Modelling the cost of place of birth: a pathway analysis

Abstract Background In New South Wales (NSW), Australia there are three settings available for women at low risk of complications to give birth: home, birth centre and hospital. Between 2000 and 2012, 93.6% of babies were planned to be born in hospital, 6.0% in a birth centre and 0.4% at home. Avail...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vanessa L. Scarf, Serena Yu, Rosalie Viney, Seong Leang Cheah, Hannah Dahlen, David Sibbritt, Charlene Thornton, Sally Tracy, Caroline Homer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-08-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06810-9
_version_ 1819094711215849472
author Vanessa L. Scarf
Serena Yu
Rosalie Viney
Seong Leang Cheah
Hannah Dahlen
David Sibbritt
Charlene Thornton
Sally Tracy
Caroline Homer
author_facet Vanessa L. Scarf
Serena Yu
Rosalie Viney
Seong Leang Cheah
Hannah Dahlen
David Sibbritt
Charlene Thornton
Sally Tracy
Caroline Homer
author_sort Vanessa L. Scarf
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background In New South Wales (NSW), Australia there are three settings available for women at low risk of complications to give birth: home, birth centre and hospital. Between 2000 and 2012, 93.6% of babies were planned to be born in hospital, 6.0% in a birth centre and 0.4% at home. Availability of alternative birth settings is limited and the cost of providing birth at home or in a birth centre from the perspective of the health system is unknown. Objectives The objective of this study was to model the cost of the trajectories of women who planned to give birth at home, in a birth centre or in a hospital from the public sector perspective. Methods This was a population-based study using linked datasets from NSW, Australia. Women included met the following selection criteria: 37-41 completed weeks of pregnancy, spontaneous onset of labour, and singleton pregnancy at low risk of complications. We used a decision tree framework to depict the trajectories of these women and Australian Refined-Diagnosis Related Groups (AR-DRGs) were applied to each trajectory to estimate the cost of birth. A scenario analysis was undertaken to model the cost for 30 000 women in one year. Findings 496 387 women were included in the dataset. Twelve potential outcome pathways were identified and each pathway was costed using AR-DRGs. An overall cost was also calculated by place of birth: $AUD4802 for homebirth, $AUD4979 for a birth centre birth and $AUD5463 for a hospital birth. Conclusion The findings from this study provides some clarity into the financial saving of offering more options to women seeking an alternative to giving birth in hospital. Given the relatively lower rates of complex intervention and neonatal outcomes associated with women at low risk of complications, we can assume the cost of providing them with homebirth and birth centre options could be cost-effective.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T23:31:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-37bc80f68360460fbf58784a73de5c73
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T23:31:45Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-37bc80f68360460fbf58784a73de5c732022-12-21T18:46:28ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632021-08-0121111110.1186/s12913-021-06810-9Modelling the cost of place of birth: a pathway analysisVanessa L. Scarf0Serena Yu1Rosalie Viney2Seong Leang Cheah3Hannah Dahlen4David Sibbritt5Charlene Thornton6Sally Tracy7Caroline Homer8Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology SydneyCentre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology SydneyCentre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology SydneyCentre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology SydneySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney UniversityCentre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology SydneyUniversity of SydneyCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders UniversityCentre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology SydneyAbstract Background In New South Wales (NSW), Australia there are three settings available for women at low risk of complications to give birth: home, birth centre and hospital. Between 2000 and 2012, 93.6% of babies were planned to be born in hospital, 6.0% in a birth centre and 0.4% at home. Availability of alternative birth settings is limited and the cost of providing birth at home or in a birth centre from the perspective of the health system is unknown. Objectives The objective of this study was to model the cost of the trajectories of women who planned to give birth at home, in a birth centre or in a hospital from the public sector perspective. Methods This was a population-based study using linked datasets from NSW, Australia. Women included met the following selection criteria: 37-41 completed weeks of pregnancy, spontaneous onset of labour, and singleton pregnancy at low risk of complications. We used a decision tree framework to depict the trajectories of these women and Australian Refined-Diagnosis Related Groups (AR-DRGs) were applied to each trajectory to estimate the cost of birth. A scenario analysis was undertaken to model the cost for 30 000 women in one year. Findings 496 387 women were included in the dataset. Twelve potential outcome pathways were identified and each pathway was costed using AR-DRGs. An overall cost was also calculated by place of birth: $AUD4802 for homebirth, $AUD4979 for a birth centre birth and $AUD5463 for a hospital birth. Conclusion The findings from this study provides some clarity into the financial saving of offering more options to women seeking an alternative to giving birth in hospital. Given the relatively lower rates of complex intervention and neonatal outcomes associated with women at low risk of complications, we can assume the cost of providing them with homebirth and birth centre options could be cost-effective.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06810-9Economic analysisChildbirthCostHomebirthBirth centreDecision tree
spellingShingle Vanessa L. Scarf
Serena Yu
Rosalie Viney
Seong Leang Cheah
Hannah Dahlen
David Sibbritt
Charlene Thornton
Sally Tracy
Caroline Homer
Modelling the cost of place of birth: a pathway analysis
BMC Health Services Research
Economic analysis
Childbirth
Cost
Homebirth
Birth centre
Decision tree
title Modelling the cost of place of birth: a pathway analysis
title_full Modelling the cost of place of birth: a pathway analysis
title_fullStr Modelling the cost of place of birth: a pathway analysis
title_full_unstemmed Modelling the cost of place of birth: a pathway analysis
title_short Modelling the cost of place of birth: a pathway analysis
title_sort modelling the cost of place of birth a pathway analysis
topic Economic analysis
Childbirth
Cost
Homebirth
Birth centre
Decision tree
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06810-9
work_keys_str_mv AT vanessalscarf modellingthecostofplaceofbirthapathwayanalysis
AT serenayu modellingthecostofplaceofbirthapathwayanalysis
AT rosalieviney modellingthecostofplaceofbirthapathwayanalysis
AT seongleangcheah modellingthecostofplaceofbirthapathwayanalysis
AT hannahdahlen modellingthecostofplaceofbirthapathwayanalysis
AT davidsibbritt modellingthecostofplaceofbirthapathwayanalysis
AT charlenethornton modellingthecostofplaceofbirthapathwayanalysis
AT sallytracy modellingthecostofplaceofbirthapathwayanalysis
AT carolinehomer modellingthecostofplaceofbirthapathwayanalysis