Cardiac resynchronization considerations in left bundle branch block

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via biventricular pacing (BiVP) is an established treatment for patients with left ventricular systolic heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay resulting in wide QRS. Seminal trials demonstrating mortality benefit from CRT were conducted in patient...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nathan W. Kong, Gaurav A. Upadhyay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Physiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2022.962042/full
_version_ 1798033834838589440
author Nathan W. Kong
Gaurav A. Upadhyay
author_facet Nathan W. Kong
Gaurav A. Upadhyay
author_sort Nathan W. Kong
collection DOAJ
description Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via biventricular pacing (BiVP) is an established treatment for patients with left ventricular systolic heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay resulting in wide QRS. Seminal trials demonstrating mortality benefit from CRT were conducted in patients with wide left bundle branch block (LBBB) pattern on electrocardiogram (ECG) and evidence of clinical heart failure. The presence of conduction block was assumed to correlate with commonly applied criteria for LBBB. More recent data has challenged this assertion, revealing that LBBB pattern may include distinct underlying pathophysiology, including patients with complete conduction block, either at the left-sided His fibers or the proximal left bundle, intact Purkinje activation with wide LBBB-like QRS, and patients demonstrating both proximal block and distal delay. Currently, BiVP-CRT is indicated for all QRS duration ≥150 ms and may be considered for BBB patterns from 130 to 149 ms with robust clinical data to support its use. Despite this, however, there remains a significant number of non-responders to BVP. Conduction system pacing (CSP) has emerged as an alternative approach to deliver CRT and correct QRS in patients with conduction block. Newer hybrid approaches which combine CSP and traditional BiVP-CRT and may hold promise for patients with IP or mixed-level block. As various approaches to CRT continue to be studied, physiologic phenotyping of the LBBB pattern remains an important consideration.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T20:35:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-37d09606da104ab6a4e2a6cec2914855
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-042X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T20:35:52Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Physiology
spelling doaj.art-37d09606da104ab6a4e2a6cec29148552022-12-22T04:04:22ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2022-09-011310.3389/fphys.2022.962042962042Cardiac resynchronization considerations in left bundle branch blockNathan W. Kong0Gaurav A. Upadhyay1Department of Internal Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, United StatesSection of Cardiology, Center for Arrhythmia Care, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, United StatesCardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via biventricular pacing (BiVP) is an established treatment for patients with left ventricular systolic heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay resulting in wide QRS. Seminal trials demonstrating mortality benefit from CRT were conducted in patients with wide left bundle branch block (LBBB) pattern on electrocardiogram (ECG) and evidence of clinical heart failure. The presence of conduction block was assumed to correlate with commonly applied criteria for LBBB. More recent data has challenged this assertion, revealing that LBBB pattern may include distinct underlying pathophysiology, including patients with complete conduction block, either at the left-sided His fibers or the proximal left bundle, intact Purkinje activation with wide LBBB-like QRS, and patients demonstrating both proximal block and distal delay. Currently, BiVP-CRT is indicated for all QRS duration ≥150 ms and may be considered for BBB patterns from 130 to 149 ms with robust clinical data to support its use. Despite this, however, there remains a significant number of non-responders to BVP. Conduction system pacing (CSP) has emerged as an alternative approach to deliver CRT and correct QRS in patients with conduction block. Newer hybrid approaches which combine CSP and traditional BiVP-CRT and may hold promise for patients with IP or mixed-level block. As various approaches to CRT continue to be studied, physiologic phenotyping of the LBBB pattern remains an important consideration.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2022.962042/fullleft bundle branch blockcardiac resynchronization therapybiventricular pacingconduction system pacingleft bundle branch area pacing
spellingShingle Nathan W. Kong
Gaurav A. Upadhyay
Cardiac resynchronization considerations in left bundle branch block
Frontiers in Physiology
left bundle branch block
cardiac resynchronization therapy
biventricular pacing
conduction system pacing
left bundle branch area pacing
title Cardiac resynchronization considerations in left bundle branch block
title_full Cardiac resynchronization considerations in left bundle branch block
title_fullStr Cardiac resynchronization considerations in left bundle branch block
title_full_unstemmed Cardiac resynchronization considerations in left bundle branch block
title_short Cardiac resynchronization considerations in left bundle branch block
title_sort cardiac resynchronization considerations in left bundle branch block
topic left bundle branch block
cardiac resynchronization therapy
biventricular pacing
conduction system pacing
left bundle branch area pacing
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2022.962042/full
work_keys_str_mv AT nathanwkong cardiacresynchronizationconsiderationsinleftbundlebranchblock
AT gauravaupadhyay cardiacresynchronizationconsiderationsinleftbundlebranchblock