OVERRIDING MANDATORY PROVISIONS IN CROATIAN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW

Overriding mandatory provisions are mandatory provisions that are applicable in situations with an international element. The author analyses overriding mandatory norms in the European private international law and in the Croatian national private international law. The definition of such norms prov...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dora Zgrabljić Rotar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law 2021-12-01
Series:Pravni Vjesnik
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hrcak.srce.hr/ojs/index.php/pravni-vjesnik/article/view/13256
_version_ 1818141012296466432
author Dora Zgrabljić Rotar
author_facet Dora Zgrabljić Rotar
author_sort Dora Zgrabljić Rotar
collection DOAJ
description Overriding mandatory provisions are mandatory provisions that are applicable in situations with an international element. The author analyses overriding mandatory norms in the European private international law and in the Croatian national private international law. The definition of such norms provided in the 2017 Croatian Private International Law Act is almost a verbatim copy of the definition provided in the Rome I Regulation on the law applicable to contractual obligations. The 1982 Croatian Private International Law Act did not provide for a definition of overriding mandatory norms but it was uniformly accepted in the scholarly interpretations that those types of mandatory norms were accepted by the Croatian private international law system. Moreover, the 1982 PIL Act included a substantive family law provision, which was, in essence, an overriding mandatory provision. However, Croatian courts and practitioners have been reluctant to refer explicitly to an applied norm as an overriding mandatory one. The reasons behind that might be that that the courts were better acquainted with the public policy exception, since public policy was explicitly mentioned in the 1982 PIL Act, as well as in some other legal acts. In addition, the legislator does not explicitly note that a provision is an overriding mandatory one in the provision itself, which leads to the outcome that the courts and other practitioners are burdened with a complex task of interpretation of a provision they think might be an overriding mandatory one. The author aims at providing guidelines to facilitate that task.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T10:53:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-377ba558a95a41358fb1da5042161778
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0352-5317
1849-0840
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T10:53:07Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law
record_format Article
series Pravni Vjesnik
spelling doaj.art-377ba558a95a41358fb1da50421617782022-12-22T01:10:11ZengJosip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of LawPravni Vjesnik0352-53171849-08402021-12-01373-48110010.25234/pv/1325610966OVERRIDING MANDATORY PROVISIONS IN CROATIAN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAWDora Zgrabljić Rotar0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6558-4532Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb, Trg Republike Hrvatske 14, 10000 Zagreb, Republic of CroatiaOverriding mandatory provisions are mandatory provisions that are applicable in situations with an international element. The author analyses overriding mandatory norms in the European private international law and in the Croatian national private international law. The definition of such norms provided in the 2017 Croatian Private International Law Act is almost a verbatim copy of the definition provided in the Rome I Regulation on the law applicable to contractual obligations. The 1982 Croatian Private International Law Act did not provide for a definition of overriding mandatory norms but it was uniformly accepted in the scholarly interpretations that those types of mandatory norms were accepted by the Croatian private international law system. Moreover, the 1982 PIL Act included a substantive family law provision, which was, in essence, an overriding mandatory provision. However, Croatian courts and practitioners have been reluctant to refer explicitly to an applied norm as an overriding mandatory one. The reasons behind that might be that that the courts were better acquainted with the public policy exception, since public policy was explicitly mentioned in the 1982 PIL Act, as well as in some other legal acts. In addition, the legislator does not explicitly note that a provision is an overriding mandatory one in the provision itself, which leads to the outcome that the courts and other practitioners are burdened with a complex task of interpretation of a provision they think might be an overriding mandatory one. The author aims at providing guidelines to facilitate that task.https://hrcak.srce.hr/ojs/index.php/pravni-vjesnik/article/view/13256overriding mandatory provisionsrome i regulation2017 croatian private international law actregulatory norms
spellingShingle Dora Zgrabljić Rotar
OVERRIDING MANDATORY PROVISIONS IN CROATIAN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW
Pravni Vjesnik
overriding mandatory provisions
rome i regulation
2017 croatian private international law act
regulatory norms
title OVERRIDING MANDATORY PROVISIONS IN CROATIAN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW
title_full OVERRIDING MANDATORY PROVISIONS IN CROATIAN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW
title_fullStr OVERRIDING MANDATORY PROVISIONS IN CROATIAN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW
title_full_unstemmed OVERRIDING MANDATORY PROVISIONS IN CROATIAN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW
title_short OVERRIDING MANDATORY PROVISIONS IN CROATIAN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW
title_sort overriding mandatory provisions in croatian private international law
topic overriding mandatory provisions
rome i regulation
2017 croatian private international law act
regulatory norms
url https://hrcak.srce.hr/ojs/index.php/pravni-vjesnik/article/view/13256
work_keys_str_mv AT dorazgrabljicrotar overridingmandatoryprovisionsincroatianprivateinternationallaw