Systematic review and comparative analysis of pediatric nutrition screening tools validated in Europe and Canada

Introduction: Nutritional screening is a useful tool for determining the risk of hospital malnutrition; therefore, reviewing the guidelines on its use in the pediatric population is of great importance. Objective: To provide recommendations on the use of nutrition screening tools validated in Cana...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura Vásquez-Cárdenas, Olga Lucia Pinzón-Espitia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad Nacional de Colombia 2020-01-01
Series:Revista de la Facultad de Medicina
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/revfacmed/article/view/73180
_version_ 1797824896191954944
author Laura Vásquez-Cárdenas
Olga Lucia Pinzón-Espitia
author_facet Laura Vásquez-Cárdenas
Olga Lucia Pinzón-Espitia
author_sort Laura Vásquez-Cárdenas
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Nutritional screening is a useful tool for determining the risk of hospital malnutrition; therefore, reviewing the guidelines on its use in the pediatric population is of great importance. Objective: To provide recommendations on the use of nutrition screening tools validated in Canada and Europe in the Colombian pediatric population. Materials and method: A systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA methodology. The quality of the evidence found in the review was assessed using the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) tool, which was established by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination for assessing preventive actions. Results: Fifteen studies were included in the review as they met the inclusion criteria. In addition, 7 nutrition screening tools were identified (PYMS, iPYMS, PeDiSMART, PNR, STAMP, PMST and STRONGkids). According to guidelines of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, the PYMS, iPYMS and STRONGkids tools simultaneously assess prognostic variables such as current nutritional status, stability, expected improvement or worsening of the condition, and the influence of the disease process in nutritional deterioration. Regarding concurrent validity, data analysis shows that PYMS, iPYMS and PMST have sensitivities >85%, and that PYMS has a specificity >85%. In terms of reproducibility, PEDISMART, STRONGkids, STAMP and PYMS have an acceptable interobserver agreement (k> 0.41). Conclusion: Based on the evidence found, which was analyzed in terms of prognostic variables, concurrent validity and reproducibility, the use of the PYMS tool in the clinical practice is suggested. In contrast, hospitals must assess the applicability of the STAMP and iPYMS tools. 
first_indexed 2024-03-13T10:46:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-37c7767972f74c649edb6241bdf86f5f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0120-0011
2357-3848
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T10:46:06Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Universidad Nacional de Colombia
record_format Article
series Revista de la Facultad de Medicina
spelling doaj.art-37c7767972f74c649edb6241bdf86f5f2023-05-17T17:12:06ZengUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaRevista de la Facultad de Medicina0120-00112357-38482020-01-0168110.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.73180Systematic review and comparative analysis of pediatric nutrition screening tools validated in Europe and CanadaLaura Vásquez-Cárdenas0Olga Lucia Pinzón-Espitia1Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Bogotá Campus - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Human Nutrition - Bogotá D.C. - ColombiaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Bogotá Campus - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Human Nutrition - Bogotá D.C. - Colombia | 2. Hospital Universitario Mayor-Méderi – Nutrition Service - Bogotá D.C. - Colombia Introduction: Nutritional screening is a useful tool for determining the risk of hospital malnutrition; therefore, reviewing the guidelines on its use in the pediatric population is of great importance. Objective: To provide recommendations on the use of nutrition screening tools validated in Canada and Europe in the Colombian pediatric population. Materials and method: A systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA methodology. The quality of the evidence found in the review was assessed using the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) tool, which was established by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination for assessing preventive actions. Results: Fifteen studies were included in the review as they met the inclusion criteria. In addition, 7 nutrition screening tools were identified (PYMS, iPYMS, PeDiSMART, PNR, STAMP, PMST and STRONGkids). According to guidelines of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, the PYMS, iPYMS and STRONGkids tools simultaneously assess prognostic variables such as current nutritional status, stability, expected improvement or worsening of the condition, and the influence of the disease process in nutritional deterioration. Regarding concurrent validity, data analysis shows that PYMS, iPYMS and PMST have sensitivities >85%, and that PYMS has a specificity >85%. In terms of reproducibility, PEDISMART, STRONGkids, STAMP and PYMS have an acceptable interobserver agreement (k> 0.41). Conclusion: Based on the evidence found, which was analyzed in terms of prognostic variables, concurrent validity and reproducibility, the use of the PYMS tool in the clinical practice is suggested. In contrast, hospitals must assess the applicability of the STAMP and iPYMS tools.  https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/revfacmed/article/view/73180ReviewMass ScreeningMalnutritionPediatricsHospitals
spellingShingle Laura Vásquez-Cárdenas
Olga Lucia Pinzón-Espitia
Systematic review and comparative analysis of pediatric nutrition screening tools validated in Europe and Canada
Revista de la Facultad de Medicina
Review
Mass Screening
Malnutrition
Pediatrics
Hospitals
title Systematic review and comparative analysis of pediatric nutrition screening tools validated in Europe and Canada
title_full Systematic review and comparative analysis of pediatric nutrition screening tools validated in Europe and Canada
title_fullStr Systematic review and comparative analysis of pediatric nutrition screening tools validated in Europe and Canada
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review and comparative analysis of pediatric nutrition screening tools validated in Europe and Canada
title_short Systematic review and comparative analysis of pediatric nutrition screening tools validated in Europe and Canada
title_sort systematic review and comparative analysis of pediatric nutrition screening tools validated in europe and canada
topic Review
Mass Screening
Malnutrition
Pediatrics
Hospitals
url https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/revfacmed/article/view/73180
work_keys_str_mv AT lauravasquezcardenas systematicreviewandcomparativeanalysisofpediatricnutritionscreeningtoolsvalidatedineuropeandcanada
AT olgaluciapinzonespitia systematicreviewandcomparativeanalysisofpediatricnutritionscreeningtoolsvalidatedineuropeandcanada