Joining the clash or refusing to bash? Bystanders reactions to online celebrity bashing

Researchers, in studies of online news-site commenting, have found a huge number of aggressive comments and have indicated that such comments should be interpreted within the discussion context that other bystanders, such as journalists and other readers, have created. In this study, we aimed to off...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gaëlle Ouvrein, Charlotte J.S. De Backer, Heidi Vandebosch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Masaryk University 2018-12-01
Series:Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberpspace
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/11420
_version_ 1797248131878879232
author Gaëlle Ouvrein
Charlotte J.S. De Backer
Heidi Vandebosch
author_facet Gaëlle Ouvrein
Charlotte J.S. De Backer
Heidi Vandebosch
author_sort Gaëlle Ouvrein
collection DOAJ
description Researchers, in studies of online news-site commenting, have found a huge number of aggressive comments and have indicated that such comments should be interpreted within the discussion context that other bystanders, such as journalists and other readers, have created. In this study, we aimed to offer insights into bystanders’ reactions to negative news articles and other bystanders’ aggressive comments in the specific context of celebrity news. Therefore, we subjected Flemish celebrity-news articles (N = 69) and the Facebook reactions (N = 5,529) to those articles to a content analysis. First, using a quantitative content analysis, we coded each comment as having a negative, neutral, or positive tone. Next, we conducted a qualitative content analysis, which consisted of a vertical coding phase and a horizontal coding phase, so as to investigate the comments’ content in more depth and to determine which elements resulted in some comments’ negative and even aggressive tone. The results indicate that most readers’ reactions stayed on topic, thus merely contributing to the negative atmosphere that the journalist had already created. However, unlike the journalists, who tended to express their emotions rather subtly, the readers reacted using extreme aggressive language. Furthermore, although these aggressive reader reactions generally seemed to set an aggressive tone for future reactions, some readers broke this aggressive cycle and explicitly disapproved of the aggressive expressions.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T20:09:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-37b99cb7c3b54ef68a3848d5a53575ee
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1802-7962
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T20:09:43Z
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher Masaryk University
record_format Article
series Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberpspace
spelling doaj.art-37b99cb7c3b54ef68a3848d5a53575ee2024-03-23T13:14:40ZengMasaryk UniversityCyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberpspace1802-79622018-12-0112410.5817/CP2018-4-5Joining the clash or refusing to bash? Bystanders reactions to online celebrity bashingGaëlle OuvreinCharlotte J.S. De BackerHeidi VandeboschResearchers, in studies of online news-site commenting, have found a huge number of aggressive comments and have indicated that such comments should be interpreted within the discussion context that other bystanders, such as journalists and other readers, have created. In this study, we aimed to offer insights into bystanders’ reactions to negative news articles and other bystanders’ aggressive comments in the specific context of celebrity news. Therefore, we subjected Flemish celebrity-news articles (N = 69) and the Facebook reactions (N = 5,529) to those articles to a content analysis. First, using a quantitative content analysis, we coded each comment as having a negative, neutral, or positive tone. Next, we conducted a qualitative content analysis, which consisted of a vertical coding phase and a horizontal coding phase, so as to investigate the comments’ content in more depth and to determine which elements resulted in some comments’ negative and even aggressive tone. The results indicate that most readers’ reactions stayed on topic, thus merely contributing to the negative atmosphere that the journalist had already created. However, unlike the journalists, who tended to express their emotions rather subtly, the readers reacted using extreme aggressive language. Furthermore, although these aggressive reader reactions generally seemed to set an aggressive tone for future reactions, some readers broke this aggressive cycle and explicitly disapproved of the aggressive expressions.https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/11420Celebrity bashingbystandersuser commentsonline aggressionFacebook
spellingShingle Gaëlle Ouvrein
Charlotte J.S. De Backer
Heidi Vandebosch
Joining the clash or refusing to bash? Bystanders reactions to online celebrity bashing
Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberpspace
Celebrity bashing
bystanders
user comments
online aggression
Facebook
title Joining the clash or refusing to bash? Bystanders reactions to online celebrity bashing
title_full Joining the clash or refusing to bash? Bystanders reactions to online celebrity bashing
title_fullStr Joining the clash or refusing to bash? Bystanders reactions to online celebrity bashing
title_full_unstemmed Joining the clash or refusing to bash? Bystanders reactions to online celebrity bashing
title_short Joining the clash or refusing to bash? Bystanders reactions to online celebrity bashing
title_sort joining the clash or refusing to bash bystanders reactions to online celebrity bashing
topic Celebrity bashing
bystanders
user comments
online aggression
Facebook
url https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/11420
work_keys_str_mv AT gaelleouvrein joiningtheclashorrefusingtobashbystandersreactionstoonlinecelebritybashing
AT charlottejsdebacker joiningtheclashorrefusingtobashbystandersreactionstoonlinecelebritybashing
AT heidivandebosch joiningtheclashorrefusingtobashbystandersreactionstoonlinecelebritybashing