Critical Analysis of Retrials Causes in Iran’s Act of Civil Procedure: With Comparative Study in French Law

The retrial is one of the extraordinary methods to complain against decisions whereby the plaintiff demands the issuing court to reverse the final judgment which has been pronounced by the court.  If the court accepts the request, the action is reviewed again. Article 426 of Iran’s Act of Civil Proc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ali Abbas Hayati
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS) 2018-07-01
Series:پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی
Subjects:
Online Access:https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_3309_5697bf6385430330d256d7e58a37dd09.pdf
_version_ 1826878653827383296
author Ali Abbas Hayati
author_facet Ali Abbas Hayati
author_sort Ali Abbas Hayati
collection DOAJ
description The retrial is one of the extraordinary methods to complain against decisions whereby the plaintiff demands the issuing court to reverse the final judgment which has been pronounced by the court.  If the court accepts the request, the action is reviewed again. Article 426 of Iran’s Act of Civil Procedure counted seven causes for rehearing. Critical analyses of these causes show us the drawn foundation for retrial, and it is required first, 1-3 sub-sections of the aforementioned section would be removed, and second two other causes would be added. The first case happens when it is proved that the judgment has been pronounced based on false testimony or witness statement or oath, and second case happens if it is demonstrated before the court that the issuing judge has gone wrong that is effective in being the judgment unjust.
first_indexed 2025-02-17T01:43:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-37789fb0e5394641bad806ecc71ba052
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2383-1650
language fas
last_indexed 2025-02-17T01:43:05Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)
record_format Article
series پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی
spelling doaj.art-37789fb0e5394641bad806ecc71ba0522025-01-13T05:30:57ZfasInstitute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی2383-16502018-07-011851872063309Critical Analysis of Retrials Causes in Iran’s Act of Civil Procedure: With Comparative Study in French LawAli Abbas Hayati0Assistant Professor, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi UniversityThe retrial is one of the extraordinary methods to complain against decisions whereby the plaintiff demands the issuing court to reverse the final judgment which has been pronounced by the court.  If the court accepts the request, the action is reviewed again. Article 426 of Iran’s Act of Civil Procedure counted seven causes for rehearing. Critical analyses of these causes show us the drawn foundation for retrial, and it is required first, 1-3 sub-sections of the aforementioned section would be removed, and second two other causes would be added. The first case happens when it is proved that the judgment has been pronounced based on false testimony or witness statement or oath, and second case happens if it is demonstrated before the court that the issuing judge has gone wrong that is effective in being the judgment unjust.https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_3309_5697bf6385430330d256d7e58a37dd09.pdfretrialrehearing’s causesjudgmentfinal judgmentreversing a judgment
spellingShingle Ali Abbas Hayati
Critical Analysis of Retrials Causes in Iran’s Act of Civil Procedure: With Comparative Study in French Law
پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی
retrial
rehearing’s causes
judgment
final judgment
reversing a judgment
title Critical Analysis of Retrials Causes in Iran’s Act of Civil Procedure: With Comparative Study in French Law
title_full Critical Analysis of Retrials Causes in Iran’s Act of Civil Procedure: With Comparative Study in French Law
title_fullStr Critical Analysis of Retrials Causes in Iran’s Act of Civil Procedure: With Comparative Study in French Law
title_full_unstemmed Critical Analysis of Retrials Causes in Iran’s Act of Civil Procedure: With Comparative Study in French Law
title_short Critical Analysis of Retrials Causes in Iran’s Act of Civil Procedure: With Comparative Study in French Law
title_sort critical analysis of retrials causes in iran s act of civil procedure with comparative study in french law
topic retrial
rehearing’s causes
judgment
final judgment
reversing a judgment
url https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_3309_5697bf6385430330d256d7e58a37dd09.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT aliabbashayati criticalanalysisofretrialscausesiniransactofcivilprocedurewithcomparativestudyinfrenchlaw