Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Different Types of CAD/CAM Blocks

Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the cytotoxic effects of Computer Aided Design (CAD) and Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAM) blocks produced by different companies on human peripheral blood lymphocytes by MTT assay. Methods: Six different CAD/CAM materials were investigated: feldspar ceram...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fikret Özgür Coşkun, Semanur Özüdoğru, Mustafa Hayati Atala, Giray Buğra Akbaba
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Selçuk University 2023-08-01
Series:Selcuk Dental Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2749464
_version_ 1797628224495157248
author Fikret Özgür Coşkun
Semanur Özüdoğru
Mustafa Hayati Atala
Giray Buğra Akbaba
author_facet Fikret Özgür Coşkun
Semanur Özüdoğru
Mustafa Hayati Atala
Giray Buğra Akbaba
author_sort Fikret Özgür Coşkun
collection DOAJ
description Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the cytotoxic effects of Computer Aided Design (CAD) and Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAM) blocks produced by different companies on human peripheral blood lymphocytes by MTT assay. Methods: Six different CAD/CAM materials were investigated: feldspar ceramic VM (Vitablocks Mark II ), resin nano-ceramic LU (Lava Ultimate), hybrid ceramic C (Cerasmart), leucite-reinforced ceramic LRF (GC LRF), zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic VS (Vita Suprinity), polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network VE (Vita Enamic). A total of 36 disc-shaped samples (Ø: 5 mm; h: 2 mm) were prepared from commercial blanks and blocks. Cell proliferation and cytotoxicity were assessed at 24h and 48h using MTT assay. The data were statistically evaluated with the Two-way ANOVA test (p < 0.05). Results: MTT viability data at 24 h showed that group VM and LU blocks were mildly cytotoxic, but there was no statistically significant difference when compared with other groups (p>0.05). It was determined that all blocks caused cell proliferation after 48 hours of exposure (p>0.05). It has been shown that all blocks whose cytotoxic effects were investigated did not cause any toxic effects (except VM and LU for 24 h) at different application times (24 h and 48 h). Conclusion: Based on the results obtained and the limitations of the current in vitro study, the tested materials were not cytotoxic. Only VM and LU caused negligible cytotoxicity at 24-hour exposure.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T10:36:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-37b569b604994f58a660b252fa01bc83
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2148-7529
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T10:36:18Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Selçuk University
record_format Article
series Selcuk Dental Journal
spelling doaj.art-37b569b604994f58a660b252fa01bc832023-11-14T11:05:05ZengSelçuk UniversitySelcuk Dental Journal2148-75292023-08-0110246246710.15311/selcukdentj.1199010154Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Different Types of CAD/CAM BlocksFikret Özgür Coşkun0Semanur Özüdoğru1Mustafa Hayati Atala2Giray Buğra Akbaba3KAFKAS ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİKAFKAS UNIVERSITYISTANBUL MEDENIYET UNIVERSITYKAFKAS UNIVERSITYAim: The aim of this study is to determine the cytotoxic effects of Computer Aided Design (CAD) and Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAM) blocks produced by different companies on human peripheral blood lymphocytes by MTT assay. Methods: Six different CAD/CAM materials were investigated: feldspar ceramic VM (Vitablocks Mark II ), resin nano-ceramic LU (Lava Ultimate), hybrid ceramic C (Cerasmart), leucite-reinforced ceramic LRF (GC LRF), zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic VS (Vita Suprinity), polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network VE (Vita Enamic). A total of 36 disc-shaped samples (Ø: 5 mm; h: 2 mm) were prepared from commercial blanks and blocks. Cell proliferation and cytotoxicity were assessed at 24h and 48h using MTT assay. The data were statistically evaluated with the Two-way ANOVA test (p < 0.05). Results: MTT viability data at 24 h showed that group VM and LU blocks were mildly cytotoxic, but there was no statistically significant difference when compared with other groups (p>0.05). It was determined that all blocks caused cell proliferation after 48 hours of exposure (p>0.05). It has been shown that all blocks whose cytotoxic effects were investigated did not cause any toxic effects (except VM and LU for 24 h) at different application times (24 h and 48 h). Conclusion: Based on the results obtained and the limitations of the current in vitro study, the tested materials were not cytotoxic. Only VM and LU caused negligible cytotoxicity at 24-hour exposure.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2749464insan periferik lenfositlerisitotoksisitecad/cam bloklarıhuman peripheral lymphocytescytotoxicitycad/cam blocks
spellingShingle Fikret Özgür Coşkun
Semanur Özüdoğru
Mustafa Hayati Atala
Giray Buğra Akbaba
Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Different Types of CAD/CAM Blocks
Selcuk Dental Journal
insan periferik lenfositleri
sitotoksisite
cad/cam blokları
human peripheral lymphocytes
cytotoxicity
cad/cam blocks
title Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Different Types of CAD/CAM Blocks
title_full Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Different Types of CAD/CAM Blocks
title_fullStr Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Different Types of CAD/CAM Blocks
title_full_unstemmed Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Different Types of CAD/CAM Blocks
title_short Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Different Types of CAD/CAM Blocks
title_sort cytotoxicity evaluation of different types of cad cam blocks
topic insan periferik lenfositleri
sitotoksisite
cad/cam blokları
human peripheral lymphocytes
cytotoxicity
cad/cam blocks
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2749464
work_keys_str_mv AT fikretozgurcoskun cytotoxicityevaluationofdifferenttypesofcadcamblocks
AT semanurozudogru cytotoxicityevaluationofdifferenttypesofcadcamblocks
AT mustafahayatiatala cytotoxicityevaluationofdifferenttypesofcadcamblocks
AT giraybugraakbaba cytotoxicityevaluationofdifferenttypesofcadcamblocks