Assessment on the energy flow and carbon emissions of integrated steelmaking plants

China’s iron and steel industry has developed rapidly over the past two decades. The annual crude steel production is nearly half of the global production, and approximately 90% of the steel is produced via BF–BOF route that is energy-intensive. Based on the practice of integrated steelmaking plants...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huachun He, Hongjun Guan, Xiang Zhu, Haiyu Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-11-01
Series:Energy Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484717300033
_version_ 1818449294098694144
author Huachun He
Hongjun Guan
Xiang Zhu
Haiyu Lee
author_facet Huachun He
Hongjun Guan
Xiang Zhu
Haiyu Lee
author_sort Huachun He
collection DOAJ
description China’s iron and steel industry has developed rapidly over the past two decades. The annual crude steel production is nearly half of the global production, and approximately 90% of the steel is produced via BF–BOF route that is energy-intensive. Based on the practice of integrated steelmaking plants, a material flow analysis model that includes three layers, i.e., material, ferrum, and energy, was constructed on process levels to analyze the energy consumption and carbon emissions according to the principle of mass conservation and the First Law of Thermodynamics. The result shows that the primary energy intensity and carbon emissions are 20.3 GJ/t and 0.46 tC/t crude steel, respectively, including coke and ancillary material’s preparation. These values are above the world’s average level of the BF–BOF route and could be regarded as a high-performance benchmark of steelmaking efficiency. However, the total energy consumption and carbon emission from steelmaking industry were approximately 13095 PJ and 300 MtC, respectively, on the best practice estimation in 2011, and are still large numbers for achieving the goal of reducing global warming. The potential carbon reduction will be limited if no significant changes are undertaken in the steel industry.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T20:33:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-37b1a6f1ede643e48afc445f57f57e4b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-4847
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T20:33:07Z
publishDate 2017-11-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Energy Reports
spelling doaj.art-37b1a6f1ede643e48afc445f57f57e4b2022-12-21T22:48:28ZengElsevierEnergy Reports2352-48472017-11-013C293610.1016/j.egyr.2017.01.001Assessment on the energy flow and carbon emissions of integrated steelmaking plantsHuachun He0Hongjun Guan1Xiang Zhu2Haiyu Lee3School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210046, ChinaEngineering Institute of Engineering Corps, PLA University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 21007, ChinaYunnan Environment Monitoring Centre, Yunnan Provincial Environmental Protection Department, Kunming 650034, ChinaSchool of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210046, ChinaChina’s iron and steel industry has developed rapidly over the past two decades. The annual crude steel production is nearly half of the global production, and approximately 90% of the steel is produced via BF–BOF route that is energy-intensive. Based on the practice of integrated steelmaking plants, a material flow analysis model that includes three layers, i.e., material, ferrum, and energy, was constructed on process levels to analyze the energy consumption and carbon emissions according to the principle of mass conservation and the First Law of Thermodynamics. The result shows that the primary energy intensity and carbon emissions are 20.3 GJ/t and 0.46 tC/t crude steel, respectively, including coke and ancillary material’s preparation. These values are above the world’s average level of the BF–BOF route and could be regarded as a high-performance benchmark of steelmaking efficiency. However, the total energy consumption and carbon emission from steelmaking industry were approximately 13095 PJ and 300 MtC, respectively, on the best practice estimation in 2011, and are still large numbers for achieving the goal of reducing global warming. The potential carbon reduction will be limited if no significant changes are undertaken in the steel industry.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484717300033Iron and steelEnergy flowMaterial flowCarbon emissionEnergy efficiency
spellingShingle Huachun He
Hongjun Guan
Xiang Zhu
Haiyu Lee
Assessment on the energy flow and carbon emissions of integrated steelmaking plants
Energy Reports
Iron and steel
Energy flow
Material flow
Carbon emission
Energy efficiency
title Assessment on the energy flow and carbon emissions of integrated steelmaking plants
title_full Assessment on the energy flow and carbon emissions of integrated steelmaking plants
title_fullStr Assessment on the energy flow and carbon emissions of integrated steelmaking plants
title_full_unstemmed Assessment on the energy flow and carbon emissions of integrated steelmaking plants
title_short Assessment on the energy flow and carbon emissions of integrated steelmaking plants
title_sort assessment on the energy flow and carbon emissions of integrated steelmaking plants
topic Iron and steel
Energy flow
Material flow
Carbon emission
Energy efficiency
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484717300033
work_keys_str_mv AT huachunhe assessmentontheenergyflowandcarbonemissionsofintegratedsteelmakingplants
AT hongjunguan assessmentontheenergyflowandcarbonemissionsofintegratedsteelmakingplants
AT xiangzhu assessmentontheenergyflowandcarbonemissionsofintegratedsteelmakingplants
AT haiyulee assessmentontheenergyflowandcarbonemissionsofintegratedsteelmakingplants