Comparison of the efficacy and safety between palliative biliary stent placement and duct clearance among elderly patients with choledocholithiasis: a propensity score-matched analysis

Abstract Objectives This study aimed to evaluate and compare the outcomes of palliative endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) and complete stone removal among elderly patients with choledocholithiasis using propensity score matching. Methods From April 2012 to October 2017, 161 patients aged 75 years an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Koh Kitagawa, Akira Mitoro, Takahiro Ozutsumi, Masanori Furukawa, Yukihisa Fujinaga, Norihisa Nishimura, Yasuhiko Sawada, Tadashi Namisaki, Takemi Akahane, Hitoshi Yoshiji
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-10-01
Series:BMC Gastroenterology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01956-6
_version_ 1818355730208522240
author Koh Kitagawa
Akira Mitoro
Takahiro Ozutsumi
Masanori Furukawa
Yukihisa Fujinaga
Norihisa Nishimura
Yasuhiko Sawada
Tadashi Namisaki
Takemi Akahane
Hitoshi Yoshiji
author_facet Koh Kitagawa
Akira Mitoro
Takahiro Ozutsumi
Masanori Furukawa
Yukihisa Fujinaga
Norihisa Nishimura
Yasuhiko Sawada
Tadashi Namisaki
Takemi Akahane
Hitoshi Yoshiji
author_sort Koh Kitagawa
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives This study aimed to evaluate and compare the outcomes of palliative endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) and complete stone removal among elderly patients with choledocholithiasis using propensity score matching. Methods From April 2012 to October 2017, 161 patients aged 75 years and older with choledocholithiasis underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at our institution. Among them, 136 (84.5%) had complete stone removal, and 25 (15.5%) underwent palliative EBS without further intervention until symptom occurrence. The median age of the EBS group was significantly higher than that of the complete stone removal group. The proportion of patients with dementia, cerebral infarction, preserved gallbladder with gallstones, and surgically altered anatomy was higher in the EBS group than in the complete stone removal group. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for different factors. In total, 50 matched patients (n = 25 in each group) were analyzed. Results The median duration of cholangitis-free periods was significantly shorter in the EBS group (596 days) than in the complete stone removal group. About half of patients in the EBS group required retreatment and rehospitalization for cholangitis during the observation period. Cholangitis was mainly caused by stent migration. There was no significant difference in terms of mortality rate and procedure-related adverse events between the two groups. Death was commonly attributed to underlying diseases. However, one patient in the EBS group died due to severe cholangitis. Conclusions Palliative EBS should be indicated only to patients with choledocholithiasis who have a poor prognosis.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T19:45:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3777389673b24984984436a500676209
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-230X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T19:45:57Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Gastroenterology
spelling doaj.art-3777389673b24984984436a5006762092022-12-21T23:33:33ZengBMCBMC Gastroenterology1471-230X2021-10-012111910.1186/s12876-021-01956-6Comparison of the efficacy and safety between palliative biliary stent placement and duct clearance among elderly patients with choledocholithiasis: a propensity score-matched analysisKoh Kitagawa0Akira Mitoro1Takahiro Ozutsumi2Masanori Furukawa3Yukihisa Fujinaga4Norihisa Nishimura5Yasuhiko Sawada6Tadashi Namisaki7Takemi Akahane8Hitoshi Yoshiji9Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical UniversityDivision of Endoscopy, Nara Medical UniversityDivision of Endoscopy, Nara Medical UniversityDivision of Endoscopy, Nara Medical UniversityDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical UniversityDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical UniversityDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical UniversityDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical UniversityDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical UniversityDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical UniversityAbstract Objectives This study aimed to evaluate and compare the outcomes of palliative endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) and complete stone removal among elderly patients with choledocholithiasis using propensity score matching. Methods From April 2012 to October 2017, 161 patients aged 75 years and older with choledocholithiasis underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at our institution. Among them, 136 (84.5%) had complete stone removal, and 25 (15.5%) underwent palliative EBS without further intervention until symptom occurrence. The median age of the EBS group was significantly higher than that of the complete stone removal group. The proportion of patients with dementia, cerebral infarction, preserved gallbladder with gallstones, and surgically altered anatomy was higher in the EBS group than in the complete stone removal group. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for different factors. In total, 50 matched patients (n = 25 in each group) were analyzed. Results The median duration of cholangitis-free periods was significantly shorter in the EBS group (596 days) than in the complete stone removal group. About half of patients in the EBS group required retreatment and rehospitalization for cholangitis during the observation period. Cholangitis was mainly caused by stent migration. There was no significant difference in terms of mortality rate and procedure-related adverse events between the two groups. Death was commonly attributed to underlying diseases. However, one patient in the EBS group died due to severe cholangitis. Conclusions Palliative EBS should be indicated only to patients with choledocholithiasis who have a poor prognosis.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01956-6AgedCholedocholithiasisEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyLithotripsyStents
spellingShingle Koh Kitagawa
Akira Mitoro
Takahiro Ozutsumi
Masanori Furukawa
Yukihisa Fujinaga
Norihisa Nishimura
Yasuhiko Sawada
Tadashi Namisaki
Takemi Akahane
Hitoshi Yoshiji
Comparison of the efficacy and safety between palliative biliary stent placement and duct clearance among elderly patients with choledocholithiasis: a propensity score-matched analysis
BMC Gastroenterology
Aged
Choledocholithiasis
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
Lithotripsy
Stents
title Comparison of the efficacy and safety between palliative biliary stent placement and duct clearance among elderly patients with choledocholithiasis: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_full Comparison of the efficacy and safety between palliative biliary stent placement and duct clearance among elderly patients with choledocholithiasis: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of the efficacy and safety between palliative biliary stent placement and duct clearance among elderly patients with choledocholithiasis: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the efficacy and safety between palliative biliary stent placement and duct clearance among elderly patients with choledocholithiasis: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_short Comparison of the efficacy and safety between palliative biliary stent placement and duct clearance among elderly patients with choledocholithiasis: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_sort comparison of the efficacy and safety between palliative biliary stent placement and duct clearance among elderly patients with choledocholithiasis a propensity score matched analysis
topic Aged
Choledocholithiasis
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
Lithotripsy
Stents
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01956-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kohkitagawa comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetybetweenpalliativebiliarystentplacementandductclearanceamongelderlypatientswithcholedocholithiasisapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT akiramitoro comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetybetweenpalliativebiliarystentplacementandductclearanceamongelderlypatientswithcholedocholithiasisapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT takahiroozutsumi comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetybetweenpalliativebiliarystentplacementandductclearanceamongelderlypatientswithcholedocholithiasisapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT masanorifurukawa comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetybetweenpalliativebiliarystentplacementandductclearanceamongelderlypatientswithcholedocholithiasisapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT yukihisafujinaga comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetybetweenpalliativebiliarystentplacementandductclearanceamongelderlypatientswithcholedocholithiasisapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT norihisanishimura comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetybetweenpalliativebiliarystentplacementandductclearanceamongelderlypatientswithcholedocholithiasisapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT yasuhikosawada comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetybetweenpalliativebiliarystentplacementandductclearanceamongelderlypatientswithcholedocholithiasisapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT tadashinamisaki comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetybetweenpalliativebiliarystentplacementandductclearanceamongelderlypatientswithcholedocholithiasisapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT takemiakahane comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetybetweenpalliativebiliarystentplacementandductclearanceamongelderlypatientswithcholedocholithiasisapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT hitoshiyoshiji comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetybetweenpalliativebiliarystentplacementandductclearanceamongelderlypatientswithcholedocholithiasisapropensityscorematchedanalysis