Variations in band reporting rate and implications for kill rate in Greater Snow Geese

We assessed spatial and temporal variation in reporting probability of banded Greater Snow Geese (Chen caerulescens atlantica) shot by hunters in eastern North America and evaluated potential residual biases in kill rate estimation. Adult Greater Snow Geese were marked with reward (value: US$10, $20...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guillaume Souchay, Olivier Gimenez, Gilles Gauthier, Roger Pradel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2014-06-01
Series:Avian Conservation and Ecology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ace-eco.org/vol9/iss1/art1/
_version_ 1797970845155459072
author Guillaume Souchay
Olivier Gimenez
Gilles Gauthier
Roger Pradel
author_facet Guillaume Souchay
Olivier Gimenez
Gilles Gauthier
Roger Pradel
author_sort Guillaume Souchay
collection DOAJ
description We assessed spatial and temporal variation in reporting probability of banded Greater Snow Geese (Chen caerulescens atlantica) shot by hunters in eastern North America and evaluated potential residual biases in kill rate estimation. Adult Greater Snow Geese were marked with reward (value: US$10, $20, $30, $50, and $100) and standard bands ($0, control) in the Canadian Arctic from 2003 to 2005. We used a spatially explicit multinomial model based on 200 direct recoveries from 4256 banded geese to estimate reporting rate and harvest rate. We found that reporting rate for standard bands varied over time whereas harvest rate was higher in Canada than in the U.S. The reporting probability increased from 0.40 ± 0.11 in the first year of the study to 0.82 ± 0.14 and 0.84 ± 0.13 the second and third years, respectively. Overall, these reporting rates are higher than two previous estimates for this population, which leads to lower estimates of kill rate. However, the large annual differences in reporting rates found in this study lead to uncertainty in the estimation of kill rate. We suggest that the increase in reporting rate in the last two year of the study may be due to the dissemination of information among hunters regarding the presence of reward bands on birds, resulting in increased reporting rate for all bands. This raises issues about the need to adequately inform the public in such large-scale studies to avoid undesirable temporal trends over the course of the study.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T03:23:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-37811ba43f004c04a8254754d60932be
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1712-6568
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T03:23:25Z
publishDate 2014-06-01
publisher Resilience Alliance
record_format Article
series Avian Conservation and Ecology
spelling doaj.art-37811ba43f004c04a8254754d60932be2023-01-02T08:13:56ZengResilience AllianceAvian Conservation and Ecology1712-65682014-06-0191110.5751/ACE-00628-090101628Variations in band reporting rate and implications for kill rate in Greater Snow GeeseGuillaume Souchay0Olivier Gimenez1Gilles Gauthier2Roger Pradel3Département de Biologie & Centre d'Études NordiquesCentre d'Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive - UMR 5175Département de Biologie & Centre d'Études NordiquesCentre d'Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive - UMR 5175We assessed spatial and temporal variation in reporting probability of banded Greater Snow Geese (Chen caerulescens atlantica) shot by hunters in eastern North America and evaluated potential residual biases in kill rate estimation. Adult Greater Snow Geese were marked with reward (value: US$10, $20, $30, $50, and $100) and standard bands ($0, control) in the Canadian Arctic from 2003 to 2005. We used a spatially explicit multinomial model based on 200 direct recoveries from 4256 banded geese to estimate reporting rate and harvest rate. We found that reporting rate for standard bands varied over time whereas harvest rate was higher in Canada than in the U.S. The reporting probability increased from 0.40 ± 0.11 in the first year of the study to 0.82 ± 0.14 and 0.84 ± 0.13 the second and third years, respectively. Overall, these reporting rates are higher than two previous estimates for this population, which leads to lower estimates of kill rate. However, the large annual differences in reporting rates found in this study lead to uncertainty in the estimation of kill rate. We suggest that the increase in reporting rate in the last two year of the study may be due to the dissemination of information among hunters regarding the presence of reward bands on birds, resulting in increased reporting rate for all bands. This raises issues about the need to adequately inform the public in such large-scale studies to avoid undesirable temporal trends over the course of the study.http://www.ace-eco.org/vol9/iss1/art1/Atlantic Flywayband recoveryGreater Snow Goosekill ratereporting ratereward bandspatial variationtemporal variationwaterfowl
spellingShingle Guillaume Souchay
Olivier Gimenez
Gilles Gauthier
Roger Pradel
Variations in band reporting rate and implications for kill rate in Greater Snow Geese
Avian Conservation and Ecology
Atlantic Flyway
band recovery
Greater Snow Goose
kill rate
reporting rate
reward band
spatial variation
temporal variation
waterfowl
title Variations in band reporting rate and implications for kill rate in Greater Snow Geese
title_full Variations in band reporting rate and implications for kill rate in Greater Snow Geese
title_fullStr Variations in band reporting rate and implications for kill rate in Greater Snow Geese
title_full_unstemmed Variations in band reporting rate and implications for kill rate in Greater Snow Geese
title_short Variations in band reporting rate and implications for kill rate in Greater Snow Geese
title_sort variations in band reporting rate and implications for kill rate in greater snow geese
topic Atlantic Flyway
band recovery
Greater Snow Goose
kill rate
reporting rate
reward band
spatial variation
temporal variation
waterfowl
url http://www.ace-eco.org/vol9/iss1/art1/
work_keys_str_mv AT guillaumesouchay variationsinbandreportingrateandimplicationsforkillrateingreatersnowgeese
AT oliviergimenez variationsinbandreportingrateandimplicationsforkillrateingreatersnowgeese
AT gillesgauthier variationsinbandreportingrateandimplicationsforkillrateingreatersnowgeese
AT rogerpradel variationsinbandreportingrateandimplicationsforkillrateingreatersnowgeese