Detecting Causality by Combined Use of Multiple Methods: Climate and Brain Examples.

Identifying causal relations from time series is the first step to understanding the behavior of complex systems. Although many methods have been proposed, few papers have applied multiple methods together to detect causal relations based on time series generated from coupled nonlinear systems with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yoshito Hirata, José M Amigó, Yoshiya Matsuzaka, Ryo Yokota, Hajime Mushiake, Kazuyuki Aihara
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4933387?pdf=render
_version_ 1819260364557123584
author Yoshito Hirata
José M Amigó
Yoshiya Matsuzaka
Ryo Yokota
Hajime Mushiake
Kazuyuki Aihara
author_facet Yoshito Hirata
José M Amigó
Yoshiya Matsuzaka
Ryo Yokota
Hajime Mushiake
Kazuyuki Aihara
author_sort Yoshito Hirata
collection DOAJ
description Identifying causal relations from time series is the first step to understanding the behavior of complex systems. Although many methods have been proposed, few papers have applied multiple methods together to detect causal relations based on time series generated from coupled nonlinear systems with some unobserved parts. Here we propose the combined use of three methods and a majority vote to infer causality under such circumstances. Two of these methods are proposed here for the first time, and all of the three methods can be applied even if the underlying dynamics is nonlinear and there are hidden common causes. We test our methods with coupled logistic maps, coupled Rössler models, and coupled Lorenz models. In addition, we show from ice core data how the causal relations among the temperature, the CH4 level, and the CO2 level in the atmosphere changed in the last 800,000 years, a conclusion also supported by irregularly sampled data analysis. Moreover, these methods show how three regions of the brain interact with each other during the visually cued, two-choice arm reaching task. Especially, we demonstrate that this is due to bottom up influences at the beginning of the task, while there exist mutual influences between the posterior medial prefrontal cortex and the presupplementary motor area. Based on our results, we conclude that identifying causality with an appropriate ensemble of multiple methods ensures the validity of the obtained results more firmly.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T19:24:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-378b7eeddf7f422d830158fad0c4261c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T19:24:44Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-378b7eeddf7f422d830158fad0c4261c2022-12-21T17:34:04ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01117e015857210.1371/journal.pone.0158572Detecting Causality by Combined Use of Multiple Methods: Climate and Brain Examples.Yoshito HirataJosé M AmigóYoshiya MatsuzakaRyo YokotaHajime MushiakeKazuyuki AiharaIdentifying causal relations from time series is the first step to understanding the behavior of complex systems. Although many methods have been proposed, few papers have applied multiple methods together to detect causal relations based on time series generated from coupled nonlinear systems with some unobserved parts. Here we propose the combined use of three methods and a majority vote to infer causality under such circumstances. Two of these methods are proposed here for the first time, and all of the three methods can be applied even if the underlying dynamics is nonlinear and there are hidden common causes. We test our methods with coupled logistic maps, coupled Rössler models, and coupled Lorenz models. In addition, we show from ice core data how the causal relations among the temperature, the CH4 level, and the CO2 level in the atmosphere changed in the last 800,000 years, a conclusion also supported by irregularly sampled data analysis. Moreover, these methods show how three regions of the brain interact with each other during the visually cued, two-choice arm reaching task. Especially, we demonstrate that this is due to bottom up influences at the beginning of the task, while there exist mutual influences between the posterior medial prefrontal cortex and the presupplementary motor area. Based on our results, we conclude that identifying causality with an appropriate ensemble of multiple methods ensures the validity of the obtained results more firmly.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4933387?pdf=render
spellingShingle Yoshito Hirata
José M Amigó
Yoshiya Matsuzaka
Ryo Yokota
Hajime Mushiake
Kazuyuki Aihara
Detecting Causality by Combined Use of Multiple Methods: Climate and Brain Examples.
PLoS ONE
title Detecting Causality by Combined Use of Multiple Methods: Climate and Brain Examples.
title_full Detecting Causality by Combined Use of Multiple Methods: Climate and Brain Examples.
title_fullStr Detecting Causality by Combined Use of Multiple Methods: Climate and Brain Examples.
title_full_unstemmed Detecting Causality by Combined Use of Multiple Methods: Climate and Brain Examples.
title_short Detecting Causality by Combined Use of Multiple Methods: Climate and Brain Examples.
title_sort detecting causality by combined use of multiple methods climate and brain examples
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4933387?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT yoshitohirata detectingcausalitybycombineduseofmultiplemethodsclimateandbrainexamples
AT josemamigo detectingcausalitybycombineduseofmultiplemethodsclimateandbrainexamples
AT yoshiyamatsuzaka detectingcausalitybycombineduseofmultiplemethodsclimateandbrainexamples
AT ryoyokota detectingcausalitybycombineduseofmultiplemethodsclimateandbrainexamples
AT hajimemushiake detectingcausalitybycombineduseofmultiplemethodsclimateandbrainexamples
AT kazuyukiaihara detectingcausalitybycombineduseofmultiplemethodsclimateandbrainexamples