer Megahed
Ameer Megahed
Brandi Burton
Benjamin Blair
Brian Aldridge
James F. Lowe
Effect of Single Dose of Antimicrobial Administration at Birth on Fecal Microbiota Development and Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Piglets
Frontiers in Microbiology
antimicrobial
microbiota
neonatal piglets
resistance genes
fecal
title Effect of Single Dose of Antimicrobial Administration at Birth on Fecal Microbiota Development and Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Piglets
title_full Effect of Single Dose of Antimicrobial Administration at Birth on Fecal Microbiota Development and Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Piglets
title_fullStr Effect of Single Dose of Antimicrobial Administration at Birth on Fecal Microbiota Development and Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Piglets
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Single Dose of Antimicrobial Administration at Birth on Fecal Microbiota Development and Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Piglets
title_short Effect of Single Dose of Antimicrobial Administration at Birth on Fecal Microbiota Development and Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Piglets
title_sort effect of single dose of antimicrobial administration at birth on fecal microbiota development and prevalence of antimicrobial resistance genes in piglets
topic antimicrobial
microbiota
neonatal piglets
resistance genes
fecal
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01414/full
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedzeineldin effectofsingledoseofantimicrobialadministrationatbirthonfecalmicrobiotadevelopmentandprevalenceofantimicrobialresistancegenesinpiglets
AT mohamedzeineldin effectofsingledoseofantimicrobialadministrationatbirthonfecalmicrobiotadevelopmentandprevalenceofantimicrobialresistancegenesinpiglets
AT mohamedzeineldin effectofsingledoseofantimicrobialadministrationatbirthonfecalmicrobiotadevelopmentandprevalenceofantimicrobialresistancegenesinpiglets
AT ameermegahed effectofsingledoseofantimicrobialadministrationatbirthonfecalmicrobiotadevelopmentandprevalenceofantimicrobialresistancegenesinpiglets
AT ameermegahed effectofsingledoseofantimicrobialadministrationatbirthonfecalmicrobiotadevelopmentandprevalenceofantimicrobialresistancegenesinpiglets
AT brandiburton effectofsingledoseofantimicrobialadministrationatbirthonfecalmicrobiotadevelopmentandprevalenceofantimicrobialresistancegenesinpiglets
AT benjaminblair effectofsingledoseofantimicrobialadministrationatbirthonfecalmicrobiotadevelopmentandprevalenceofantimicrobialresistancegenesinpiglets
AT brianaldridge effectofsingledoseofantimicrobialadministrationatbirthonfecalmicrobiotadevelopmentandprevalenceofantimicrobialresistancegenesinpiglets
AT jamesflowe effectofsingledoseofantimicrobialadministrationatbirthonfecalmicrobiotadevelopmentandprevalenceofantimicrobialresistancegenesinpiglets