Full-Density Fused Deposition Modeling Dimensional Error as a Function of Raster Angle and Build Orientation: Large Dataset for Eleven Materials

This paper describes the collection of a large dataset (6930 measurements) on dimensional error in the fused deposition modeling (FDM) additive manufacturing process for full-density parts. Three different print orientations were studied, as well as seven raster angles ( 0 ∘ , 15 ∘ ,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sherri L. Messimer, Tais Rocha Pereira, Albert E. Patterson, Maliha Lubna, Fabiano O. Drozda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2504-4494/3/1/6
_version_ 1819295834224721920
author Sherri L. Messimer
Tais Rocha Pereira
Albert E. Patterson
Maliha Lubna
Fabiano O. Drozda
author_facet Sherri L. Messimer
Tais Rocha Pereira
Albert E. Patterson
Maliha Lubna
Fabiano O. Drozda
author_sort Sherri L. Messimer
collection DOAJ
description This paper describes the collection of a large dataset (6930 measurements) on dimensional error in the fused deposition modeling (FDM) additive manufacturing process for full-density parts. Three different print orientations were studied, as well as seven raster angles ( 0 ∘ , 15 ∘ , 30 ∘ , 45 ∘ , 60 ∘ , 75 ∘ , and 90 ∘ ) for the rectilinear infill pattern. All measurements were replicated ten times on ten different samples to ensure a comprehensive dataset. Eleven polymer materials were considered: acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polylactic acid (PLA), high-temperature PLA, wood-composite PLA, carbon-fiber-composite PLA, copper-composite PLA, aluminum-composite PLA, high-impact polystyrene (HIPS), polyethylene terephthalate glycol-enhanced (PETG), polycarbonate, and synthetic polyamide (nylon). The samples were ASTM-standard impact-testing samples, since this geometry allows the measurement of error on three different scales; the nominal dimensions were 3 . 25 mm thick, 63 . 5 mm long, and 12 . 7 mm wide. This dataset is intended to give engineers and product designers a basis for judging the accuracy and repeatability of the FDM process for use in manufacturing of end-user products.
first_indexed 2024-12-24T04:48:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-37c8a22ce57c4ec287487e0d66e50f20
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2504-4494
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-24T04:48:31Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
spelling doaj.art-37c8a22ce57c4ec287487e0d66e50f202022-12-21T17:14:37ZengMDPI AGJournal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing2504-44942019-01-0131610.3390/jmmp3010006jmmp3010006Full-Density Fused Deposition Modeling Dimensional Error as a Function of Raster Angle and Build Orientation: Large Dataset for Eleven MaterialsSherri L. Messimer0Tais Rocha Pereira1Albert E. Patterson2Maliha Lubna3Fabiano O. Drozda4Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Technology Hall N143, 300 Sparkman Drive, Huntsville, AL 35899, USADepartment of Industrial & Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Technology Hall N143, 300 Sparkman Drive, Huntsville, AL 35899, USADepartment of Industrial & Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Technology Hall N143, 300 Sparkman Drive, Huntsville, AL 35899, USADepartment of Industrial & Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Technology Hall N143, 300 Sparkman Drive, Huntsville, AL 35899, USADepartment of Production Engineering, Federal University of Paraná, Rue XV de Novembro, 1299-Centro, Curitiba 80060-000, BrazilThis paper describes the collection of a large dataset (6930 measurements) on dimensional error in the fused deposition modeling (FDM) additive manufacturing process for full-density parts. Three different print orientations were studied, as well as seven raster angles ( 0 ∘ , 15 ∘ , 30 ∘ , 45 ∘ , 60 ∘ , 75 ∘ , and 90 ∘ ) for the rectilinear infill pattern. All measurements were replicated ten times on ten different samples to ensure a comprehensive dataset. Eleven polymer materials were considered: acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polylactic acid (PLA), high-temperature PLA, wood-composite PLA, carbon-fiber-composite PLA, copper-composite PLA, aluminum-composite PLA, high-impact polystyrene (HIPS), polyethylene terephthalate glycol-enhanced (PETG), polycarbonate, and synthetic polyamide (nylon). The samples were ASTM-standard impact-testing samples, since this geometry allows the measurement of error on three different scales; the nominal dimensions were 3 . 25 mm thick, 63 . 5 mm long, and 12 . 7 mm wide. This dataset is intended to give engineers and product designers a basis for judging the accuracy and repeatability of the FDM process for use in manufacturing of end-user products.http://www.mdpi.com/2504-4494/3/1/6additive manufacturingfused deposition modelingFDMdimensional accuracymanufacturing process repeatabilitypolymer testing
spellingShingle Sherri L. Messimer
Tais Rocha Pereira
Albert E. Patterson
Maliha Lubna
Fabiano O. Drozda
Full-Density Fused Deposition Modeling Dimensional Error as a Function of Raster Angle and Build Orientation: Large Dataset for Eleven Materials
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
additive manufacturing
fused deposition modeling
FDM
dimensional accuracy
manufacturing process repeatability
polymer testing
title Full-Density Fused Deposition Modeling Dimensional Error as a Function of Raster Angle and Build Orientation: Large Dataset for Eleven Materials
title_full Full-Density Fused Deposition Modeling Dimensional Error as a Function of Raster Angle and Build Orientation: Large Dataset for Eleven Materials
title_fullStr Full-Density Fused Deposition Modeling Dimensional Error as a Function of Raster Angle and Build Orientation: Large Dataset for Eleven Materials
title_full_unstemmed Full-Density Fused Deposition Modeling Dimensional Error as a Function of Raster Angle and Build Orientation: Large Dataset for Eleven Materials
title_short Full-Density Fused Deposition Modeling Dimensional Error as a Function of Raster Angle and Build Orientation: Large Dataset for Eleven Materials
title_sort full density fused deposition modeling dimensional error as a function of raster angle and build orientation large dataset for eleven materials
topic additive manufacturing
fused deposition modeling
FDM
dimensional accuracy
manufacturing process repeatability
polymer testing
url http://www.mdpi.com/2504-4494/3/1/6
work_keys_str_mv AT sherrilmessimer fulldensityfuseddepositionmodelingdimensionalerrorasafunctionofrasterangleandbuildorientationlargedatasetforelevenmaterials
AT taisrochapereira fulldensityfuseddepositionmodelingdimensionalerrorasafunctionofrasterangleandbuildorientationlargedatasetforelevenmaterials
AT albertepatterson fulldensityfuseddepositionmodelingdimensionalerrorasafunctionofrasterangleandbuildorientationlargedatasetforelevenmaterials
AT malihalubna fulldensityfuseddepositionmodelingdimensionalerrorasafunctionofrasterangleandbuildorientationlargedatasetforelevenmaterials
AT fabianoodrozda fulldensityfuseddepositionmodelingdimensionalerrorasafunctionofrasterangleandbuildorientationlargedatasetforelevenmaterials