Legal Ontology, Scientific Expertise and The Factual World

This article analyses the role of scientific information in legal proceedings by exploring the relationship of law, science and the factual world. The article compares legal and scientific ontology, and discusses how they relate to each other. The comparison is used to explain previous controversie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lena Wahlberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Vienna 2016-11-01
Series:Journal of Social Ontology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journalofsocialontology.org/index.php/jso/article/view/6824
_version_ 1797818195501907968
author Lena Wahlberg
author_facet Lena Wahlberg
author_sort Lena Wahlberg
collection DOAJ
description This article analyses the role of scientific information in legal proceedings by exploring the relationship of law, science and the factual world. The article compares legal and scientific ontology, and discusses how they relate to each other. The comparison is used to explain previous controversies between legal and scientific experts. Special consideration is devoted to the legal notion of cause-in-fact, which is discussed at length. The article distinguishes among different meanings of “facticity” in the legal discourse on causation, and discusses the bearing that these meanings have on the legal relevance of scientific information.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T09:05:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-37e389208b52439d80a52b72870c2411
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2196-9663
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T09:05:34Z
publishDate 2016-11-01
publisher University of Vienna
record_format Article
series Journal of Social Ontology
spelling doaj.art-37e389208b52439d80a52b72870c24112023-05-28T07:32:21ZengUniversity of ViennaJournal of Social Ontology2196-96632016-11-0131Legal Ontology, Scientific Expertise and The Factual WorldLena Wahlberg0Lund University This article analyses the role of scientific information in legal proceedings by exploring the relationship of law, science and the factual world. The article compares legal and scientific ontology, and discusses how they relate to each other. The comparison is used to explain previous controversies between legal and scientific experts. Special consideration is devoted to the legal notion of cause-in-fact, which is discussed at length. The article distinguishes among different meanings of “facticity” in the legal discourse on causation, and discusses the bearing that these meanings have on the legal relevance of scientific information. https://journalofsocialontology.org/index.php/jso/article/view/6824legal ontologylaw and sciencecausationexpert testimonyquestions of fact
spellingShingle Lena Wahlberg
Legal Ontology, Scientific Expertise and The Factual World
Journal of Social Ontology
legal ontology
law and science
causation
expert testimony
questions of fact
title Legal Ontology, Scientific Expertise and The Factual World
title_full Legal Ontology, Scientific Expertise and The Factual World
title_fullStr Legal Ontology, Scientific Expertise and The Factual World
title_full_unstemmed Legal Ontology, Scientific Expertise and The Factual World
title_short Legal Ontology, Scientific Expertise and The Factual World
title_sort legal ontology scientific expertise and the factual world
topic legal ontology
law and science
causation
expert testimony
questions of fact
url https://journalofsocialontology.org/index.php/jso/article/view/6824
work_keys_str_mv AT lenawahlberg legalontologyscientificexpertiseandthefactualworld